Number of tests run: 592
Successful tests: 569
Errors:19
Failures: 4
[time of test: 1 May 2002 7:56 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
[ja
Number of tests run: 592
Successful tests: 578
Errors:11
Failures: 3
[time of test: 1 May 2002 7:0 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_02]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
[
Your change below fixes the problem. I checked out clean copies of these
files to make sure.
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 03:07 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> On 2002.05.01 00:54:02 -0400 Stephen Coy wrote:
>> I was beginning to think that I was talking to myself here :-)
>>
>> It looks like
>>
On 2002.05.01 00:54:02 -0400 Stephen Coy wrote:
> I was beginning to think that I was talking to myself here :-)
>
> It looks like
>
>org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.local.LocalManagedConnectionFactory.matchManagedConnections
>
> has the same problem.
Looking at the code I think my suggestion
I was beginning to think that I was talking to myself here :-)
It looks like
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.local.LocalManagedConnectionFactory.matchManagedConnections
has the same problem.
I will make this change and let you know. At the moment, I changed the
above function plus LocalManag
Number of tests run: 592
Successful tests: 578
Errors:11
Failures: 3
[time of test: 1 May 2002 5:51 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
I was assuming that a driver would not change the properties passed to it
on a getConnection(properties) call, but I was WRONG!! Oracle in their
infinite wisdom is adding some more properties.
Can you check if changing line 115 of LocalManagedConnectionFactory to
Connection con = getDri
Futher investigation reveals the following code in jboss-
all/connector/src/main/org/jboss/resource/adapter/jdbc/local/LocalManagedConnection.
java:
private void checkIdentity(Subject subject, ConnectionRequestInfo cri)
throws ResourceException
{
Properties newProps = mcf.ge
I'm running the current Branch_3_0 code and the above message has
started appearing in the last few days when deploying my ejb jar file.
I have an Oracle DS setup as per the example in jboss-
all/connector/src/etc/example-config/oracle-service.xml and the
appropriate security realm set up in lo
Number of tests run: 592
Successful tests: 585
Errors:3
Failures: 4
[time of test: 1 May 2002 4:21 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Team]
Bugs item #529871, was opened at 2002-03-14 08:36
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=529871&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Ass
Bugs item #547254, was opened at 2002-04-22 16:30
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=547254&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Bugs item #549163, was opened at 2002-04-26 12:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=549163&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Ass
Fixed. All parser unit tests now run without errors.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:50 PM
Subject:
Bugs item #550526, was opened at 2002-04-30 04:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550526&group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Achim Thesmann (thesmann)
A
Will do it. Just checked at www.iana.org and 8683 is unassigned,
so it should be better than our current port.
Thanks,
Francisco
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Why not change it to 8683 by default then?
>
> --jason
>
>
> Francisco Reverbel wrote:
>
> >As Adrian pointed out som
Number of tests run: 592
Successful tests: 577
Errors:12
Failures: 3
[time of test: 1 May 2002 3:2 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Team]
Number of tests run: 592
Successful tests: 575
Errors:3
Failures: 14
[time of test: 1 May 2002 2:4 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.vm.v
yes change it...!
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 5:12 PM
|To: Francisco Reverbel
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] IIOP port conflict on Windows XP
|
|
|Why not change
Why not change it to 8683 by default then?
--jason
Francisco Reverbel wrote:
>As Adrian pointed out some time ago, the IIOP port in the
>default config in HEAD and branch 3.0 (port 5000) conflicts
>with a Windows XP service ("SSDP Discovery Service", used for
>Universal Plug and Play).
>
>I co
Lets change the default port we use... or is there a reason we can't?
--jason
Francisco Reverbel wrote:
>See this thread:
>
> http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=13521
>
>Either disable the SSDP Discovery Service on Windows XP or change
>the IIOP port (OAPort) in server/d
Number of tests run: 576
Successful tests: 553
Errors:6
Failures: 17
[time of test: 1 May 2002 1:15 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.vm.
As Adrian pointed out some time ago, the IIOP port in the
default config in HEAD and branch 3.0 (port 5000) conflicts
with a Windows XP service ("SSDP Discovery Service", used for
Universal Plug and Play).
I considered changing the default config and moving IIOP to the
port officially reserved f
See this thread:
http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=13521
Either disable the SSDP Discovery Service on Windows XP or change
the IIOP port (OAPort) in server/default/conf/jacorb.properties.
Will send another message on this issue right now.
Regards,
Francisco
On Tue, 3
Hopefully this won't happen soon... or we are gonna be in trouble...
--jason
marc fleury wrote:
>|Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
>|the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us:
>|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>this is not looking good, we will stay as long
I'm looking into it.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:50 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ JavaCC Prob
|Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
|the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us:
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this is not looking good, we will stay as long as we can and then we jump
out the plane when the pilot pushes us out...
marcf
___
Sorry if this is the wrong forum to try this on, but I couldn't find one specifically
for the IIOP extensions to JBoss. If there is a more appropriate frum can some one
let me know. Anyway, here's the question:
I've been trying out the JBoss CVS Branch_3_0 and am having problems getting it to
It should be possible to define any sort of grammer with JavaCC.
Perhaps the root production does not have the proper terminators to
single the end of a selector?
--jason
Hiram Chirino wrote:
> To all JavaCC Gurus,
>
> The javacc grammar that JBossMQ is using has a problem. It can't
> det
EOM
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/
Bugs item #550819, was opened at 2002-04-30 17:36
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550819&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Assign
Bugs item #547128, was opened at 2002-04-22 08:33
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=547128&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Erik Konijnenburg (konijnen
Bugs item #549775, was opened at 2002-04-28 12:13
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=549775&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: N
I don't want this code under an org.apache package namespace if
we are maintaining it. Either this is an Apache contrib or JBoss
contrib. Use org.jboss.web.catalina as the parent package or remove
this code.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xx
Bugs item #550389, was opened at 2002-04-29 15:34
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550389&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Muhlestein (mulicheng)
Ass
Bugs item #532483, was opened at 2002-03-20 09:09
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=532483&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dave Smith (rimmeraj)
Assigned to: No
Bugs item #506774, was opened at 2002-01-21 22:17
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=506774&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 (stable)
>Status: Pending
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Burton (jason73)
>Assigne
Bugs item #549775, was opened at 2002-04-28 14:13
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=549775&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: N
Bugs item #550572, was opened at 2002-04-30 12:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550572&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Elsen (celsen)
Assign
Bugs item #550526, was opened at 2002-04-30 04:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550526&group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Achim Thesmann (thesmann)
>Assig
Bugs item #550572, was opened at 2002-04-30 05:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550572&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Elsen (celsen)
Assigned to
Bugs item #550572, was opened at 2002-04-30 10:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550572&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Elsen (celsen)
Assigned to
Bugs item #550606, was opened at 2002-04-30 15:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550606&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel Moos (moosi_1978)
Assigned to: No
Bugs item #550572, was opened at 2002-04-30 05:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550572&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Elsen (celsen)
Assigned to
Bugs item #550574, was opened at 2002-04-30 10:31
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550574&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: reyntjens (d_reyntjens)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #550572, was opened at 2002-04-30 10:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550572&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Elsen (celsen)
Assigned to
Andreas Schaefer wrote:
>Hi Geeks
>
>Just uploaded the newest version of the 2.4.x marathon test.
>It contains it own compilation path and startup script (see:
>/jbosstest/src/build/marathon.sh) which you can adjust to
>your needs. Of course there is also a windows script:
>marathon.bat.
>ATTENTI
Bugs item #550526, was opened at 2002-04-30 10:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=550526&group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Achim Thesmann (thesmann)
Assign
48 matches
Mail list logo
