marc fleury wrote:
> We saw with rickard that Proxy creation is a bit slow and he mentioned a
> flag at the object level to allow pooling... will have to research that...
> but for the pools I believe it is non important
See:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/java/lang/ref/ReferenceQueue.ht
Bill Burke wrote:
> Yeah, I guess it's cool now that you removed InstancePooling. God, pooling
> just fucked everything up and caused a lot of complexity. I wonder if
> pooling actually had any effect on performance anyways?
For objects that do a lot of stuff in set*Context, yes. Common
operati
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Bordet, Simone
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 1:01 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] new Threads.java (cache bug tests) is
> incomplete.
>
>
> Hey Bill,
>
> > Still, for Statefu
Sybase ASE is.
- Original Message -
From: "danch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-438115 ] JAWS lower-cases custom
finder SQL text
> Does anybody know what databases are case sensitive WRT column and t
Does anybody know what databases are case sensitive WRT column and table
names (or even keywords). I've never run into case sensitive SQL
databases before.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bugs item #438115, was opened at 2001-07-02 19:50
> You can respond by visiting:
> http://sourceforge.net/trac
Hi,
marc fleury wrote:
> this has been bothering me for quite some time...
I've been wondering too...
> did I just embarrass myself?
Not at all. Wanting to do that makes perfectly sense.
Only problem is that JTA doesn't allow it.
> do you guys know?
No, but an explanation from the JTA folks
Bugs item #438115, was opened at 2001-07-02 19:50
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=438115&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 BETA (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Jara (mjara)
Assigned to:
For the record, I didn't literally checkout the HEAD branch - this was
just a default checkout (no tag specified).
The only difference I can think of between my system and those who
report it working is that I'm running on a reiserfs filesystem - the jar
files could get sent back to Ant in an
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 89
Successful tests: 84
Errors:1
Failures: 4
[time of test: 3 July 2001 2:49]
See http://lubega.com for ful
|taken care of (actually by bill, that was a real fix (as opposed
|to removing
|the LW message ;-)) I am sticking to that logic
what I mean by that is that removing the LW message wasn't a fix. It was
cosmetic and *REALLY* pegged the cpu at 100%, this was the real bug simone
had, the busy-wait o
this has been bothering me for quite some time...
did I just embarrass myself?
do you guys know?
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 6:32 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: registerSync on rolledback transaction
|
|
|Hi,
|Marc, since you get rid of the pool, do you use WaitSemaphore to
|wait/notify
|or you wait/notify on the context ?
2 levels a ctx w/n and a ctx.getTxLock w/n for the tx related issues.
|That was a pain when I worked on it, but I believed the pool was somehow
|necessary for performance, didn't
Hi,
> that needs to be synchronized and simone does it in 2 steps... again I
> thought that was actually quite all right if not downright
> elegant with the
> entity symetry... (he did do somethings right)
[snip]
Ah, well, thanks !
Marc, since you get rid of the pool, do you use WaitSemaphore
Hey Bill,
> Still, for Stateful beans, you're adding complexity for the
> time between
> when the Stateful bean gets scheduled for passivation, and when the
> Passivator Thread actually runs. Which is only a few
> milliseconds, right?
> If the Stateful bean is scheduled for passivation, this
Oh yeah, one more point. Testing with Option C is also important because
Passivation is scheduled a lot more than with A or B.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
> Burke
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PR
Bugs item #437957, was opened at 2001-07-02 09:50
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=437957&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jay Walters (jwalters)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
|Yeah, I guess it's cool now that you removed InstancePooling. God, pooling
|just fucked everything up and caused a lot of complexity. I wonder if
|pooling actually had any effect on performance anyways?
we will see... it is one of those things where a fancy CMP engine would
SPEED us up SO MUCH
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 11:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] new Threads.java (cache bug tests) is
> incomplete.
>
>
> |> I don't understand the second point
If you're within the same transaction, you should be ok I guess.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vinay
> Menon
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 11:37 AM
> To: Dev @ JBoss
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] EJB 2.0 Locking for CMR
>
>
> Hello,
|> I don't understand the second point, what do you mean the calls will be
|> serialized? please explain,
|>
|>
|
|My point was that if you're accessing the same entity with the same primary
|key, the threads will be all queued up waiting on eachother. Only one
it better! that is the spec!
that
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/07/02 08:44:55
Modified:.faq.jsp
Log:
updated notes on unix boot scripts to refer to script in the distribution
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +6 -1 newsite/faq.jsp
Index: faq.jsp
===
Hello,
After reading the CMP section in the ejb spec pfd2 I still am not sure
about the way locking mechanisms will work in ejb2.0? How is it being
implemented in JBoss? If I have a table A and it has a one-to-many
relationship with table B [entities in B have a foreign key relationship
with A
Hmm,
Should you be specifying port 1099 as part of the url?
Vinay
- Original Message -
From: "Kristoffer Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ClassCastException in jBoss TE in VAJ 3.5
> On Mon, 2 Jul
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Vinay Menon wrote:
> your client needs jars under JBOSS_HOME/client .
It already has them in its classpath. However, when it didn't I got
NoClassDefFoundError, not ClassCastException.
/ Kristoffer
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kristoffer Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTEC
The bean developer uses the home/remote interfaces, Dain is building the
plumbing that makes it transparent to the bean developer. For example if
the bean developer adds an object to a 1:n CMR under the covers the
container/persistence manager/CMP beans need to get data into the bean and
the data
your client needs jars under JBOSS_HOME/client .
- Original Message -
From: "Kristoffer Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 2:16 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] ClassCastException in jBoss TE in VAJ 3.5
>
> I am running VisualAge for Java 3.5 and th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
> Sundstrom
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 2:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Where is everyone today?
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL P
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 11:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] new Threads.java (cache bug tests) is
> incomplete.
>
>
> Ok finishing the test of the cache, fo
I am running VisualAge for Java 3.5 and the jBoss Test Environment
and have written a simple client to the example EJB
org.jboss.test.tomcat.ejb.bean.jBoss.StatelessSessionBean. However,
when I try to run the client I get this nasty exception:
javax.naming.NoInitialContextException: Cannot insta
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/07/02 04:35:44
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
JDBCEntityBridge.java
Log:
fixes to get a clean jikes compile - [ #433345 ] Jikes patch - thanx Jesper
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2
jboss/
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/07/02 04:35:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jmx/client ConnectorFactoryService.java
Log:
fixes to get a clean jikes compile - [ #433345 ] Jikes patch - thanx Jesper
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +1 -6 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jmx/client/Conne
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/07/02 04:35:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jdbc HypersonicDatabase.java
Log:
fixes to get a clean jikes compile - [ #433345 ] Jikes patch - thanx Jesper
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +2 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jdbc/HypersonicDatabase.jav
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/07/02 04:35:44
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jms JMSContainerInvoker.java
Log:
fixes to get a clean jikes compile - [ #433345 ] Jikes patch - thanx Jesper
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +22 -32
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jm
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/07/02 04:35:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/web ThreadPool.java
Log:
fixes to get a clean jikes compile - [ #433345 ] Jikes patch - thanx Jesper
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +4 -4 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/web/ThreadPool.java
Index: Thre
Yo yourself,
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Bordet, Simone
|
|Yo,
|
|> I'm on top of it, got the fix with the next generation of
|> synchronization...
|> but it is 12:30 am and I need to get up at 5 to go to the INS
|> and get my
|> permanent residency card... yep got to be in line at 6
Yo,
> I'm on top of it, got the fix with the next generation of
> synchronization...
> but it is 12:30 am and I need to get up at 5 to go to the INS
> and get my
> permanent residency card... yep got to be in line at 6am
> otherwise "me no
> get in, and me no get card at INS (US immigration FY
Yo,
I'm back to real life !
I'd suggest not to use HEAD tag, it's used by CVS and does not reflect the
most recent code on the main trunk. If I remember well, just deleted files
have HEAD tag, so you will checkout them even if they're not part of the
most recent code.
Simon
> -Original Me
37 matches
Mail list logo
