Bugs item #600647, was opened at 2002-08-27 16:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600647group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #578063, was opened at 2002-07-06 12:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=578063group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.1
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Peuss (tpeuss)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #582965, was opened at 2002-07-17 19:55
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=582965group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.1
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to:
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] XADataSource wrapper for JBoss 3
I checked out the jboss-all module. I built the checked out code last night. It built jboss alpha 4.0.0. Im a bit confused. In the TODO forum you have two postings. One for a new XADataSource wrapper for JBoss 3 and one for a new JBoss
Jamie,
as posted by Scott Stark a couple of days ago :
TagStatus
Branch_2_4Bug fixes only, a 2.4.8 release is pending
Branch_3_0Bug fixes only for a 3.0.2 release if deemed necessary
Branch_3_2Stablization, essential new features and bug fixes for the 3.2.0 release
Patches item #600706, was opened at 2002-08-27 12:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=600706group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lennart Petersson (lepe)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #599229, was opened at 2002-08-23 05:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=599229group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Johnson (johnsbrn)
The new XADataSource wrapper is currently in cvs HEAD (jboss 4) only. If
someone will only please find out if it works and help fix bugs I will
backport it to jboss 3.2. 3.0.2 is pretty much fixed, I don't plan to
backport it there.
A long time ago (jboss 3.0 timeframe) I asked on the todo
David Jencks wrote:
In all but basic configurations the user/pw should be coming from a JAAS
login module. Setting the user/pw on the mcf properties should be a last
resort for when you can't get user/pw anywhere else.
Agreed, but it is extreemly convinient during testing. ;-)
We need a
Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-15 11:28
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595672group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #600800, was opened at 2002-08-27 09:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600800group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Johnson (johnsbrn)
Assigned to:
On 2002.08.27 09:19:04 -0400 Igor Fedorenko wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
In all but basic configurations the user/pw should be coming from a
JAAS
login module. Setting the user/pw on the mcf properties should be a
last
resort for when you can't get user/pw anywhere else.
Agreed, but it
Bugs item #600800, was opened at 2002-08-27 09:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600800group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Johnson (johnsbrn)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #600800, was opened at 2002-08-27 09:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600800group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Brian Johnson (johnsbrn)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #600810, was opened at 2002-08-27 09:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600810group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Assigned to: Dain
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] XADataSource wrapper for JBoss 3
Thanks David and Werner. l'm not so confused anymore.
Since it looks like l have the right code and l have made a start on testing the XADataSource wrapper l'll work on it some more tonight.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
Bugs item #600810, was opened at 2002-08-27 09:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600810group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Bugs item #600810, was opened at 2002-08-27 09:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600810group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Bugs item #600837, was opened at 2002-08-27 10:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600837group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Bugs item #600837, was opened at 2002-08-27 17:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600837group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Bugs item #600837, was opened at 2002-08-27 10:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600837group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
just to add : i've seen this before, but as i stop setting it back to
the cmr it stopped cleaning it. I thought it was strange, but not a bug.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bugs item #600810, was opened at 2002-08-27 09:24
You can respond by visiting:
Bugs item #600837, was opened at 2002-08-27 17:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600837group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
We are also using VBSF as our persistence engine with JBoss. I choose to
build a JCA adapter which exposes the Database facade as a connection. I
then built a framework for BMP beans that uses the capabilities of VBSF.
I've also added a few features to the VBSF engine (we have source license
as
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
The JBoss-3.0.2 release is available. This includes bug fixes as well
as enhancements to security with SSL support for JMS, clustered
EJBs, and extensions to the SRP authentication protocol. In addition
there is now support for JNDI/HTTP and RMI/HTTP.
The release may be obtained from
David Jencks wrote:
On 2002.08.27 09:19:04 -0400 Igor Fedorenko wrote:
[skipped]
How do I deploy rm specific wrapper? Am I right that there is a
prototype RARDeployment instance
(jboss.jca:service=RARDeployment,name=JBoss JDBC XATransaction
ResourceAdapter) that defines wrapper to be
Bugs item #601032, was opened at 2002-08-27 22:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=601032group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob (nextpulse)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
I think there are several related issues here... I hope I'm not confusing
things further.
1. I think we agree on vendor specific ManagedConnectionFactory
implementations wrapping vendors' XADataSource implementations, with
customized XAResource wrappers.
2. It is not really essential for
Bugs item #601049, was opened at 2002-08-27 16:26
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=601049group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Yan Pujante (madonnax)
Assigned to:
I do my JBoss development with eclipse.. but it is not easy to setup :(
If you are REALY interested, I can exand on how I do it, but it's not all
that nice.
Regards,
Hiram
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Igor
Fedorenko
Sent:
Good job!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Andreas Schaefer
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 10:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JMS 1.1
Hi Geeks
JMS 1.1 is in (it compiles and most test runs trough except
The frontpage of jboss.org has the city Sao Paulo written as Sao Paolo
: ). At really the name means Saint Paul in english (as you all must
already know).
As i'm already talking about sao paulo training, i'd like to ask you (Hi
mark : ) ) to low the value of the training. Not that it isn't
The frontpage of jboss.org has the city Sao Paulo written as Sao Paolo
: ). At really the name means Saint Paul in english (as you all must
already know).
Ok, but I prefer how Sao Paolo, sounds, just me.
I use to read a brazillian discussion list about J2EE (high level, by
the way), and
Bugs item #601097, was opened at 2002-08-28 12:45
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=601097group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
35 matches
Mail list logo