JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 131
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 27 October 2001 6:27 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 130
Successful tests: 121
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 27 October 2001 5:29 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3
On 2001.10.26 19:10:53 -0400 Luke Taylor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to check in some minor changes for a bugfix but I have one or
> two questions first before I screw things up :-)...
>
> 1. What's the situation with the test suite on different platforms. I
> get a more errors than the number in
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 131
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 27 October 2001 4:8 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 129
Errors:5
Failures: 6
[time of test: 27 October 2001 3:18 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3
Hi,
>
> How come We run 130 with green ??? ...
>
A bit of a non-answer ... I don't know - presumably something to do
with some tests failing to start properly with the green thread
model... but it should be the same ;-)
Chris
=
Need somewhere to Live in London? - Then go to http://free
Hi,
I want to check in some minor changes for a bugfix but I have one or
two questions first before I screw things up :-)...
1. What's the situation with the test suite on different platforms. I
get a more errors than the number in the standard automated report? I'm
running on NT - do some of t
on 1-10-26 06.30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> JBoss daily test results
>
> SUMMARY
>
> Number of tests run: 130
>
>
>
> Successful tests: 121
>
> Errors:4
>
> Failures: 5
>
>
Feature Requests item #475370, was opened at 2001-10-26 10:32
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=475370&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
Bugs item #475312, was opened at 2001-10-26 07:30
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=475312&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigne
I looked at the RH version of the interceptor in question and all it
seems to do is pass-through: invokeHome throws an exception (no home
methods on MDBs) and invoke just calls invokeNext. Shouldn't invoke at
least suspend the current transaction?
I was also hoping that someone who better unde
Bugs item #475302, was opened at 2001-10-26 07:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=475302&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: toby cabot (tcabot)
Assigned to:
I noticed this earlier this week and no one responed to my question;-)
Scott changed TxManager to TransactionManager in the base class
TxInterceptorBMT without doing a clean/build. I thought about reverting,
but looked at the 3.0 code where a better solution was implemented. I
didn't have time
It seems that (I think Scott) updated the Interceptor to talk to the JTS
TransactionManager instead of the jboss TM, he did not substitute the
JBossTM-specific calls with the JTS-standard suspend()/resume() calls.
disassociateThread() is from org.jboss.tm.TransactionManager and we should
not rel
Patches item #475216, was opened at 2001-10-26 01:17
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=475216&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Holger Engels (hengels)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anony
15 matches
Mail list logo
