I'm not sure this is related to what you are talking about, but I've
modified CastorJDOImpl.java. I haven't committed it, because I
haven't fully tested it yet. It executes which seems to indicate
that the database.xml and the mapping.xml were loaded, but I haven't
tried to write to the database
Feature Requests item #562800, was opened at 2002-05-30 23:36
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=562800&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to:
I have looked into replacing the metadata xml parsing with Castor XML in my
spare time (ha, spare time... I made a joke). From a few emails with the
Castor folks I belive that the XML snippet is possible with Castor because it
is based on XML Schema's and not DTD... but I have not tested anyth
The mechanism by which the AxisService registers its service is
questionable as instead of including a war with the required config
it is explictly creating a DeploymentInfo object for the war and
calling the web deployer. This broke when I made a change to use
the DeploymentInfo.ucl as the web co
jboss/transaction is now an active part of the build.
Nothing big, and most of you probably already have the module, but this is a
heads up that if you do not have the 'transaction' module that you need to
update your workspace.
If you do not have a "transaction" directory under jboss-all (or
Thanks,
Lin
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 6:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Realm Setting
Never as embedded tomcat uses the JBoss security infrastructure. You
have to use our security api inside of th
I'm running the MacOS X 1.3.1 VM
Here's a thread dump, with a bit of log context around it:
11:40:53,918 INFO [Server] JBoss (MX MicroKernel) [3.0.0RC4
Date:200205301431] Started in 1m:26s:143ms
11:41:29,704 INFO [RefNumBean] Next refNum is: 2644
Full thread dump:
"RMI TCP Connection(8)-
Never as embedded tomcat uses the JBoss security infrastructure. You
have to use our security api inside of the server.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Lin Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[
Too bad. Is it just for now or never?
Thanks a lot,
Lin
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Realm Setting
Custom tomcat realms are not supported by the embedded service.
Custom tomcat realms are not supported by the embedded service.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Lin Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:38 PM
Su
Number of tests run: 751
Successful tests: 740
Errors:7
Failures: 4
[time of test: 31 May 2002 1:41 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.vm.
Not in main as I was waiting for the ServiceController fix from Adrian
that prevented the duplicate destroy calls. In 3.0 the ServiceSupportMBean
is just guarding against this.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original M
Hi,
I am having problems to set up a custom realm in the integrated
jboss-3.0.0RC2_tomcat-4.0.3. I added the custom realm in the following file:
/catalina/conf/server.xml like this:
The server can never pick it up. Then I tried example:
http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/security/protected fr
I thought this was fixed... but I am still seeing this in HEAD:
10:36:29,762 ERROR [DLQ] Destroying failed
javax.jms.JMSException: This destination is not open!
at
org.jboss.mq.server.JMSDestinationManager.closeDestination(JMSDestinationManager.java:795)
at
org.jboss.mq.server.
Number of tests run: 751
Successful tests: 739
Errors:7
Failures: 5
[time of test: 31 May 2002 0:46 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.vm.
> Jason, my view is extremly simple. While I do see a hugggee interest in
> log4j (I do really love it, be sure of that, I do) and I even do see a
> huee interest in log4j on the client side ***while***
> developping/debugging, I see absolutely *no* interest in log4j (that I
> still lo
Bugs item #562647, was opened at 2002-05-30 17:51
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562647&group_id=22866
Category: None
>Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to: Nob
Bugs item #562660, was opened at 2002-05-30 18:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562660&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to: Nobo
Hi Simon,
3.0RC4
The testsuite doesn't hang, and it passes a simple test that failed on the
previous version (I'll add it to the testsuite this weekend + other more
complicated tests). Thanks for applying this.
I think there is still a problem with the ordering for
findClass(String) (and possibl
Bugs item #562647, was opened at 2002-05-30 17:51
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562647&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Perfect, this is the information i was looking for. Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Per
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> lsanders
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] sar startup ord
What does reactive mean? Shutdown is as you say in HEAD, but I have not
ported to 3.0.
--jason
On Thursday 30 May 2002 10:01 am, Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Hi Geeks
>
> I would like to reactive the Shutdown.java file (with
> using the new Server.shutdown()) because it allows
> an graceful shut
Hi All,
After a bit of market research we've dropped the CD subscription price to
$500.
$500 includes:
* 1 hour support.
* 4 CDs over 1 year span
* Document subscription
* graphical installer
Help support JBoss development.
Regards,
Bill Burke
JBossGroup
___
I'm Using Branch_3_0 latest .
Firstly my initial test of the locking code seems to work. I have a
couple of other machines to test it on, I'll keep you posted ...
If I have two mbeans that are of the same class in an .xml file I get a
java.lang.ClassCircularityError. So ...
jboss.j2ee:se
An initial draft of the JBoss 3.0 quick start guide is available:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jboss/JBoss.3.0QuickStart.pdf?download
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
__
Number of tests run: 606
Successful tests: 605
Errors:1
Failures: 0
[time of test: 30 May 2002 11:47 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
Number of tests run: 606
Successful tests: 604
Errors:2
Failures: 0
[time of test: 30 May 2002 10:22 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
Number of tests run: 606
Successful tests: 605
Errors:0
Failures: 1
[time of test: 30 May 2002 10:8 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[jav
Hi Geeks
I would like to reactive the Shutdown.java file (with
using the new Server.shutdown()) because it allows
an graceful shutdown of a JBoss server w/o exposing
HTML-Adaptor or using "kill".
Any objections ?
Have fun
x
Andreas Schaefer
Senior Consultant
JBoss Group, LLC
xx
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 18:46, Bill Burke wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> After a bit of market research we've dropped the CD subscription price to
> $500.
>
> $500 includes:
>
> * 1 hour support.
pr. month, 4 month, year or what?
> * 4 CDs over 1 year span
> * Document subscription
> * graphical installer
Hi All,
After a bit of market research we've dropped the CD subscription price to
$500.
$500 includes:
* 1 hour support.
* 4 CDs over 1 year span
* Document subscription
* graphical installer
Help support JBoss development.
Regards,
Bill Burke
JBossGroup
___
He makes fast decisions :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Bordet, Simone
> Sent: giovedì 30 maggio 2002 18:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] UnifiedLoaderRepository deadlocks
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> > How about in the 3_0 branch?
>
> Scott will decide.
>
> Simon
>
> >
Hi Dave,
> How about in the 3_0 branch?
Scott will decide.
Simon
> On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 12:12, Bordet, Simone wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have updated the ULR in HEAD to incorporate latest Adrian
> Brock's suggestions (thanks Adrian), and made the relevant
> methods single threaded.
> > Adri
How about in the 3_0 branch?
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 12:12, Bordet, Simone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated the ULR in HEAD to incorporate latest Adrian Brock's suggestions
>(thanks Adrian), and made the relevant methods single threaded.
> Adrian, if you can check if the changes I made correctly
Hi,
> I don't see how we can guarentee that there will not be deadlocks
> by focusing on making the ULR single threaded since that is not
> the point of locking that we do not have control over.
Yes. Making the ULR single threaded is an orthogonal issue (will make the ULR
simpler), but the rea
Hi,
I have updated the ULR in HEAD to incorporate latest Adrian Brock's suggestions
(thanks Adrian), and made the relevant methods single threaded.
Adrian, if you can check if the changes I made correctly implement your suggestions,
will be great.
Cheers
Simon
___
Bugs item #562293, was opened at 2002-05-30 04:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562293&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
>A
Jason Dillon wrote:
> You people are all insane. The size is small, and can be made even smaller if
> it really needs to be. Having light weight clients does not mean we must
> drop all client-side logging or hack together our own ultra-minimal logging
> framework or revert to System.out/prin
This has been available since (I think) 3.0 RC2. Take a look at the default
jboss-service.xml file. At the bottom in the Deployment Scanning section,
look for an attribute named "URLComparator". The default comparator
(DeploymentSorter) sorts by type in this order: *.sar, *service.xml, *rar,
*
Bugs item #562293, was opened at 2002-05-30 13:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562293&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 7
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Assign
This was killing us too. To solve this, we developed two tools:
1) An ant task that invokes jasper's jspc to translate jsps.
2) A wrapper servlet around jasper that will first check for and use a
precompiled jsp if it exists, and if not fall back to the default mode of
translating / compiling at
Bugs item #562293, was opened at 2002-05-30 13:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562293&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Assigne
I am +1000 on calling create, and then start immediately. I implemented
something like this at least once (I think there was only one step, start.
I have since been convinced that the init/create step is a good idea as
well. I don't think it should wait for dependencies, however). It does
requ
I've been trying to find what was decided for how to specify in what order
sar archives should be loaded and started, but the mail discussions I've
found points in many different directions. Could anyone please set me
straight?
I have a jxta.sar that i want to start before a ozone.jar
>From what
Bugs item #559441, was opened at 2002-05-23 01:21
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=559441&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
>Assigned to:
Bugs item #559441, was opened at 2002-05-23 11:21
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=559441&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Nobod
Bugs item #562293, was opened at 2002-05-30 13:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562293&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Assigne
Bugs item #562293, was opened at 2002-05-30 13:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562293&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Assigne
Yes.
Jason Dillon wrote:
> been integrated into 3.0?
>
> --jason
>
> ___
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _
Jason,
Looks like a bug was introduced during the recent changes for graceful
shutdown. A fix is on it's way and should be checked in shortly.
Jan
Jason Dillon wrote:
> Looks like Jetty in JBoss 3.0 (perhaps 3.1 too) will start servicing requests
> before a web application has been fully dep
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:26:26PM -0700, Jason Dillon wrote:
> The wrapper is specific to Log4j, we could make it non-specific, but
> then we get into writting our own logging infrastructer, which is
> not something I would suggest.
Why on earth would you need to do something like that? All you
Jason4j,
> The wrapper is specific to Log4j, we could make it non-specific,
> but then we
> get into writting our own logging infrastructer, which is not something I
> would suggest.
>
...
> What is your beef with log4j? I still don't understand why you
> want it to go.
Jason, my view is extrem
I don't see how we can guarentee that there will not be deadlocks
by focusing on making the ULR single threaded since that is not
the point of locking that we do not have control over. The issue
is the loadClassInternal class call initiated by the VM and my
concern is illustrated by this stack tra
Jason,
The problem here is that it looks like something has closed and then disabled the
output stream before your filter has finished. I'll at least fix the NPE
so it is a little more polite about this.
But we then need to work out what is happening. I just removed the sitemesh
stuff I h
Number of tests run: 606
Successful tests: 605
Errors:0
Failures: 1
[time of test: 30 May 2002 0:32 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[jav
·qP¡G±M§Q°Ó¼Ðºc·Q¤H¡B¥Ó½Ð¤H¡B©Ó¿ì¤H
Y¦³¥´ÂZ¡A·q½Ð¥]²[¡C
ª¾©ú±M§Q°Ó¼Ð¨Æ°È©Ò·q¤W
¹q¸Ü¡G(02) 2695 8836
0933 067 099
(¤@) ¥»©ÒÀuÂI
ªA°È©P¸Ô¡Aµ´¹ï«O±K¡FÀH®ÉÀH¨è¡A±Mµ{«ô³
56 matches
Mail list logo
