Bugs item #547128, was opened at 2002-04-22 15:33
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=547128group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Erik Konijnenburg (konijnenburg)
I may be forced too in the short-term... though I really don't have much time.
I think Jasper folks should just fix their stuff...
--jason
Quoting marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jason,
why don't you be that JSP maintainer. It seems to me that it would really
give the JBoss version a
Number of tests run: 585
Successful tests: 576
Errors:8
Failures: 1
[time of test: 29 April 2002 8:7 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
Quoting David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's a milestone, but ...
1. There are more bugs
2. this is only one jvm.
3. I think the testsuite should run twice with no errors (see bug 549775)
We should make sure that the state of the container is the same before and
after a test runs... I
WHAT!!!?? This is not cool... I am still early into reading 300+ messages for
today... one of which I think you posted saying things are cool... BUT
It is not cool to not update your workspace before committing. Marc has done
this before and it just ends up in lost work... some of my work...
sorry,
I´ll drop the subject.
Michael Delamere
- Original Message -
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss3.0 + apache2.0.35 + tomcat4.0.3 + virtual
hosts
Your asking at the wrong time as I
This
would of course break all custom interceptor stuff (where you
actually pass
data back and forth) but would enable a cheat mode for all
If I remember well, we can only attach generic data when sending data to the server,
but not receiving FROM the server.
2 solutions.
1- I build a mapper that takes String and returns ObjectName
2- you build a ObjectName implementation that caches the ObjectName and
returns the right Object if you pass me exactly the same String.
OK, but it must be a requirement that this mapping be deterministic i.e. when you
Hi,
By looking for usage of jaws.xml files, I think I've uncovered some
holes in the test suite:
[steve@ws102 src]$ find . -name jaws.xml
./resources/bank/META-INF/jaws.xml
./resources/bankiiop/META-INF/jaws.xml
./resources/bench/ejb/META-INF/jaws.xml
./resources/dbtest/META-INF/jaws.xml
Excellent work Bill!
I will take a look at the code later, but in the meantime there is something I haven't
seen. You say that clustering-specific config have been removed from
standard-jboss.xml. So, where are defined the default stack config for clustering? For
example, for HA-SFSB, we need
I was wondering if someone could give me a few pointers on getting jboss
source from cvs.
I've downloaded tortoise cvs, but on browsing the cvs tree from the
sourceforge home page i got a bit lost.
I'm looking for the lastest jboss version with jetty, but can figure out
what to download.
Thanks
Hello Sean,
Please, use the online forums @ http://www.jboss.org/forums/
For your particular problem, see http://www.jboss.org/developers/cvs.jsp
Cheers,
Sacha
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
[EMAIL
Bugs item #547160, was opened at 2002-04-22 18:49
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=547160group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matthias Damsch (damschm)
Whoops! Did look to see if HA-SFSB had specific container
interceptors. Is
that the only one? I'll put it back.
what you just did is TERRIFIC! ;)
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Thanks for the answer.
My problem was more concerned with the use of virtual hosts using the
combination of servers mentioned in the subject line. Have you managed to
get this working?
I actually managed to get mod_jk to map my virtual host. So when I entered:
I'm starting to look into why so many tests fail if you run the tests
twice. I'm looking for the cause of
2002-04-29 01:08:00,408 ERROR [STDERR] java.sql.SQLException:
ResourceException javax.resource.ResourceException: No matching credentials
in Subject!
2002-04-29 01:08:00,410 ERROR [STDERR]
Get this OFF jboss-dev and in the web forum that is there for this kind of
issue
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Michael Delamere
|Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:36 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ricardo Argüello
|Subject: Re:
Bugs item #549313, was opened at 2002-04-26 19:11
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=549313group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ricardo Arguello (pajama)
Assigned to:
I have been running some tests to test the performance of JBoss 3.0 versus that of
JBoss 2.4 and have found that, under load, JBoss 3.0 is considerably slower than JBoss
2.4. My initial posts on this topic were to the DB forum but Dain Sundstrom suggested
that I post my findings here. The
Yep the main test only use JAWS. I think david was looking at getting
these tests to use JAWS and JBossCMP, but I think he got to busy. Do
you want to try to get them running under JAWS and JBossCMP?
-dain
Stephen Coy wrote:
Hi,
By looking for usage of jaws.xml files, I think I've
Patches item #550305, was opened at 2002-04-29 11:32
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=550305group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lucas McGregor (lmcgregor)
Assigned
both,
frankly it is now so inter-woven in applications that it would be suicidal
to change that. I just wanted to go on record for the Nth time that it
makes little sense to me. That is what Bill is pointing out as well. It
seems bizarre to me as well.
Oh well,
marcf
con la iglesia hemos
The jca spec says any operations done outside a managed transaction (i.e
one controlled by the tx manager) should be autocommit. So, presumably
they envisage writes being done outside tx, such as those you speak of.
The new local wrapper has this behavior, the xa one still doesn't.
david
The spec says that NOT_SUPPORTED is an optional thing for entities.
Frankly, I'm glad that the new stuff doesn't support it - really the
bizarre thing is doing anything with a dirty entity outside of a
transaction. It means that somebody is bringing in a lot of overhead and
not making use of
|standard consultant disclaimer: Or not.
ha ha aha aha LOL LOL LOL
Reminds me of the days I was out there, thinking to myself, whatever you
say dude! I charge you by the hour... these days I do the exact opposite, I
say exactly what is on my mind, with all the diplomacy you know I am capable
of
I am chill'n like a villon... got me some gin and juice and I am mighty fine.
As my note said, I had not finished reading email, and I did notice some
subjects that indicated that CVS was happy... no problem there. I did still
feel the need to express that I feel very strongly about properly
Dude, I was in a bad mood this morning. Sorry for being harsh.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
Dillon
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:51 PM
To: Bill Burke
Cc: Jboss-Dev
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD in danger
I am
aaaww, cuute
isn't this pretty, you ladies are so polite,
even SMD sounds kind of polite in your case,
marcf
PS: what the F*CK is jason doing on Gin and Juice at 3 PM on a Monday... or
are you talking about yesterday... well come to think of it I was on the
juice for
Bugs item #550389, was opened at 2002-04-29 15:34
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=550389group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Muhlestein (mulicheng)
The sauce helps me to wake up in the morning...
I was just kidding... I was smoking blunts =P
--jason
marc fleury wrote:
aaaww, cuute
isn't this pretty, you ladies are so polite,
even SMD sounds kind of polite in your case,
marcf
PS: what the F*CK is jason doing
|I was just kidding... I was smoking blunts =P
Ah then I am not the one to blame you :T
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
||I was just kidding... I was smoking blunts =P
|
|Ah then I am not the one to blame you :T
I miss saying hi to my little green friends
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number of tests run: 584
Successful tests: 560
Errors:13
Failures: 11
[time of test: 30 April 2002 0:40 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
It just pisses me off,
You ask for it, we go through the pain of scheduling it and reserving rooms
etc etc and not very many people sign up. If we don't get a 10 person
minimum, we will have to cancel this training. That would be a shame
considering training is a prerequisite for JBoss services
I just double checked my app and I am closing senders, sessions and connections where
appropriate... and yet I am still getting XAExceptions like this:
WARN TxCapsule [SocketListener-1] (MailingManager) XAException: tx=XidImpl
[FormatId=257, GlobalId=eng-ecr3a//21, BranchQual=]
Number of tests run: 575
Successful tests: 549
Errors:15
Failures: 11
[time of test: 30 April 2002 2:5 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Hi Geeks
Just uploaded the newest version of the 2.4.x marathon test.
It contains it own compilation path and startup script (see:
/jbosstest/src/build/marathon.sh) which you can adjust to
your needs. Of course there is also a windows script:
marathon.bat.
ATTENTION: the idea behind is to run
Number of tests run: 584
Successful tests: 562
Errors:21
Failures: 1
[time of test: 30 April 2002 2:56 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
I'm willing to tackle this. Do you have any idea what shape you would
like? Particular areas to cover?
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 04:31 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Yep the main test only use JAWS. I think david was looking at getting
these tests to use JAWS and JBossCMP, but I think he
19:58:53,880 INFO [STDOUT] * putting invoker entity-rmi-invoker into
ApplicationMetaData
19:58:55,543 INFO [STDOUT] _ creating binding for
ejb/jmx/ejb/Adaptor:stateless-rmi-invoker
19:58:55,763 INFO [STDOUT] ---Binding Home ejb/jmx/ejb/Adaptor
Please use logging.
--jason
*
Number of tests run: 584
Successful tests: 570
Errors:13
Failures: 1
[time of test: 30 April 2002 4:14 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
Stephen Coy wrote:
I'm willing to tackle this. Do you have any idea what shape you would
like?
Not sure what that means.
Particular areas to cover?
To start the I'd just like to see the CMP 1.1 tests running under
JBossCMP and JAWS in the unit test suite. Then it would be cool to
On 2002.04.29 23:35:20 -0400 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Stephen Coy wrote:
I'm willing to tackle this. Do you have any idea what shape you would
like?
Not sure what that means.
Particular areas to cover?
To start the I'd just like to see the CMP 1.1 tests running under
To all JavaCC Gurus,
The javacc grammar that JBossMQ is using has a problem. It can't detect
that the selector: definitely not a message selector! is an invalid
selector. It just parses the first itentifier, definitely and then skips
over the rest of the selector.
Is there an easy way for
Number of tests run: 579
Successful tests: 556
Errors:22
Failures: 1
[time of test: 30 April 2002 5:52 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
For what its worth, here's my hand reconfig notes for changing the
default DS to Oracle prior to running the test suite:
Oracle Setup for JBoss Unit Test Suite
1. Add the following to auth.conf
OracleDbRealm {
//
// Security domain for new jca framework.
// One
46 matches
Mail list logo
