[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-630616 ] Subject empty of credentials

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #630616, was opened at 2002-10-29 10:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=630616group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 8 Submitted By: Peter Antman (pra) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] catalina patch 561405 closed

2002-10-30 Thread Bruce Scharlau
Scott, you closed this patch the other day saying that it would be integrated into catalina bundle 3.0.3, and added the directory for net/jndi under catalina for the jboss-head branch. When were you going to add the changed files to cvs?

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-630616 ] Subject empty of credentials

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #630616, was opened at 2002-10-29 09:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=630616group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 8 Submitted By: Peter Antman (pra) Assigned to:

Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] -service.xml generator

2002-10-30 Thread Matt Cleveland
Alex, I'm also curious how this differs from the ServiceBindingManager. I have been using the ServiceBindingManager to put (almost) all of my configuration in a single, fairly simple file. I could give you a short wish list for the ServiceBindingManager, but I don't understand why we need a

Re: [JBoss-dev] catalina patch 561405 closed

2002-10-30 Thread Scott M Stark
They are already there: JBoss3.0 615ls jboss-all/catalina/src/main/org/jboss/net/protocol/jndi/ CVS/ Handler.java* Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Bruce Scharlau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [JBoss-dev] catalina patch 561405 closed

2002-10-30 Thread Bruce Scharlau
At 07:59 30/10/2002 -0800, you wrote: They are already there: JBoss3.0 615ls jboss-all/catalina/src/main/org/jboss/net/protocol/jndi/ CVS/ Handler.java* Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Ah... I thought that module had been

[JBoss-dev] JMS - priority queueing

2002-10-30 Thread T. Subramanian
Hi All, I am using JBoss 3.0.0 version. When I tried with JMS examples that uses the priority , it doesn't work as expected. Following are the steps I have done. In a class used to send JMS messages to a queue I set the priority ranging from 0 -9. I used setJMSPriority(int) method in

Re: [JBoss-dev] catalina patch 561405 closed

2002-10-30 Thread Scott M Stark
jboss-head is a different branch and if that is where you are looking for the file you won't find it yet as it has not made its way from 3.0 and it won't be until after the 3.2beta2 release that it does. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-630616 ] Subject empty of credentials

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #630616, was opened at 2002-10-29 10:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=630616group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 8 Submitted By: Peter Antman (pra) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty bug rear's it's head again

2002-10-30 Thread Scott M Stark
You will have to be more specific because when I add this the following to the jmx-console/WEB-INF/web.xml descriptor FORM based auth works fine. security-constraint web-resource-collection web-resource-nameHtmlAdaptor/web-resource-name descriptionAn example security config that

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 30-October-2002

2002-10-30 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 987 Successful tests: 985 Errors:1 Failures: 1 [time of test: 30 October 2002 12:49 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty bug rear's it's head again

2002-10-30 Thread Dave Smith
Ah .. With the old version of jetty you did not have to prefix the form-login-page with a '/'. If you include the slash it works. On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 14:56, Scott M Stark wrote: You will have to be more specific because when I add this the following to the jmx-console/WEB-INF/web.xml

[JBoss-dev] theserverside bechmark

2002-10-30 Thread Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI Serviços
don't want to start a hot discussion here, but have you see the benchmark made by theserverside about j2ee vs .Net ? well .Net (in the benchmark) is well beyond the j2ee in the results. In the thread of TSS some people that read the code said it used bmp (remote :)) and the document says it was

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-631277 ] build/build.xml run-testsuite fails

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #631277, was opened at 2002-10-30 22:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=631277group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Kimpton (kimptoc) Assigned to: Jason

Re: [JBoss-dev] theserverside bechmark

2002-10-30 Thread Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI Serviços
read http://dreambean.com/petstore.html this is a evaluation of the report by Rickard Oberg Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI Serviços wrote: don't want to start a hot discussion here, but have you see the benchmark made by theserverside about j2ee vs .Net ? well .Net (in the benchmark) is well beyond

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-620514 ] MQ OutOfMemoryException

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #620514, was opened at 2002-10-08 18:18 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=620514group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-620514 ] MQ OutOfMemoryException

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #620514, was opened at 2002-10-08 23:18 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=620514group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-10-30 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.1_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-619171 ] Logging Deadlock

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #619171, was opened at 2002-10-06 00:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=619171group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timur Zambalayev (timurz)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-623223 ] possible deadlock in log4j related code

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #623223, was opened at 2002-10-14 13:45 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=623223group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jerome Lacoste (lacostej) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] jboss daily test failed

2002-10-30 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_06 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-631335 ] JBoss Memory Leak

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #631335, was opened at 2002-10-31 00:32 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=631335group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Shi (johnshi) Assigned to:

RE: [JBoss-dev] JMS - priority queueing

2002-10-30 Thread Hiram Chirino
You are not using the JMS API correctly. Read the JMS spec or post this message to the user forums. Regards, Hiram -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of T. Subramanian Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:54 AM

[JBoss-dev] Container and interceptor redesing

2002-10-30 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I just checked in the first part of the container and interceptor redesign for 4.0, and I want to give the list a status update. The major highlights of this commit follow: - Merged invoke and invokeHome into a the single invoke method. - Remove the EntityPersistenceManager interface, the

[JBoss-dev] Foe deployer in testsuite is broken

2002-10-30 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I think bea has updated the weblogic dtd, and this has broken out testsuite. I have commented out the foe deployer tests in the build.xml until these issues are resolved. Alex when you get this working just search the build.xml file for foe and you will see my changes. I had to change the

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-626717 ] invalid SQL type in standardjbosscmp-jdb

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #626717, was opened at 2002-10-22 16:52 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=626717group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-615667 ] SQLException storing Oracle LONG

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #615667, was opened at 2002-09-28 06:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=615667group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Bonham (bonhamcm) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-619969 ] SQL Server substring syntax is wrong

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #619969, was opened at 2002-10-08 08:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=619969group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vinh Nguyen (softwaremasters) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-572281 ] oracle clob mapping problem

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #572281, was opened at 2002-06-22 06:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=572281group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v4.0 Status: Open Resolution: Postponed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Colin Li (colinl) Assigned to: Dain Sundstrom

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-626717 ] invalid SQL type in standardjbosscmp-jdb

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #626717, was opened at 2002-10-21 23:52 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=626717group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-604518 ] UnifiedClassLoader2 addClass

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #604518, was opened at 2002-09-04 06:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604518group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul W. Ward (pward) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-595672 ] Deserialization broken in JBoss 3.01

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-16 04:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595672group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 8 Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] RE: [ jboss-Bugs-619969 ] SQL Server substring syntax is wrong -reference found

2002-10-30 Thread Jeremy Boynes
SQL Server reference on MSDN shows SUBSTRING ( expression , start , length ) syntax: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/tsqlref/ts_ setu-sus_6btz.asp I can verify this if it would help. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-619969 ] SQL Server substring syntax is wrong

2002-10-30 Thread noreply
Bugs item #619969, was opened at 2002-10-08 08:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=619969group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vinh Nguyen (softwaremasters) Assigned