> > I'm planning on the following releases so time your work accordingly:
> >
> > 2002-10-25jboss-2.4.10
> > 2002-10-27jboss-3.0.4
> > 2002-11-03jboss-3.2.0beta2 [corrected]
> > 2002-12-22jboss-4.0alpha
> >
> >
> > Scott Stark
> > Chief Technology Officer
>
Anatoly, this looks cool and draws other perspectives. I'm in thought.
Any other thoughts/comments?
Thanks.
alex
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 4:07:15 PM, you wrote:
AA> Hi, Alex
AA> Jelly would give you similar ease of use but without having to write any
AA> XSL. You would initialize the JellyCo
Bugs item #617574, was opened at 2002-10-02 07:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=617574&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Michael Bartmann (bartmann)
Assigned to: Scott
Bugs item #617574, was opened at 2002-10-03 00:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=617574&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Michael Bartmann (bartmann)
Assigned to: Scott
Bugs item #617574, was opened at 2002-10-02 07:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=617574&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Michael Bartmann (bartmann)
Assigned to: Scot
Bugs item #627405, was opened at 2002-10-23 04:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=627405&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Erik Konijnenburg (konijnenburg)
Assigned
Bugs item #617574, was opened at 2002-10-03 00:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=617574&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Michael Bartmann (bartmann)
Assigned to: Scott M
Bugs item #627892, was opened at 2002-10-24 11:19
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=627892&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jon S Bratseth (bratseth)
Assi
Number of tests run: 984
Successful tests: 982
Errors:1
Failures: 1
[time of test: 27 October 2002 12:49 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
just put a doc.txt with your code or put it in a doc directory somewhere
just put the doc
marc f
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:jboss-development-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net] On
> Behalf Of Thomas Peuss
> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 11:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL P
Hello!
If I remember right we should provide docs for new pieces we add to
JBoss. Where should I put this docs?
CU
Thomas
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache ev
Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
Alex Loubyansky wrote:
I am thinking about writting an MBean that will generate
*-service.xml files for datasources.
I see it the following way.
- MBean attributes corresponding to values needed to construct
-service.xml (such as url, driver, user, password, etc);
- X
Hi, Alex
Jelly would give you similar ease of use but without having to write any
XSL. You would initialize the JellyContext by creating in first and then
setting variables in it from attributes like this:
ctx.setVariable(name, value);
(values can be any Java objects)
you load your modified *-
Thanks, Anatoly. I'll check it. Also I thought about Velocity which looks
similar to Jelly from your description, though I am not familiar with the last
one.
Could you, please, look at the following idea with XML/XSL, compare it with
Jelly and give your opinion?
- before transformation, each MB
14 matches
Mail list logo
