[JBoss-dev] multiple invoker configuration

2002-04-20 Thread Bill Burke
Okay, I've had some time to start working on multiple invokers per container. Here's what the config looks like. I'm too tired to explain, but you should be able to understand it by the example below. standardjboss.xml: *NOTE* is removed from container-configuration entity-

Re: [JBoss-dev] SAR... Sucky ARchive ?

2002-04-20 Thread Frederick N. Brier
I am afraid I beg to differ. I think that the SAR is an excellent concept and approach. First of all it is simple. Simple is good. Sometimes simple doesn't cover all the bases, but being too complex can make something unusable. In JBoss 2.4x, I had created an alternate solution, but it wa

[JBoss-dev] is 1.2.2 support dead?

2002-04-20 Thread Bill Burke
If so, I can clean up some of the dead configuration stuff in standardjboss.xml and the meta data classes. Bill ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: next-gen mbean config

2002-04-20 Thread Bill Burke
So, xmbeans are what I'm suggesting? What are xmbeans? Are they talked about in Juha's book? Thanks, Bill > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David > Jencks > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 2:43 AM > To: Bill Burke > Cc: Jboss-Dev > Su

Re: [JBoss-dev] SAR... Sucky ARchive ?

2002-04-20 Thread Jason Dillon
> 1. Related to these problems is the question of how we should store > "persistent" mbean attributes and the desired relationship between these > persistent attributes from storage and those from a possibly modified > config file. Remember the bad old days of jboss-auto.jcml? That is gone > but

Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: next-gen mbean config

2002-04-20 Thread David Jencks
I think both of these fit well into the xmbean configuration, although they aren't there now. Earlier today I thought about putting default mbean dependencies there -- such as on the naming service or tm which you might not want to repeat in every mbean needing them. similar idea. david jencks

Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] MBean interceptor stack config & params

2002-04-20 Thread David Jencks
One of my older xml books says you can have in a dtd which will allow any content. Don't know if you can do this in xsd. I think interceptors should come from interceptor factories which are mbeans -- thus configured via mbean configuration process -- and assembled into stacks by other mbean

[JBoss-dev] RE: next-gen mbean config

2002-04-20 Thread Bill Burke
Another thing we could use mbean-templates for is to define default mbean dependencies for EJBs as well. > -Original Message- > From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 2:16 AM > To: Jboss-Dev > Subject: next-gen mbean config > > > Jason got me thinking,

[JBoss-dev] next-gen mbean config

2002-04-20 Thread Bill Burke
Jason got me thinking, We need a standard way of configuring some sort of MBean templates. In the future, we need to be able to define what an MBean looks like in standard meta-data that can be used as a factory to create new mbeans. We should and will be able to define distributed object frame

Re: [JBoss-dev] SAR... Sucky ARchive ?

2002-04-20 Thread David Jencks
1. Related to these problems is the question of how we should store "persistent" mbean attributes and the desired relationship between these persistent attributes from storage and those from a possibly modified config file. Remember the bad old days of jboss-auto.jcml? That is gone but no replac

Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] MBean interceptor stack config & params

2002-04-20 Thread Jason Dillon's Test Account
Yes perhaps... but I think only if we can get a schema to accept any given xml nested inside of a tag... which I still don't know if that is possible. Otherwise we would need to wrap that in CDATA & let the interceptor do whatever it wanted with it (parse it into xml, read it as properties, bla

RE: [JBoss-dev] MBean interceptor stack config & params

2002-04-20 Thread Bill Burke
Maybe pass in XML configuration. blah blah Much more flexible. More food for thought. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason > Dillon > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 1:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [JBoss-dev] M

[JBoss-dev] MBean interceptor stack config & params

2002-04-20 Thread Jason Dillon
Ever since tahoe I have been thinking about MBean interceptor stack configuration... very cool when we get it up and working. One thing I was thinking would be nice would be allow passing init arguments to the interceptor, similar to servlet init params. As well as a name for the interceptor.

[JBoss-dev] SAR... Sucky ARchive ?

2002-04-20 Thread Jason Dillon
Well, perhaps not completly sucky, but as it is now it does suck. When I wrote that email long ago about those pesky birds, which eventually lead to .sar (and other things), I did not have this in mind. The idea was to make it *easier* to configuration components not complicate it. SAR as it

[JBoss-dev] Sill a problem with IIOP startup...

2002-04-20 Thread Jason Dillon
I am still getting errors like this from a default build: 21:16:01,826 INFO [MainDeployer] Successfully completed deployment of package: file:/C:/home/jason/workspace/jboss/jboss-all/build/output/jboss-3.1.0alpha/server/default/deploy/jbossmq-destinations-service.xml 21:16:01,826 INFO [MainDe

[JBoss-dev] New mailing list & forum added for CVS commit logs

2002-04-20 Thread Jason Dillon
I have just finished setting up the forum integration for the new email list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You will need to subscribe to this list to receive cvs change notifications: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-cvs-commits I also dropped the 'CVS update:' prefix, as the '[jboss-c

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: CVSROOT log_accum.pl loginfo

2002-04-20 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 02/04/20 20:26:04 Modified:.log_accum.pl loginfo Log: change target address for logs Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +2 -2 CVSROOT/log_accum.pl Index: log_accum.pl ==

[JBoss-dev] Deployment Design

2002-04-20 Thread Larry Sanderson
Hi - This is a small list of requirements for JBoss's deployment process. Please provide as much feedback as you can and help fill in the gaps. Thanks. For the purpose of this document, the following Definitions will apply: ·user – The user (usually a person) attempting to deploy an applicatio

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest build.xml

2002-04-20 Thread Francisco Reverbel
User: reverbel Date: 02/04/20 12:31:05 Modified:.build.xml Log: - IIOP tests excluded from tests-standard-stress. - Created target tests-iiop-stress. - Targets tests and tests-stress now depend on tests-iiop-stress. Revision ChangesPath 1.110 +56

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/logging LoggerManager.java

2002-04-20 Thread Trevor Squires
User: squirest Date: 02/04/20 10:13:31 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mx/logging LoggerManager.java Log: test driving new intellij inspection feature - found this typo Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -1 jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/logging/LoggerManager.java Index:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-546528 ] Generic Values in the MBeanRegistry

2002-04-20 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #546528, was opened at 2002-04-20 16:36 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=546528&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adrian Brock (ejort) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/server/registry BasicMBeanRegistry.java MBeanEntry.java MBeanRegistry.java ManagedMBeanRegistry.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 09:31:00 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mx/server/registry BasicMBeanRegistry.java MBeanEntry.java MBeanRegistry.java ManagedMBeanRegistry.java Log: Allow generic data to be stored with an MBeans registration

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/registry RegistrySUITE.java ValuesTestCase.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 09:31:00 Added: src/main/test/implementation/registry RegistrySUITE.java ValuesTestCase.java Log: Allow generic data to be stored with an MBeans registration. Fixed the double creation of the MBeanRegistry. Synchronized the lo

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/server MBeanServerImpl.java ServerConstants.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 09:30:59 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mx/server MBeanServerImpl.java ServerConstants.java Log: Allow generic data to be stored with an MBeans registration. Fixed the double creation of the MBeanRegistry. Synchronized the long seq

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation ImplementationSUITE.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 09:31:00 Modified:src/main/test/implementation ImplementationSUITE.java Log: Allow generic data to be stored with an MBeans registration. Fixed the double creation of the MBeanRegistry. Synchronized the long sequence numbers in the MBean Registry

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/registry/support Trivial.java TrivialMBean.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 09:31:01 Added: src/main/test/implementation/registry/support Trivial.java TrivialMBean.java Log: Allow generic data to be stored with an MBeans registration. Fixed the double creation of the MBeanRegistry. Synchronized the lo

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/registry/support - New directory

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 09:18:23 jmx/src/main/test/implementation/registry/support - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/registry - New directory

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 09:17:38 jmx/src/main/test/implementation/registry - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/javax/management/monitor Monitor.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 04:37:49 Modified:src/main/javax/management/monitor Monitor.java Log: Improved Timer and Monitor Services Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +18 -176 jmx/src/main/javax/management/monitor/Monitor.java Index: Monitor.java ===

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/javax/management/timer Timer.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 04:37:49 Modified:src/main/javax/management/timer Timer.java Log: Improved Timer and Monitor Services Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +35 -173 jmx/src/main/javax/management/timer/Timer.java Index: Timer.java =

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/util RunnableScheduler.java SchedulableRunnable.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 04:37:50 Added: src/main/org/jboss/mx/util RunnableScheduler.java SchedulableRunnable.java Log: Improved Timer and Monitor Services Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/util/RunnableSc

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/performance/timer TimerTortureTestCase.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 04:37:50 Modified:src/main/test/performance/timer TimerTortureTestCase.java Log: Improved Timer and Monitor Services Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +0 -1 jmx/src/main/test/performance/timer/TimerTortureTestCase.java Index: TimerTor

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx build.xml

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 04:37:49 Modified:.build.xml Log: Improved Timer and Monitor Services Revision ChangesPath 1.36 +55 -1 jmx/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file: /cv

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/stress/timer TimerSUITE.java TimerTestCase.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 04:37:50 Added: src/main/test/stress/timer TimerSUITE.java TimerTestCase.java Log: Improved Timer and Monitor Services Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jmx/src/main/test/stress/timer/TimerSUITE.java In

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/stress StressSUITE.java

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 04:37:50 Added: src/main/test/stress StressSUITE.java Log: Improved Timer and Monitor Services Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jmx/src/main/test/stress/StressSUITE.java Index: StressSUITE.java =

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/stress - New directory

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 04:27:12 jmx/src/main/test/stress - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/stress/timer - New directory

2002-04-20 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/04/20 04:27:37 jmx/src/main/test/stress/timer - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

RE: Jar in sar policy; client deployment *was* AW: [JBoss-dev] Reason for castor?

2002-04-20 Thread Sacha Labourey
Hello I agree for the optional thing, and clustering should definitively go in the optional folder! Cheers, sacha ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development