Bugs item #571995, was opened at 2002-06-21 17:07
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=571995&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Nobo
This is working for a simple testcase. Two jboss servers running
the minimal config are able to come up with the JNDI naming
service running on ports 1098 and 1099 using this type of config
in the conf/jboss-service.xml descriptor:
jboss1
file:/etc/jboss-bindings.xml
org.jboss.se
Number of tests run: 791
Successful tests: 781
Errors:6
Failures: 4
[time of test: 21 June 2002 6:17 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Team
Number of tests run: 763
Successful tests: 749
Errors:12
Failures: 2
[time of test: 21 June 2002 4:56 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.v
Number of tests run: 791
Successful tests: 780
Errors:6
Failures: 5
[time of test: 21 June 2002 3:35 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0_01]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
Bugs item #571930, was opened at 2002-06-20 22:25
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=571930&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: rick labanca (rickla)
Assigned to
Number of tests run: 791
Successful tests: 781
Errors:6
Failures: 4
[time of test: 21 June 2002 2:13 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
It does not have to be exposed if its not a useful op. These
management objects can just be created, registered on deployment
of a web module and unregistered when the web module is
undeployed. That would be simpler. I'm not sure if the web
container will have to actually create the management obj
Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Hi Jules
>
>
>>1. Are you sure that JSR77 talks at the granularity of Servlets - or is
>>it WebApplications - or both. A Servlet is not the unit of deployment,
>>the WebApplication is. A WebApplication may contain 0-n Servlets.
>
>
> JSR-77 have an application (EAR) w
Hi Scott
> At a minimum at the AbstractWebContainer level we define the hooks to
obtain
> the required Servlet[] management objects needed to make up the WebModule
> management object. There may not be much to this other than a simple
> template method that defines the requirements for obtaining
Hi Jules
> No problem - you specify the interface, and I shall implement the Jetty
> side.
>
The problem is there is no interface. That is what I need to have:
- WebModule (represents WAR)
- web.xml content
- List of Servlets per WebModule
Both WebModule can emits Notifications, manage
Hi Jules
> 1. Are you sure that JSR77 talks at the granularity of Servlets - or is
> it WebApplications - or both. A Servlet is not the unit of deployment,
> the WebApplication is. A WebApplication may contain 0-n Servlets.
JSR-77 have an application (EAR) with one or more modules (WAR,JAR,RAR)
At a minimum at the AbstractWebContainer level we define the hooks to obtain
the required Servlet[] management objects needed to make up the WebModule
management object. There may not be much to this other than a simple
template method that defines the requirements for obtaining management
informa
No problem - you specify the interface, and I shall implement the Jetty
side.
Jules
Scott M Stark wrote:
> As much of this as possible should be handled at the
> org.jboss.web.AbstractWebContainer
> or else we will have to duplicate this for every web container service.
>
>
Andreas,
I think that you will find that Jetty already exposes all this to JBoss
via JMX (perhaps not the list of current deployments - but that's not a
problem - I will sort it).
However a few points.
1. Are you sure that JSR77 talks at the granularity of Servlets - or is
it WebApplications
Hi Scott
> As much of this as possible should be handled at the
> org.jboss.web.AbstractWebContainer
> or else we will have to duplicate this for every web container service.
I would like that but how are we going to expose
attributes and methods dynamically in the Abstract-
WebContainer ?
Andy
Number of tests run: 770
Successful tests: 756
Errors:11
Failures: 3
[time of test: 21 June 2002 0:44 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.v
As much of this as possible should be handled at the
org.jboss.web.AbstractWebContainer
or else we will have to duplicate this for every web container service.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From
Hi Greg
To make JSR-77 implementation (a J2EE management
API) complete I need to support the web-service and
I wills start with Jetty (it seems to be tough enough).
To start with I need a place where I can create a
WebModule (represents a WAR file) and each
Servlet (for now the once defined in w
The Server Side has an article about Flash and J2EE. I know we have
support for Flash, but don't know enough about it to comment. Can
someone who knows about the Flash integration that we have post a
message on their thread?
http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=14080
--
x
You can write your own Jetty specific delegate or simply configure
a noop delegate and pull the service binding from the service. There
is no pooling of ports in this implementation. Its a simple static
XML configuration.
- Original Message -
From: "Jules Gosnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
I haven't tried anything to find out if I'm right, but I think each war
reference gets a DeploymentInfo with a UCL for the war, and the 2 UCL
confuse each other.
david jencks
On 2002.06.20 17:42:05 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote:
> Why did this behavior change with JBoss3? Both apps can use the same
Scott,
It is better for me if Jetty can pull the port number from this service,
since listeners may be started and stopped dynamically, and I don;t
really want to choose e.g. the first one and treat it differently from
the others
Is this an option - I request a port number, rather than ha
Why did this behavior change with JBoss3? Both apps can use the same
CL, they just need to bind to 2 different contexts. Or perhaps Jetty
has something which will do an internal proxy (nothing on the client
side) from one context to another.
I still believe that the app.xml I have should wor
I have imported this code into varia/src/main/org/jboss/services/binding
with the following changes:
1. A service can have multiple service bindings corresponding to
different listening services. The web containers need this to support
multiple virtual hosts and connectors.
2. The store service u
I never see any undeploy logs, only a deploy for one of the apps.
Previous versions of JBoss supported this. I need this to support
backwards compatibility for a URL change. It would be better if I could
specify a list of contexts to bind for the web module, but I do not
think there is such
Number of tests run: 640
Successful tests: 638
Errors:0
Failures: 2
[time of test: 20 June 2002 12:30 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[j
I think the problem you are having has already been fixed in cvs
Branch_3_0 and HEAD. The problem was that fields set after a finder was
executed were not stored.
As for debugging the first thing it to increase the log level of
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp to TRACE. The classes called when you
Thanks,
I've submitted a bug and uploaded a .war file that demonstrates the behavior.
-Jeff
Scott M Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
I added a testcase to the web integration unit tests and the call togetServletContext().getRealPath("/") works correctly there. Postan ear or war that demonstrates th
Bugs item #571721, was opened at 2002-06-20 17:13
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=571721&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Goke (jeffgoke)
Assigned to: Scott M
30 matches
Mail list logo
