What do you use for JBoss's persistence, an RDBMS?
I suggest you consider supporting a MUCH SIMPLER and MUCH
FASTER option too:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=7290&g
roup_id=36113
I can help you out on that. What do you say?
See you, Klaus.
___
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 216
Successful tests: 202
Errors:11
Failures: 3
[time of test: 27 December 2001 5:43 GMT]
[java.version: 1
Ha ha ha. Found it. Once I opened the right file, Invocation.java, it was
totally obvious. The constructor for Invocation was missing call to
setTransaction, so the existing tx was ignored.
I checked the fix in.
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/26 20:44:51
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/invocation Invocation.java
Log:
Constructor was missing setTransaction. Just a simple typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -1 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/Invocation.java
Index: Invo
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 216
Successful tests: 202
Errors:11
Failures: 3
[time of test: 27 December 2001 4:43 GMT]
[java.version: 1
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 216
Successful tests: 202
Errors:11
Failures: 3
[time of test: 27 December 2001 3:35 GMT]
[java.version: 1
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 220
Successful tests: 202
Errors:15
Failures: 3
[time of test: 27 December 2001 2:49 GMT]
[java.version: 1
Just got back from dinner at my parents. I'll start looking at this now.
-dain
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] Screwed up TxInterceptorCMT
> let me dig 5 minu
Has anyone had any luck getting either NetBeans or JBuilder to build the
jboss-all project?
NetBeans seems to have a native method to invoke Ant scripts, but since
jboss-all requires a custom classpath, it simply doesn't work.
Looks like there is an AntRunner open tool for JBuilder, but I haven'
I must say most of the support posts going by feel like this one...
marcf
__
View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums:
http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=6278
_
###
BU MESAJ BIR SPAM DEGILDIR #
##
Degerli ziyaretcimiz,
Asagidaki avantajlardan yararlanmak istiyorsaniz lutfen sitemizi en kisa zamanda
tekrar
ziyaret ediniz.
0. IOn (10) Oyun siparis eden ilk iki kisiye [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,
[EMAIL P
> let me dig 5 minutes and I will go back to deployers
ok here is what I have so far,
the tm should be initialized properly in the BLCI,
put a trace in the invoke() call and see that
1- you have tm stop if you don't
2- the tx is there stop if it is not
3- that the Invocation that is create
> org.jboss.ejb.plugins.BaseLocalContainerInvoker
>
>
> h thinking aloud here, just walked the dog as a
> way to calm my nerves :) I remember there was hookup
> code in the containerinvoker that told the
> "baselocalCI" where to find the transaction
> monitor... and use that to retrieve
> stack below (you are going through the
> org.jboss.ejb.plugins.BaseLocalContainerInvoker
h thinking aloud here, just walked the dog as a way to calm my nerves :) I
remember there was hookup code in the containerinvoker that told the "baselocalCI"
where to find the transaction monitor
So a BMT started transaction doesn't propagate to the other bean.
This might very well be a bug in the new proxy code. Is this with the local invoker?
I am swamped at the moment, I really trying to sort out the deploy spaghetti structure
and it is taking all my cycles at the moment.
give me
> DAIN,
>
> try this thread, online, there were changes done to the tx interceptor by
anatoly akkerman, maybe I missed > something when I ok'ed it
>
> regards
>
> marcf
I'm not sure which forum you are talking about. There is a discussion about
JXM transactions in the JMX forum, but this is not
Just a note,
the dynamic classloading is based on the old model of the non centralized classes and
needed class annotation and whatnot, the new Unified classloader doesnt' need these
and we can put a simple URL in the annotation.
This should really speed up things in download as well.
The bo
just a ping dain (online is really superior for that) I just added a ping to the tx
thread by anatoly and that is the only changes to the tx logic
marcf
__
View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums:
http://jboss.org/forum
DAIN,
try this thread, online, there were changes done to the tx interceptor by anatoly
akkerman, maybe I missed something when I ok'ed it
regards
marcf
__
View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums:
http://jboss.org/for
There is no "container rewrite" the code that does the TX is the same. In other words
the invoker layers didn't touch that.
I do remember a brief discussion with someone on TX stuff in BMT though, like a couple
of weeks, maybe you want to search that, I remember oka'ing some changes.
marcf
_
1- since the deployers are now unified the distinction between deploy and deploy/lib
is a bit artificial. It used to be (since this summer so it is not that established
either) that applications and classes and services would be deployed in different
places. I put that in, I am ripping it o
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> Its' 7 lines of code (really) so unless someone has a fundamental
> religious problem with typed lookups I will add this in.
Well, if the object being returned by the lookup is supposed to be the
MBean then 'typed' anything assumes a bit much (which is w
22 matches
Mail list logo
