[JBoss-dev] Is the verifier too restrictive?

2002-08-19 Thread Ole Husgaard
Hi, In the testsuite, in the JCA test, the verifier warns: 2002-08-19 16:51:14,760 WARN [org.jboss.ejb.EJBDeployer.verifier] EJB spec violation: Bean : Teller Method : public abstract Account createAccount(Integer) throws RemoteException Section: 7.10.5 Warning: All the exceptions

[JBoss-dev] Wrong DeploymentSorter in 3_0 branch

2002-08-19 Thread Corby Page
Version 3.0.1 of JBoss still uses the wrong PrefixDeploymentSorter, the one that deploys numbered archives before deploying everything else. Can we get the fixed version of PrefixDeploymentSorter into this branch before the 3.0.2 release? Thanks, Corby -

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504481 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 17:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504481&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74) Assigned to: B

RE: [JBoss-dev] Optimizing MarshalledObject, or variants thereof

2002-08-19 Thread Sacha Labourey
hello Rickard, I've implemented your suggestion in JBoss and found strange results (under W2K, both 1.3 and 1.4 JVM with hotspot enabled). The difference is frequently not significant at all: sometimes the "optimized" version is faster, sometimes not (and by running tens of thousands of serialis

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-597216 ] Jetty in 3.0.1 has broken Jasper

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #597216, was opened at 2002-08-19 16:34 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=597216&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42) Assigne

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-597216 ] Jetty in 3.0.1 has broken Jasper

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #597216, was opened at 2002-08-19 18:34 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=597216&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42) Assigne

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504481 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 17:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504481&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74) Assigned to: B

Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD versioning

2002-08-19 Thread David Jencks
If you have a minute to do this in that would be wonderful. thanks david jencks On 2002.08.19 10:43:58 -0400 Michael Bartmann wrote: > By the way: > Shouldnt we commit your changes to deployment sorting (ds.xml anr rar > earlier) from > DeploymentSorter in HEAD (rev1.6) to Branch_3_2 also? > >

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-597186 ] LoadEntityCommand.getSQL() is not cached

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #597186, was opened at 2002-08-19 14:53 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=597186&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-594580 ] 3.0.1 tar file is bad

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #594580, was opened at 2002-08-13 06:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=594580&group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Callies (pcallies) Assign

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss modules as eclipse projects

2002-08-19 Thread philipborlin
Right click on an xml file and the popup menu will have an option called "Run Ant...". -Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-597186 ] LoadEntityCommand.getSQL() is not cached

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #597186, was opened at 2002-08-19 14:53 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=597186&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie) Assigned to: No

Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD versioning

2002-08-19 Thread Michael Bartmann
By the way: Shouldnt we commit your changes to deployment sorting (ds.xml anr rar earlier) from DeploymentSorter in HEAD (rev1.6) to Branch_3_2 also? Enjoy, Michael --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell p

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504481 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 17:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504481&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74) Assigned to: B

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504481 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504481, was opened at 2002-01-16 17:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504481&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: Shravan (cskreddy74) Assigned to: B

[JBoss-dev] Wrong PrefixDeploymentSorter in 3_0 branch

2002-08-19 Thread Corby Page
Hi folks, JBoss 3.0.1 still features the old PrefixDeploymentSorter, the one that performs number deployments before deploying other services. Can we possibly put the fixed PrefixDeploymentSorter into this branch before 3.0.2 is released? Thanks, Corby --

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-594580 ] 3.0.1 tar file is bad

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #594580, was opened at 2002-08-13 13:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=594580&group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Callies (pcallies) Assign

[JBoss-dev] CNG Station

2002-08-19 Thread Ms . Nily
Be interested in importing compressors from China, you are on the right way! China Chongqing International Econ & Tech Exchange (Group) Co., Ltd. Chongqing Gas Compressor Factory Dear Sir/Madam, Your name and e-mail has been given to us by your embassy in Beijing. Our company produces and di

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-597166 ] LoadEntityCommand.getSQL() is not cached

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #597166, was opened at 2002-08-19 14:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=597166&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie) Assigned to: No

Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD versioning

2002-08-19 Thread David Jencks
Keep it at 1_0 I think. Neither branch has actually been released yet;-) Thanks for writing this and I'm glad you can commit it now!! david jencks On 2002.08.19 07:43:26 -0400 Michael Bartmann wrote: > Hi, > last week (before gaining cvs-write-privilege) I submitted > a patch (nr. 595176) whic

[JBoss-dev] DTD versioning

2002-08-19 Thread Michael Bartmann
Hi, last week (before gaining cvs-write-privilege) I submitted a patch (nr. 595176) which allows you to use no-tx-datasources via xsl-deployment. I would really like to commit this into Branch_3_2 and HEAD, and everything is obviously upwards-compatible. But: should the upwards-compatible DTD sta

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-597047 ] MySQL constraint template lacks index

2002-08-19 Thread noreply
Bugs item #597047, was opened at 2002-08-19 10:32 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=597047&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Arjen J.W. Poutsma (poutsma) Assigned to: Nobod