Bugs item #604916, was opened at 2002-09-05 00:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604916group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lee Schumacher (lelliot)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #604950, was opened at 2002-09-05 10:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604950group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Franco Biaggi (fbiaggi)
Assigned to:
Hi,
I made a patch to the Branch_3_0, but its a while since I did this and I
can't remember which stuff to use for tagging: should I step up
JBoss_3_0_0_8 or Rel_3_0_0_7, which is the tags that seems relevant?
//Peter
--
Peter Antman
Bugs item #605031, was opened at 2002-09-05 13:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=605031group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Renaud Bruyeron (bruyeron)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #605041, was opened at 2002-09-05 15:02
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=605041group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Timo Warns (timow)
Assigned to:
Sorry for the delay,
I think I wasn't clear about what I meant by interceptor based jsr-77
implementation. I don't have a real problem with the existence of a jsr-77
mbean for each jsr-77 object. What I was wondering about was, instead of
having jsr-77 specific code in each base object (ejb
Feature Requests item #605154, was opened at 2002-09-05 14:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=605154group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nadilson (nferreira)
Assigned to:
Hello, guys!
I remember threads on this but don't remember the conclusion (if it
was made).
To support JDBC-3.0 code, I have to decide whether to compile sources
depending on the JDK version.
For now I solve it this way
target name=set-java-version
condition property=jdk1.4
equals
I investigated the code, and wrote something I thought could work:
My version of org/jboss/security/plugins/JaasSecurityManager.java
against jboss 3.0.2 (changes) marked with *:
==
private boolean authenticate(Principal
Number of tests run: 890
Successful tests: 866
Errors:20
Failures: 4
[time of test: 6 September 2002 2:27 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
10 matches
Mail list logo
