Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread nobody
Jason, Can you please put the version from "Ignacio Coloma" on main.jboss.org/snapshots or give him ftp access. He claims its a working version which might people until Marc's back. Thanks, Chris. ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-01-25 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 69 Successful tests: 0 Errors:69 Failures: 0 [time of test: 26 January 2002 3:40 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss compilation failed

2002-01-25 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE symbol : class J2eeDeploymentException

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread Peter Fagerlund
You are marc´ed ! ... on 26-01-2 01.54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > who's marc ? > > ___ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-01-25 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 69 Successful tests: 0 Errors:69 Failures: 0 [time of test: 26 January 2002 3:19 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss compilation failed

2002-01-25 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE symbol : class J2eeDeploymentException

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-01-25 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 69 Successful tests: 0 Errors:69 Failures: 0 [time of test: 26 January 2002 2:58 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss compilation failed

2002-01-25 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE symbol : class J2eeDeploymentException

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-01-25 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 69 Successful tests: 0 Errors:69 Failures: 0 [time of test: 26 January 2002 2:42 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.0

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss compilation failed

2002-01-25 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE symbol : class J2eeDeploymentException

Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread nobody
who's marc ? ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

RE: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread Ignacio Coloma
If somebody give me a ftp site where to upload it I can upload a working src/compiled version (one or two days before marc's commit :) Which I suppose would make you happy ;) The list is almost dead these days, I suppose everybody is working hard (Jan/Feb use to be hard months, at least for me)

[JBoss-dev] NPE in SharedLocalConnectionManager.allocateConnection:100

2002-01-25 Thread Conner, Quentin
We are seeing a NPE in the allocateConnection() method of SharedLocalConnectionManager only on SMP boxes under load.  The   We have a unique environment with connection pooling from 2.4.4 and the server from 2.4.2.  The connection object from con = (ManagedConnection)pool.getObject(new Con

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread nobody
oh well ... i guess its time to go to bed then its 12.27pm in london and my hopes of coding through the night are gone :( Nevermind dammit. I can do other stuff on my architecture Thanks for the info. ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTEC

[JBoss-dev] NPE in SharedLocalConnectionManager.allocateConnection [JBoss 2.4.2 Server + 2.4.4 Pool]

2002-01-25 Thread Conner, Quentin
We are seeing a NPE in the allocateConnection() method of SharedLocalConnectionManager only on SMP boxes under load.  The   We have a unique environment with connection pooling from 2.4.4 and the server from 2.4.2.  The connection object from     Has anyone seen this and is there a fix?  I

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread Hunter Hillegas
The current CVS tree is broken... Marc (the lead Jboss developer), was in the middle of committing the new deployer architecture when he had to leave for Boston. Unfortunately he's been unable to get a line there to finish the commit. He should be back soon and the commit will be done, Jboss will

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread nobody
forgive my useless questions, should i wish to redirect the build output ie the dir under build/output where do i edit that variable ? Would it be too much to ask that maybe in the docs that are for sale, you, the 3l33t could provide info regarding the ant build tasks, the restarting of your s

Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread nobody
> Snaps as of today: http://main.jboss.org/snapshots/ it doesn't builds either :( ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread nobody
ok heavies i am a lowly jboss user type person, i got the snapshot for jboss-all, it failed to build. If you interested see the build.log below, otherwise just ignore me *sigh* i wish i was part of the 3l33t club. configure: [echo]groups: default [echo]modules: j2ee,naming,server

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread nobody
source in CVS is dead. it doesn't compile. I've tried different dates, Rel3_0_0_2 - nothing works. just nothing. JBoss 3.0 seems to exist only on developers' hard drives, not in CVS. ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.s

RE: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread Jason Dillon
Snaps as of today: http://main.jboss.org/snapshots/ --jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot > > As snap

RE: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread Jason Dillon
Give me a sec and I will put up a current snap. --jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot > > As snapshot

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread Hunter Hillegas
How about you download CVS from last week and roll your own? > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:11:47 -0600 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot > > As snapshot link is broken and wont be fixed till next week. Can someone >

[JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread nobody
As snapshot link is broken and wont be fixed till next week. Can someone provide me a temporary download link for a working snapshot from Jan'02. I really need to do a lots of design/ground-work before starting my next project on RH3.0/CMP2. I will really appreciate the help. Chris. __

RE: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshots link is broken..

2002-01-25 Thread Jason Dillon
The snapsnot has not been working since the server crash. --jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshots link

RE: [JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshots link is broken..

2002-01-25 Thread Bill Burke
Marc broke the nightly before he left for the training. I guess he'll fix it next week. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 5:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [JBoss-dev] 3.0

[JBoss-dev] 3.0 snapshots link is broken..

2002-01-25 Thread nobody
Hi, I need to get the latest snapshot (can't get CMP2 to work in JBoss alpha download from the site). But the link is broken (like many other broken links), please tell me where to get the nightly snapshop of 3.0 alpha? Tks, Chris. ___ Jboss-develop

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss Main.java

2002-01-25 Thread Hiram Chirino
User: chirino Date: 02/01/25 09:40:14 Modified:src/main/org/jboss Tag: Branch_2_4 Main.java Log: Added a systemExit() method so that Alexandria (an NT service java wrapper) can shutdown a jboss correctly. Revision ChangesPath No revision No

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss Main.java

2002-01-25 Thread Hiram Chirino
User: chirino Date: 02/01/25 09:31:29 Modified:src/main/org/jboss Main.java Log: Added a systemExit() method so that Alexandria (an NT service java wrapper) can shutdown a jboss correctly. Revision ChangesPath 1.63 +11 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/Main.java

RE: [JBoss-dev] catalina Connector customizing... bug/patch/ideas (was: org/jboss/web/catalina ajp13connector support)

2002-01-25 Thread Coetmeur, Alain
> -Message d'origine- > De: Luke Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Coetmeur, Alain wrote: > > by the way your ideas seems good, and moreover > > to help people whou want to explicitly configure > > each of their catalina connector > > (like the people tryin to have both http and http

Re: [JBoss-dev] org/jboss/web/catalina ajp13connector support

2002-01-25 Thread Luke Taylor
Coetmeur, Alain wrote: > > by the way your ideas seems good, and moreover > to help people whou want to explicitly configure > each of their catalina connector > (like the people tryin to have both http and https), > the type "none" could be added > > with the only changes at > > if( typ

[JBoss-dev] Continued: jboss 2.4.4 deployment problem on RedHat 7.2

2002-01-25 Thread Alexey Yudichev
I forgot to repeat, this problem doesn't exist at all under MS Windows and the same JDK. Best wishes, Alexei Yudichev mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss

[JBoss-dev] Continued: jboss 2.4.4 deployment problem on RedHat 7.2

2002-01-25 Thread Alexey Yudichev
After some research I've come closer to the cause of the problem. I'll explain again. Let's take cts.jar from jboss-test. The issue really depends on neither type and number of beans in the application nor their database connectivity. In my experiments i've used cts.jar with all the beans disabled