___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Patches item #439278, was opened at 2001-07-07 04:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=439278group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #439284, was opened at 2001-07-07 05:36
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=439284group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/07/07 08:32:33
Modified:src/bin jboss_init_redhat.sh
Log:
send console output to dev null
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 jboss/src/bin/jboss_init_redhat.sh
Index: jboss_init_redhat.sh
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep - clean of all projects, cvs up -Pd and then a build of
them
all and then the test - so its never re-run over the same tests -
but
it is always run with all tests one after the other...
Just to clarify... you `build.sh clean main` in
Hi,
Thanks for that - I've re-run them and get these results...
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 112
Successful tests: 111
Errors:1
Failures: 0
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/07/07 08:53:05
Modified:src/build/stylesheets summary1.xsl
Log:
added clarification
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 jbosstest/src/build/stylesheets/summary1.xsl
Index: summary1.xsl
User: starksm
Date: 01/07/07 11:21:10
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/web/servlets ENCServlet.java
Log:
Access all of the ejb-ref entries to test the bindings
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +7 -1 jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/web/servlets/ENCServlet.java
User: starksm
Date: 01/07/07 11:20:34
Modified:src/resources/web/WEB-INF jboss-web.xml web.xml
Log:
Update tests of ejb-ref/ejb-link
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +0 -12 jbosstest/src/resources/web/WEB-INF/jboss-web.xml
Index: jboss-web.xml
User: starksm
Date: 01/07/07 12:25:16
Modified:src/docs advconfig.xml jbossdocs.xml
Added: src/docs webconfig.xml
Log:
Add a section to the advanced config chapter about the use of the
jboss-web.xml deployment descriptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +4 -0
User: starksm
Date: 01/07/07 12:25:17
Modified:src/docs/images jboss_dtd.jpg
Added: src/docs/images jboss_web_dtd.jpg
Log:
Add a section to the advanced config chapter about the use of the
jboss-web.xml deployment descriptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2
User: vharcq
Date: 01/07/07 14:56:58
Modified:src/docs howtomssql.xml jbossdocs.xml jdbc-database.xml
Log:
Compliance 2.2 for MS SQL How To
Move MS SQL HowTo to JDBC Chapter
Add version required and Minerva Pool data source configuration for Inet Opta driver
Mention MS
the datasource element was added to the entity element in version 1.1.2.2
on Bracnh_2_4. But it hasn't been updated on the main branch or added to
the 2_4 label. Shouldn't this change go onto both main and the current 2_4
label?
There is also a code change associated with this -
The org.jboss.ejb.deployment and org.jboss.ejb.plugins.jaws.deployment
packages seem to only be for the ejx editor app. I want to remove these
so speak up if you have a reason to leave them in the core.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL
When you make a change to a branch you need to tag it with the
next beta binary release tag: Rel_major.even_minor.patch.build
A change typically does not use the latest label if that is what your
referring to as the current 2_4 label.
the datasource element was added to the entity element in
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
When you make a change to a branch you need to tag it with the
next beta binary release tag: Rel_major.even_minor.patch.build
Are you saying that a release does not just label and use the
head of the branch but is built based on a label created
Yes, every incremental change made on a branch needs to be tagged to
make it easy to identify the changes going into a release.
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD
ok,
I am super confused...
so the changes I made to the interceptor won't show in 2.4 right? only in
the 2.5 branch.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 7:33 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 112
Successful tests: 112
Errors:0
Failures: 0
[time of test: 8 July 2001 2:46 GMT]
See http://lubega.com
User: mnf999
Date: 01/07/07 20:39:44
Modified:.team.jsp
Log:
moitie moitie
il faut que j'aprenne
a partager
meme si ca me gene
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +30 -29newsite/team.jsp
Index: team.jsp
Right, you committed to main. This is the 2.5 effort although its not a
branch.
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 6:34 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JAWS_2_4 DTD
ok,
I am super confused...
so the changes I
ok good, so I need to deal with the branch stuff only if I want to back port
something. Ok.
what happened to the 3.0 branch? I am finishing the jive stuff online
(moving the forums) and would like to commit the rabbit hole work I
have... will that go in 2.5?
it is really new work... new Main,
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 9:47 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results
|
|
|
|
|JBoss daily test results
|
|SUMMARY
|
|Number of tests run: 112
Now that is what it should look like ;)
--jason
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 112
Successful tests: 112
Errors:0
Failures: 0
that we might be
the best in the world?
huh?
never mind...
I'm just losing it
_
Marc Fleury, Ph.D
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Now that is what it should look like ;)
yeah, the strange part is that I didn't do anything :)
I just waited (well was working on the website forums)
and poof, just like that, they were gone :)
marcf
|
|--jason
|
|
|On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
|
| JBoss daily test
Where is the patch? There is nothing attached to this.
--jason
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 04:19:23 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-439278 ] log4j ConsoleAppender xxx(msg,e)
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER NOTIFICATION
The following message:
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DATE: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 21:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-439278 ] log4j ConsoleAppender xxx(msg,e) (fwd)
has been quarantined by Mail Essentials for the
mine you punk, mine
:)
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 1:13 AM
|To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] gentlemen, have you considered
|
|
|There are a
We decided to forgo an explicit future 3.0 branch and just make main
the place for future development. Commit the rabbit hole work to main
and it becomes a part of the current 2.5 development work. It will be
released as a 3.0 branch.
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL
30 matches
Mail list logo
