test
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
___
Jboss-development mail
Number of tests run: 891
Successful tests: 865
Errors:22
Failures: 4
[time of test: 4 September 2002 2:51 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
Bugs item #604258, was opened at 2002-09-03 16:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=604258&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Lynch (aaprincipal)
Assigned t
Bugs item #604258, was opened at 2002-09-03 16:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=604258&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Lynch (aaprincipal)
Assigned t
Hmm, in general that appears to be a problem I don't know the answer to.
Also in general hsql isn't going to affect this, it isn't xa. In your
case, looking at the stack trace shows that mssql is having the problems.
thanks
david
On 2002.09.03 18:44:57 -0400 Jamie Burns wrote:
> Ok. The XAReso
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 21:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=595258&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
A
For me the tests take about 2 hours :-((( featuring several
timeouts
To run just one test:
./build.sh one-test -Dtest=org.jboss.test.jca.test.XAResourceUnitTest
To run a directory of tests:
./build.sh test -Dtest=jca
To run any set of tests skipping compiling, jarring, etc:
.
Scott,
I guess this is your answer.
Does exactly the same WAR deploy OK with Catalina - or experience the
same difficulty?
Jules
Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> Jules,
>
> If I don't find a web.xml, I treat the webapp just as a docroot and
> will server files and JSPs OK.
>
> I think the problem
Ok. The XAResourceUnitTestCase threw 3 errors. See attached report.
There are sections for 3 adapters in the class. I have hsqldb-ds.xml
(Firebird?) and mssql-xa-ds.xml installed. Apart from removing one of them,
how do you tell which one has failed?
Thanks
Jamie
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 14:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=595258&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
A
Ive got the latest code and the timeout problem has gone away. I get a
different error but l will look at that once l have a go at running your
unit test.
Ive added a section to org.jboss.test.jca.test.XAResourceUnitTest for MS SQL
Server 2000 and Im running "build tests". lm wondering when the t
Scott,
I am not seeing this on :
Branch_3_2 - just refreshed
java version "1.4.0_01"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0_01-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_01-b03, mixed mode)
Linux zeuglodon 2.4.18-3 #1 Thu Apr 18 07:32:41 EDT 2002 i686 unknown
I have s
I set environment variable JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx128m, default is 64m.
But build failed with similar error like yours, posted on the
xdoclet-dev mailing list.
There is a hint to increase available memory for ant using env ANT_OPTS.
So I also set ANT_OPTS=-Xmx128m and build was successful now.
Thanks
Fra
Feature Requests item #604163, was opened at 2002-09-03 20:06
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=604163&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Alexander (bill
DR:RUFUS MBEKI( B.Sc.,M.Sc. MNIM.)
DIRECTOR, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL & URGENT
ATTENTION:Chairman/Ceo
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Dr.Rufus Mbeki a native of Cape Town in
South Africa and I am an Executive Accountant with
the South Africa Department of Mining & Natural
Resou
Change Notes item #604118, was opened at 2002-09-03 21:29
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=604118&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anony
Hello all,
Sacha Labourey and I have written a companion workbook to O'Reilly's "EJB
3rd Edition" by Richard Monson-Haefel. It will be published sometime in
October and we would really like some feedback! Please refrain from grammar
and spelling mistakes, since our editor will handle these sort of
I am seeing a problem with Jetty not deploying wars from the deploy
directory in the current 3.0 and 3.2 branches. If you take the
default/deploy/jmx-console.war and repack this:
deploy 414>ls -l jmx-console.war
-rw-r--r--1 starksm None58165 Sep 3 13:17 jmx-console.war
deploy 415>ja
Bugs item #604085, was opened at 2002-09-03 10:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=604085&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 21:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=595258&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 03:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=603788&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned
Bugs item #597656, was opened at 2002-08-20 02:06
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=597656&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: vishal mehta (attachvishal1)
A
burkecentral
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
___
Jboss-developm
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 01:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=603788&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 03:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=603788&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to:
Hello all,
Sacha Labourey and I have written a companion workbook to O'Reilly's "EJB
3rd Edition" by Richard Monson-Haefel. It will be published sometime in
October and we would really like some feedback! Please refrain from grammar
and spelling mistakes, since our editor will handle these sort of
Only 3.0 as yet. 3.2 is delayed with testing issues and other priority
interrupts.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Jules Gosnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 14:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=595258&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchard
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 14:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=595258&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
Bugs item #595258, was opened at 2002-08-14 14:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=595258&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchard
Bugs item #597656, was opened at 2002-08-20 04:06
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=597656&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
>Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: vishal mehta (attachvishal1
Bugs item #601866, was opened at 2002-08-29 08:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=601866&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Baillieul (baillieul)
Assigned to: Dain S
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 03:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=603788&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to
Change Notes item #604021, was opened at 2002-09-03 10:27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=604021&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to: D
I need it for JBossCMP also, so check in the binary.
-dain
David Jencks wrote:
> A couple of other possibilities are to change the code to use reflection so
> the Oracle driver doesn't need to be present to compile, or to write a fake
> Oracle class that just defines the needed methods and that
Bugs item #602587, was opened at 2002-08-30 19:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=602587&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nick Coleman (mystafer)
Assigned to:
Thanks, I forwarded this to the xdoclet list with a couple more details
about our build script.
david jencks
On 2002.09.03 02:34:07 -0400 "Langelage, Frank" wrote:
> My build is running on a Siemens-Nixdorf RM200, OS Reliant-Unix 5.45,
> JDK 1.3.1.
> The output of build for module server is att
Bugs item #603959, was opened at 2002-09-03 14:16
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=603959&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 8
Submitted By: Dirk Vleugels (vleugels)
Assigne
Bugs item #603959, was opened at 2002-09-03 14:16
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=603959&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dirk Vleugels (vleugels)
Assigned
Many thanks, peter. I have to work on some other things for a while also,
I will try to look into this more. Your pointers will be a big help in
seeing how it works.
Thanks
david jencks
On 2002.09.03 03:25:26 -0400 Peter Antman wrote:
> Hi,
> I am sorry I have not had the time to do anything o
A couple of other possibilities are to change the code to use reflection so
the Oracle driver doesn't need to be present to compile, or to write a fake
Oracle class that just defines the needed methods and that we can compile,
but not include the fake class in the build.
If the dependencies are o
Thanks Scott,
I should have figured - I always clean before a rebuild..
Have you fixed HEAD, 3_0 & 3_2 ?
Jules
Scott M Stark wrote:
> Actually, this is not a XP problem, it is a build without doing a clean issue:
>
> jetty 410>build.sh
> ...
> jetty 411>!grep -r Class-Path output/classe
Bugs item #576943, was opened at 2002-07-03 15:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=576943&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Deleted
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42
Bugs item #603788, was opened at 2002-09-03 03:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=603788&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
>Assigned to: Ch
Hi,
I am sorry I have not had the time to do anything on the jca1.5
integration. I have not even had time to read the new spec. From what
you say I would however draw the following conclusions:
1. The jca 1.5 have defined a new contract superceding chapter 8 in the
JMS spec, which means that e
45 matches
Mail list logo
