My build is running on a Siemens-Nixdorf RM200, OS Reliant-Unix 5.45,
JDK 1.3.1.
The output of build for module server is attached.
I do a daily checkout and build an did not have this problems before.
Frank Langelage
David Jencks wrote:
Thanks for the report. I didn't experience this or I
Hi,
I am sorry I have not had the time to do anything on the jca1.5
integration. I have not even had time to read the new spec. From what
you say I would however draw the following conclusions:
1. The jca 1.5 have defined a new contract superceding chapter 8 in the
JMS spec, which means that
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 03:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=603788group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #576943, was opened at 2002-07-03 15:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=576943group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Deleted
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Thanks Scott,
I should have figured - I always clean before a rebuild..
Have you fixed HEAD, 3_0 3_2 ?
Jules
Scott M Stark wrote:
Actually, this is not a XP problem, it is a build without doing a clean issue:
jetty 410build.sh
...
jetty 411!grep -r Class-Path output/classes
A couple of other possibilities are to change the code to use reflection so
the Oracle driver doesn't need to be present to compile, or to write a fake
Oracle class that just defines the needed methods and that we can compile,
but not include the fake class in the build.
If the dependencies are
Many thanks, peter. I have to work on some other things for a while also,
I will try to look into this more. Your pointers will be a big help in
seeing how it works.
Thanks
david jencks
On 2002.09.03 03:25:26 -0400 Peter Antman wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry I have not had the time to do anything on
Bugs item #603959, was opened at 2002-09-03 14:16
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=603959group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dirk Vleugels (vleugels)
Assigned
Bugs item #603959, was opened at 2002-09-03 14:16
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=603959group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Dirk Vleugels (vleugels)
Assigned
Thanks, I forwarded this to the xdoclet list with a couple more details
about our build script.
david jencks
On 2002.09.03 02:34:07 -0400 Langelage, Frank wrote:
My build is running on a Siemens-Nixdorf RM200, OS Reliant-Unix 5.45,
JDK 1.3.1.
The output of build for module server is
Bugs item #602587, was opened at 2002-08-30 19:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=602587group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nick Coleman (mystafer)
Assigned to:
I need it for JBossCMP also, so check in the binary.
-dain
David Jencks wrote:
A couple of other possibilities are to change the code to use reflection so
the Oracle driver doesn't need to be present to compile, or to write a fake
Oracle class that just defines the needed methods and that we
Change Notes item #604021, was opened at 2002-09-03 10:27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=604021group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 03:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=603788group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #601866, was opened at 2002-08-29 08:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=601866group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Baillieul (baillieul)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #597656, was opened at 2002-08-20 04:06
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=597656group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: vishal mehta (attachvishal1)
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 14:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595258group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 14:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595258group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
Only 3.0 as yet. 3.2 is delayed with testing issues and other priority
interrupts.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Hello all,
Sacha Labourey and I have written a companion workbook to O'Reilly's EJB
3rd Edition by Richard Monson-Haefel. It will be published sometime in
October and we would really like some feedback! Please refrain from grammar
and spelling mistakes, since our editor will handle these sort of
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 03:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=603788group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 01:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=603788group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #597656, was opened at 2002-08-20 02:06
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=597656group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: vishal mehta (attachvishal1)
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 03:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=603788group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 21:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595258group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
Bugs item #604085, was opened at 2002-09-03 10:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604085group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned
I am seeing a problem with Jetty not deploying wars from the deploy
directory in the current 3.0 and 3.2 branches. If you take the
default/deploy/jmx-console.war and repack this:
deploy 414ls -l jmx-console.war
-rw-r--r--1 starksm None58165 Sep 3 13:17 jmx-console.war
deploy 415jar
Hello all,
Sacha Labourey and I have written a companion workbook to O'Reilly's EJB
3rd Edition by Richard Monson-Haefel. It will be published sometime in
October and we would really like some feedback! Please refrain from grammar
and spelling mistakes, since our editor will handle these sort of
burkecentral
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390
___
Change Notes item #604118, was opened at 2002-09-03 21:29
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=604118group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky)
Assigned to:
DR:RUFUS MBEKI( B.Sc.,M.Sc. MNIM.)
DIRECTOR, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL URGENT
ATTENTION:Chairman/Ceo
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Dr.Rufus Mbeki a native of Cape Town in
South Africa and I am an Executive Accountant with
the South Africa Department of Mining Natural
Feature Requests item #604163, was opened at 2002-09-03 20:06
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=604163group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Alexander
I set environment variable JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx128m, default is 64m.
But build failed with similar error like yours, posted on the
xdoclet-dev mailing list.
There is a hint to increase available memory for ant using env ANT_OPTS.
So I also set ANT_OPTS=-Xmx128m and build was successful now.
Thanks
Scott,
I am not seeing this on :
Branch_3_2 - just refreshed
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode)
Linux zeuglodon 2.4.18-3 #1 Thu Apr 18 07:32:41 EDT 2002 i686 unknown
I have
Ive got the latest code and the timeout problem has gone away. I get a
different error but l will look at that once l have a go at running your
unit test.
Ive added a section to org.jboss.test.jca.test.XAResourceUnitTest for MS SQL
Server 2000 and Im running build tests. lm wondering when the
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 14:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595258group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
Number of tests run: 891
Successful tests: 865
Errors:22
Failures: 4
[time of test: 4 September 2002 2:51 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
test
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390
___
Jboss-development
38 matches
Mail list logo
