Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
We decided to forgo an explicit future 3.0 branch and just make main the place for future development. Commit the rabbit hole work to main and it becomes a part of the current 2.5 development work. It will be released as a 3.0 branch. - Original Message - From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [JBoss-dev] gentlemen, have you considered

2001-07-07 Thread marc fleury
mine you punk, mine :) marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason |Dillon |Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 1:13 AM |To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] gentlemen, have you considered | | |There are a

Re: [JBoss-dev] gentlemen, have you considered

2001-07-07 Thread Jason Dillon
There are a few ladies too =) --jason On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, marc fleury wrote: > > that we might be > the best in the world? > > huh? > > never mind... > I'm just losing it > > _ > Marc Fleury, Ph.D > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ > > > ___

[JBoss-dev] Mail Delivery Status Notification

2001-07-07 Thread Postmaster
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER NOTIFICATION The following message: TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DATE: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 21:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-439278 ] log4j ConsoleAppender xxx(msg,e) (fwd) has been quarantined by Mail Essentials for the f

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-439278 ] log4j ConsoleAppender xxx(msg,e)(fwd)

2001-07-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Where is the patch? There is nothing attached to this. --jason -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 04:19:23 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-439278 ] log4j ConsoleAppender xxx(msg,e)

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-07 Thread marc fleury
|Now that is what it should look like ;) yeah, the strange part is that I didn't do anything :) I just waited (well was working on the website forums) and poof, just like that, they were gone :) marcf | |--jason | | |On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | |> |> |> JBoss daily test resu

[JBoss-dev] gentlemen, have you considered

2001-07-07 Thread marc fleury
that we might be the best in the world? huh? never mind... I'm just losing it _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Now that is what it should look like ;) --jason On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > JBoss daily test results > > SUMMARY > > Number of tests run: 112 > > > > Successful tests: 112 > > Errors:0 > > Failures:

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-07 Thread marc fleury
|-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 9:47 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results | | | | |JBoss daily test results | |SUMMARY | |Number of tests run: 112

RE: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

2001-07-07 Thread marc fleury
ok good, so I need to deal with the branch stuff only if I want to back port something. Ok. what happened to the 3.0 branch? I am finishing the jive stuff online (moving the forums) and would like to commit the rabbit hole work I have... will that go in 2.5? it is really "new" work... new Main

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
Right, you committed to main. This is the 2.5 effort although its not a branch. - Original Message - From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 6:34 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD > ok, > I am super confused... > > so the chan

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite team.jsp

2001-07-07 Thread marc fleury
User: mnf999 Date: 01/07/07 20:39:44 Modified:.team.jsp Log: moitie moitie il faut que j'aprenne a partager meme si ca me gene Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +30 -29newsite/team.jsp Index: team.jsp ==

[JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-07 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 112 Successful tests: 112 Errors:0 Failures: 0 [time of test: 8 July 2001 2:46 GMT] See http://lubega.com f

RE: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

2001-07-07 Thread marc fleury
ok, I am super confused... so the changes I made to the interceptor won't show in 2.4 right? only in the 2.5 branch. marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott |M Stark |Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 7:33 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |S

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
Yes, every incremental change made on a branch needs to be tagged to make it easy to identify the changes going into a release. - Original Message - From: "Aaron Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 4:18 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

2001-07-07 Thread Aaron Mulder
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Scott M Stark wrote: > When you make a change to a branch you need to tag it with the > next beta binary release tag: Rel_... Are you saying that a release does not just label and use the "head of the branch" but is built based on a label created at the time of the pre

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
When you make a change to a branch you need to tag it with the next beta binary release tag: Rel_... A change typically does not use the latest label if that is what your referring to as the "current 2_4 label". > > the datasource element was added to the entity element in version 1.1.2.2 > on B

Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
kvvinaymenon, You need to follow the cvs proceedures for updating a branch and making sure the changes are applied to main. Read them here: http://www.jboss.org/CVSAdmin.jsp and then clean up your changes. - Original Message - From: "Mike Swainston-Rainford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMA

[JBoss-dev] Getting rid of ejx related classes

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
The org.jboss.ejb.deployment and org.jboss.ejb.plugins.jaws.deployment packages seem to only be for the ejx editor app. I want to remove these so speak up if you have a reason to leave them in the core. ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTE

[JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD

2001-07-07 Thread Mike Swainston-Rainford
the datasource element was added to the entity element in version 1.1.2.2 on Bracnh_2_4. But it hasn't been updated on the main branch or added to the 2_4 label. Shouldn't this change go onto both main and the current 2_4 label? There is also a code change associated with this - src/main/org

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: manual/src/docs howtomssql.xml jbossdocs.xml jdbc-database.xml

2001-07-07 Thread Vincent Harcq
User: vharcq Date: 01/07/07 14:56:58 Modified:src/docs howtomssql.xml jbossdocs.xml jdbc-database.xml Log: Compliance 2.2 for MS SQL How To Move MS SQL HowTo to JDBC Chapter Add version required and Minerva Pool data source configuration for Inet Opta driver Mention MS SQLSE

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: manual/src/docs/images jboss_web_dtd.jpg jboss_dtd.jpg

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/07 12:25:17 Modified:src/docs/images jboss_dtd.jpg Added: src/docs/images jboss_web_dtd.jpg Log: Add a section to the advanced config chapter about the use of the jboss-web.xml deployment descriptor. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +17

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: manual/src/docs webconfig.xml advconfig.xml jbossdocs.xml

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/07 12:25:16 Modified:src/docs advconfig.xml jbossdocs.xml Added: src/docs webconfig.xml Log: Add a section to the advanced config chapter about the use of the jboss-web.xml deployment descriptor. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +4 -0

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/resources/web/WEB-INF jboss-web.xml web.xml

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/07 11:20:34 Modified:src/resources/web/WEB-INF jboss-web.xml web.xml Log: Update tests of ejb-ref/ejb-link Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +0 -12 jbosstest/src/resources/web/WEB-INF/jboss-web.xml Index: jboss-web.xml =

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/web/servlets ENCServlet.java

2001-07-07 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/07 11:21:10 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/web/servlets ENCServlet.java Log: Access all of the ejb-ref entries to test the bindings Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +7 -1 jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/web/servlets/ENCServlet.java

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/build/stylesheets summary1.xsl

2001-07-07 Thread Chris Kimpton
User: kimptoc Date: 01/07/07 08:53:05 Modified:src/build/stylesheets summary1.xsl Log: added clarification Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +1 -1 jbosstest/src/build/stylesheets/summary1.xsl Index: summary1.xsl =

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-07 Thread Chris Kimpton
Hi, Thanks for that - I've re-run them and get these results... JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 112 Successful tests: 111 Errors:1 Failures: 0 -

Re: [JBoss-dev] daily testing...

2001-07-07 Thread Chris Kimpton
--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yep - clean of all projects, "cvs up -Pd" and then a build of > them > > all and then the test - so its never re-run over the same tests - > but > > it is always run with all tests one after the other... > > > > Just to clarify... you `build.sh

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/bin jboss_init_redhat.sh

2001-07-07 Thread Chris Kimpton
User: kimptoc Date: 01/07/07 08:32:33 Modified:src/bin jboss_init_redhat.sh Log: send console output to dev null Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 jboss/src/bin/jboss_init_redhat.sh Index: jboss_init_redhat.sh

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/bin jboss_init_redhat.sh run.sh

2001-07-07 Thread Chris Kimpton
User: kimptoc Date: 01/07/07 08:21:47 Modified:src/bin jboss_init_redhat.sh run.sh Log: added ability to run jboss as current user to init script and use of JBOSS_HOME in run.sh - if set Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +32 -3 jboss/src/bin/jboss_init_redhat.sh

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-439284 ] Cannot create Primary key class CMP2.0

2001-07-07 Thread noreply
Bugs item #439284, was opened at 2001-07-07 05:36 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=439284&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)

[JBoss-dev] Mail Delivery Status Notification

2001-07-07 Thread Postmaster
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER NOTIFICATION The following message: TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DATE: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 04:19:23 -0700 Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-439278 ] log4j ConsoleAppender xxx(msg,e) has been quarantined by Mail Essentials for the following re

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-439278 ] log4j ConsoleAppender xxx(msg,e)

2001-07-07 Thread noreply
Patches item #439278, was opened at 2001-07-07 04:19 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=439278&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Ano

[JBoss-dev] Is the JBoss website down for maintenance?

2001-07-07 Thread Vinay Menon
___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development