[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585632 ] Problem with XA and Oracle

2002-08-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585632, was opened at 2002-07-23 18:24 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=585632&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Pending Resolution: Postponed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Igor Fedorenko (igorfie) As

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585632 ] Problem with XA and Oracle

2002-08-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585632, was opened at 2002-07-23 18:24 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=585632&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Open Resolution: Postponed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Igor Fedorenko (igorfie) Assig

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585632 ] Problem with XA and Oracle

2002-08-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585632, was opened at 2002-07-23 18:24 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=585632&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Open Resolution: Postponed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Igor Fedorenko (igorfie) Assig

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 3-August-2002

2002-08-02 Thread chris
Number of tests run: 916 Successful tests: 898 Errors:12 Failures: 6 [time of test: 3 August 2002 2:21 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1_03] [java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 2-August-2002

2002-08-02 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 864 Successful tests: 857 Errors:4 Failures: 3 [time of test: 2 August 2002 12:42 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.] [

[JBoss-dev] Our IIOP port number

2002-08-02 Thread Francisco Reverbel
So far we have been using port 8683 for IIOP. We picked the "well know port number" assigned to IIOP (which is 683) and added 8000 just to get out of the system port range. However, 8683 is not an officially assigned user port for IIOP (there is no such a thing), but simply an unassigned port

RE: [JBoss-dev] Please support Option B (response to Jim Cook)

2002-08-02 Thread Bill Burke
Jim Do not use MethodOnlyEJBLock on its own. In JBoss 3.0.1 and higher there is an additional container configuration you can use that creates an Instance per transaction for each entity bean. The side-effects, you must use Commit-option 'B' and you do not get serialized access to your entit

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585632 ] Problem with XA and Oracle

2002-08-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585632, was opened at 2002-07-23 15:24 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=585632&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Pending >Resolution: Postponed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Igor Fedorenko (igorfie) A

RE: [JBoss-dev] Please support Option B

2002-08-02 Thread Bill Burke
Tom, You're very wrong. Option B with "Instance Per Transaction" is a very good viable solution for those that allow Read-Committed-like access to entity beans and have synchronization problems with their entity beans (deadlock). I have a few customers using this option. Please do not misle

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585632 ] Problem with XA and Oracle

2002-08-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585632, was opened at 2002-07-23 17:24 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=585632&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Igor Fedorenko (igorfie) Assigned to

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585632 ] Problem with XA and Oracle

2002-08-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585632, was opened at 2002-07-23 22:24 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=585632&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Igor Fedorenko (igorfie) Assigned to

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-589771 ] Uneven structure of package makes error

2002-08-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #589771, was opened at 2002-08-01 11:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=589771&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: todd runstein (toddrun) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymo

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-589771 ] Uneven structure of package makes error

2002-08-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #589771, was opened at 2002-08-01 11:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=589771&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: todd runstein (toddrun) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymo

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-590100 ] getRollbackOnly, no IllegalStateExceptio

2002-08-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #590100, was opened at 2002-08-02 12:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=590100&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steinar Hansen (shansen5) Assign

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 2-August-2002

2002-08-02 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 864 Successful tests: 858 Errors:4 Failures: 2 [time of test: 2 August 2002 0:34 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.] [j