[JBoss-dev] Chkconfig script for RedHat based LINUXes, 2nd edition...

2002-01-17 Thread Ivan Bilenjkij
here it is: jboss script has some major changes in functionality and there is an optional but useful /etc/jboss.conf file added. look through the sources... cheers ivan ps. remove .dat if there it is appended to the files. these should be called simply jboss and jboss.conf ___

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-01-17 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 270 Successful tests: 268 Errors:1 Failures: 1 [time of test: 18 January 2002 4:59 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-01-17 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 270 Successful tests: 268 Errors:1 Failures: 1 [time of test: 18 January 2002 4:11 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-01-17 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 270 Successful tests: 268 Errors:1 Failures: 1 [time of test: 18 January 2002 3:23 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-01-17 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 270 Successful tests: 267 Errors:1 Failures: 2 [time of test: 18 January 2002 2:53 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/metadata StandardMetaData.java

2002-01-17 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 02/01/17 17:20:08 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mx/metadata StandardMetaData.java Log: ugly little interim fixes so that it passes compliance tests - this code will show up on radar again when I add the non-compliant-mbean tests Revision ChangesPath

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/objectname PatternTEST.java

2002-01-17 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 02/01/17 17:12:22 Modified:src/main/test/compliance/objectname PatternTEST.java Log: testsuite updates, mostly related to standard MBeanInfo Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +152 -149 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/objectname/PatternTEST.java Index

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/javax/management MBeanOperationInfo.java

2002-01-17 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 02/01/17 17:14:13 Modified:src/main/javax/management MBeanOperationInfo.java Log: changed public static final int values to be the same as in the RI so that code compiled using the RI will still work against jboss-jmx Revision ChangesPath 1.4

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/standard AttributeInfoTEST.java ConstructorInfoTEST.java InfoTortureSUITE.java InfoTortureTEST.java OperationInfoTEST.java SpuriousAttributeTEST.java StandardSUITE.java TrivialTEST.java

2002-01-17 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 02/01/17 17:12:23 Modified:src/main/test/compliance/standard StandardSUITE.java TrivialTEST.java Added: src/main/test/compliance/standard AttributeInfoTEST.java ConstructorInfoTEST.java InfoTortureSUITE.java

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/standard/support Torture.java TortureMBean.java Trivial.java TrivialMBean.java

2002-01-17 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 02/01/17 17:12:23 Modified:src/main/test/compliance/standard/support Trivial.java TrivialMBean.java Added: src/main/test/compliance/standard/support Torture.java TortureMBean.java Log: testsuite updates, mo

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java

2002-01-17 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 02/01/17 17:12:22 Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java Log: testsuite updates, mostly related to standard MBeanInfo Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +7 -8 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java Index: ComplianceSU

Re: [JBoss-dev] Source code editors

2002-01-17 Thread Anatoly Akkerman
Try AnyJ, unless you are doing commercial development it is free. It is also free for evaluation. See their license. The IDE is quite fast (way much smaller than JBuilder) and has some very useful features. I think, I've heard about it from Marc in one of his e-mails. ---

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: The penny drops - JBoss Repository Selector

2002-01-17 Thread marc fleury
|Well, it really simple. In the case of Weblogic which does not use |log4j for its own logging, each application (that uses log4j) gets a |different copy of log4j classes loaded into memory. It follows that how, how is the "gets a different copy". i don't want to hear about the parent delegation

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: The penny drops - JBoss Repository Selector

2002-01-17 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 17:28 17.01.2002 -0800, marc fleury wrote: >2.x uses the weblogic way of classloading (i.e. jar as parent of war). > >We ran into problems and limitations about a year ago, also where in the >picture are services. The classloading scheme is about to be changed when I >commit the Unified Deploy

RE: [JBoss-dev] Scheduler Updates

2002-01-17 Thread Dain Sundstrom
So what does the correct -service.xml mbean entry look like? I started using this last night and found the documentation way off but the jboss-service.xml had the correct xml to get the stuff started (it had a constructor tag under the main mbean tab). Thanks dain > -Original Message-

[JBoss-dev] Scheduler Updates

2002-01-17 Thread Andreas Schaefer
Hi Geeks For the current CVS head (JBoss 3.0) I made some changes to the Scheduler: 1) When you set an "Initial Start Date" in the past the Scheduler will check if now can be reached by the period and repetition. If it can then the Scheduler will start there and reduce the repetitio

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: The penny drops - JBoss Repository Selector

2002-01-17 Thread marc fleury
2.x uses the weblogic way of classloading (i.e. jar as parent of war). We ran into problems and limitations about a year ago, also where in the picture are services. The classloading scheme is about to be changed when I commit the Unified Deployer (JBossDeployer). It essentially shares the class

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-478090 ] EJBLocalHome interface NOT passivateable

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #478090, was opened at 2001-11-04 13:20 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=478090&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Levart (plevart) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/util Scheduler.java SchedulerMBean.java

2002-01-17 Thread Andreas Schaefer
; import org.jboss.naming.NonSerializableFactory; import org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport; @@ -64,6 +66,20 @@ * MBean is not bind/unbind to JNDI server anymore * * +* 20020117 Andy: +* +* Change the behaviour when the Start Date is in the past. Now the

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/etc/conf/default jboss-service.xml

2002-01-17 Thread Andreas Schaefer
User: schaefera Date: 02/01/17 13:57:26 Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss-service.xml Log: Ajusted JSR-77 to the new JBoss JMX naming and the Scheduler now can be restarted and will keep the schedule and allows an easier date input for Initial Start Date Revision Changes

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/management/j2ee JDBCDataSource.java SingleJBossServerManagement.java

2002-01-17 Thread Andreas Schaefer
User: schaefera Date: 02/01/17 13:57:27 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/management/j2ee JDBCDataSource.java SingleJBossServerManagement.java Log: Ajusted JSR-77 to the new JBoss JMX naming and the Scheduler now can be restarted and will keep the schedule and all

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: The penny drops - JBoss Repository Selector

2002-01-17 Thread Ceki Gülcü
The problem *I* am interested in solving is to let each application have in its own independent logging universe. I don't see a problem with JBoss components sharing one logging universe (that of JBoss). The case of Tomcat or any other servlet container is very interesting because the user's ser

[JBoss-dev] Fwd: Re: The penny drops - JBoss Repository Selector

2002-01-17 Thread Ceki Gülcü
FYI I think jboss-dev is the most appropriate forum for this discussion. I will follow up with an answer to Adrian here. Regards, Ceki >List-Id: "Log4J Developers List" >Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Originating-IP: [19

Re: [JBoss-dev] Source code editors

2002-01-17 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Buy a MacOS X machine and run ProjectBuilder. Works really great for Java... An IDE that isn't obtrusive, highly customizable, with lots of keyboard shortcuts. > From: Khoa Do <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:04:34 -0800 > To: "'Rhett Aultman'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Jboss-Dev

RE: [JBoss-dev] Source code editors

2002-01-17 Thread Khoa Do
Thank you. I will try to give emacs a shot. It just that I can't get used to the having to type a control-XX to do something that I can do with a mouse. I use MS Visual studio a lot so I am used to the IDE and the project explorer with all the pretty objects and their graphical attrib

RE: [JBoss-dev] Source code editors

2002-01-17 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I have tried almost every ide and they all suck. I use vi, bash and ant. To make vi shut up just add the following to your .vimrc file set tabstop=3 set softtabstop=3 set shiftwidth=3 set autoindent set expandtab set vb t_vb= The last line is the important one. If you want to make bash shut up

RE: [JBoss-dev] Source code editors

2002-01-17 Thread Rhett Aultman
Pico is a fairly easy editor to deal with, but it's assinine in its insertion of carriage returns willy-nilly, and that can get you in trouble. I haven't used Forte much...can't you edit individual files without starting a new project? I know you can in most commercial IDEs. At least, I've b

Re: [JBoss-dev] [Fwd: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action t aken.]

2002-01-17 Thread Dave Smith
Me to. Guess I said pulled? Christian Riege wrote: > he, > > upon my last CVS commit (and the following e-mail by SF) I got the > attached reply. who the fuck (!) are these clowns? > > sorry for the spam ;) > > christian > > > --

[JBoss-dev] Source code editors

2002-01-17 Thread Khoa Do
Hi, I was just wondering if any of you guys have found any open source Java IDE that was worth using in developing Jboss. Emacs is too new for me. I can't stand vi because it beeps at me way too often. Forte CE is way too slow at start up and plus I wants us to create a new proj

RE: [JBoss-dev] More relationship stuff

2002-01-17 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Directionality of a relationship has nothing to do with fk mappings. The reason you are getting FKs in your address table is because you did not tell the engine to not create them. Add the following to the "Addr_has_no_idea_of_TestCust" role: -dain > -Original Message- > From: Dave

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-505029 ] WarpConnector isn't using the good dir

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #505029, was opened at 2002-01-17 11:17 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=505029&group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Guillaume Coté (gcote) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] [Fwd: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found andaction t aken.]

2002-01-17 Thread Christian Riege
he, upon my last CVS commit (and the following e-mail by SF) I got the attached reply. who the fuck (!) are these clowns? sorry for the spam ;) christian --- Begin Message --- Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ; Sender = Christian R

[JBoss-dev] More relationship stuff

2002-01-17 Thread Dave Smith
I've pulled the latest jboss head and I am testing a 1-1 uni directional relationship. The database tables are already created. So I have create table test_cust ( test_cust_id int PRIMARY KEY, billing_address_id int ); create table test_address ( test_address_id int PRIMARY KEY, an_address varc

[JBoss-dev] Training spots at Boston

2002-01-17 Thread marc fleury
Guys, we have 3 last minutes cancellations. We can still squeeze you in if any of you are interested in coming. Let us know marcf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

RE: [JBoss-dev] Destroying cmp BEAN instances

2002-01-17 Thread Vincent Harcq
Title: Message Wow :) And all that free for us, users so that we can ask free advices, complain, ... Thank you ! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of marc fleurySent: jeudi 17 janvier 2002 21:43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMA

RE: [JBoss-dev] Destroying cmp BEAN instances

2002-01-17 Thread Vincent Harcq
Title: Message As somebody point me on (defunct) Forums, calling a method that simply throws an RunTimeException should unvalidate the CMP Bean. In EJB 2.0 and 1.1, all non-application exceptions thrown by the instance result in the rollback of the transaction in which the instance executed

RE: [JBoss-dev] Destroying cmp BEAN instances

2002-01-17 Thread marc fleury
Title: Message forums WILL be back online,   we have a machine at DenverOnline that will take care of static website, and we are getting a machine at Rackspace that will do nothing but forums on RAID 1 and all.  We are getting the machine tomorrow, I will try to salvage the data from the f

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins AbstractInstanceCache.java

2002-01-17 Thread Christian Riege
User: lqd Date: 02/01/17 09:39:35 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins Tag: Branch_2_4 AbstractInstanceCache.java Log: fix for SF bug #504895: removeLockRef() is not called when release()-ing the bean Revision ChangesPath No

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504625 ] Generation of SQL for Locate() incorrect

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504625, was opened at 2002-01-16 14:03 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504625&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Basil Vandegriend (basilv) >Ass

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jms JMSContainerInvoker.java

2002-01-17 Thread Hiram Chirino
User: chirino Date: 02/01/17 09:18:31 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jms JMSContainerInvoker.java Log: Enhanced so that the MDB deploys even if the JMS provider is not running when it gets deployed. It will jump into recovery thread that trys to re-establish it's conn

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/ejbql EJBQLParser.java

2002-01-17 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 02/01/17 08:46:31 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/ejbql EJBQLParser.java Log: Changed the location function optional third parameter default to 1. Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +1 -1 jboss/src/main/or

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504895 ] missing removal of lock on Entity Beans

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504895, was opened at 2002-01-17 07:12 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504895&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd) Assigned to: Bill

RE: [JBoss-dev] out of memory

2002-01-17 Thread Bill Burke
Colin. Christian Riege found the problem. > -Original Message- > From: Colin Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:16 PM > To: Bill Burke; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] out of memory > > > > Hi Bill, > > thank you for the quick response.

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504895 ] missing removal of lock on Entity Beans

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504895, was opened at 2002-01-17 07:12 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504895&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd) Assigned to: Bill

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504895 ] missing removal of lock on Entity Beans

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504895, was opened at 2002-01-17 07:12 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504895&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd) Assigned to: Bill

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504895 ] missing removal of lock on Entity Beans

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504895, was opened at 2002-01-17 07:12 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504895&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd) Assigned to: Bill

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504481 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 08:58 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504481&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 9 Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74) Assigned to

RE: [JBoss-dev] Destroying cmp BEAN instances

2002-01-17 Thread marc fleury
Title: Nachricht Bill didn't you say you wanted to tackle that problem?   Seems like I won't be able to finish the deployer so you have 10 days :)   marcf -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill BurkeSent: Thursday, January 17,

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504895 ] missing removal of lock on Entity Beans

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504895, was opened at 2002-01-17 07:12 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504895&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd) Assigned to: Bill

RE: [JBoss-dev] Destroying cmp BEAN instances

2002-01-17 Thread Bill Burke
Title: Nachricht You mean clear the cache?  The caches are not exposed through mbeans, so there is no way to do this.  Please log a feature request at sourceforge -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Björn BlumSent: Thursday, Jan

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504481 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 08:58 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504481&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74) Assigned to: Bill

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504481 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 08:58 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504481&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74) Assigned to: And

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504481 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 08:58 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504481&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74) Assigned to: And

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504827 ] Example in the doc not comform to DTD

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504827, was opened at 2002-01-17 04:00 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504827&group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Guillaume Coté (gcote) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504481 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 08:58 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504481&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74) >Assigned to: Bil

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-502025 ] JBoss fail to start

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #502025, was opened at 2002-01-10 12:37 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=502025&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ronan-Yann Lorin (ryl) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504827 ] Example in the doc not comform to DTD

2002-01-17 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504827, was opened at 2002-01-17 04:00 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504827&group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Guillaume Coté (gcote) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] Destroying cmp BEAN instances

2002-01-17 Thread Björn Blum
Title: Nachricht Hello,   may somebody tell me, how i can force the container of the app server to destroy some instances of cmp beans? (Sorry, if this question is foolish, but I'm new in developing with EJBs and JBOSS)   thanx bjoern