[JBoss-dev] 网络实名 “分类”,直达山东

2002-10-31 Thread classad
ллä¯ÀÀÍøÒ×·ÖÀàÐÅϢɽ¶«Õ¾£¡£¡ http://classad.163.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirec

[JBoss-dev] 网络实名 “分类”,直达山东

2002-10-31 Thread classad
ллä¯ÀÀÍøÒ×·ÖÀàÐÅϢɽ¶«Õ¾£¡£¡ http://classad.163.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirec

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-631825 ] JDBC parameter setting/getting overhaul

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #631825, was opened at 2002-11-01 11:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=631825&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v4.0 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-631826 ] JDBC parameter getting/setting overhaul

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #631826, was opened at 2002-11-01 11:45 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=631826&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-631821 ] JDBC parameter setting/getting overhaul

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #631821, was opened at 2002-11-01 11:38 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=631821&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anon

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-619969 ] SQL Server substring syntax is wrong

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #619969, was opened at 2002-10-08 08:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=619969&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vinh Nguyen (softwaremasters) Assign

RE: [JBoss-dev] Documentation Patch Question

2002-10-31 Thread Jason Dillon
The best thing to patch right now would be the buildsystem guide and faq. Look in website/content/src/web/default/developers/* --jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Tompkins > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:57 PM

[JBoss-dev] Documentation Patch Question

2002-10-31 Thread Ben Tompkins
Exactly what documentation are we talking about? Is this it? jboss/manual/src/xdocs/jbossdocs.xml If not, please tell me which file(s) you would like me to patch. On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 16:59, Jason Dillon wrote: > > Ok. I can patch the doc with the content of my last mailing "How to > get > >

RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Ben Tompkins
Perhaps I worded this somewhat confusingly - although it seems clear to me (you may want to reread the sentences prior to your comment below). I said that I have not bothered to try building JBoss in an IDE because "it is generally ***harder*** to build ***inside*** an IDE than outside of one." On

RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Jason Dillon
> Ok. I can patch the doc with the content of my last mailing "How to get > it to build." But I will need a cvs account to do that. > > Ben Submit a patch. We do not give up RW for nothing. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: In

RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Ben Tompkins
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 15:06, Jason Dillon wrote: > > Here is a script that ***points vaguely*** in the direction of the > > janitorial task that Jason outlined immediately prior to his evident > > leave of absence. > > Where did I go? Where did I leave my absence anyways? > > > > All it does i

[JBoss-dev] How to get it to build.

2002-10-31 Thread Ben Tompkins
I realize that this elementary material for most of you, but it does address some of the questions I have seen posted over the last week or so on these lists. In order to reach a wider audience I should probably repost this mailing to the forums, AOL, etc... Ok, Branch_3_0 worked (sorry about t

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 31-October-2002

2002-10-31 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 988 Successful tests: 985 Errors:1 Failures: 2 [time of test: 31 October 2002 12:59 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Jason Dillon
> Here is a script that ***points vaguely*** in the direction of the > janitorial task that Jason outlined immediately prior to his evident > leave of absence. Where did I go? Where did I leave my absence anyways? > All it does is gather (by copying - not moving) the > collection of somewhat d

RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Jason Dillon
This is a recent change to the build system. Feel free to submit a patch of the docs. --jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Tompkins > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-621270 ] invalid SQL is generated for MSSQL

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #621270, was opened at 2002-10-10 05:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=621270&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-608790 ] [3.0.2]Hot deploy of unpackaged SAR bug?

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #608790, was opened at 2002-09-13 00:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=608790&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 4 Submitted By: Chris Kimpton (kimptoc) >

RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Matt Munz
Ben, > I'd also like to know whether anyone has succeeded in > building/debugging with Eclipse. http://jboss.org/developers/guides/eclipse-howto/ > is generally harder to build inside > an IDE than outside one - so I haven't even bothered to try it. IMO not true in this case. In fact, JBoss

Re: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Ben Tompkins
Is there some reason why the precise commands required to checkout a correct build cannot simply be posted somewhere? I am using: CVSROOT=pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss cvs login (if necessary) cvs co jboss-head or cvs co -r I see that some recent commits have specified Branch_3_

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-620514 ] MQ OutOfMemoryException

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #620514, was opened at 2002-10-08 18:18 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=620514&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel) Assig

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-604518 ] UnifiedClassLoader2 addClass

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #604518, was opened at 2002-09-04 06:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=604518&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul W. Ward (pward) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] Haydi Oyunu Kullan !

2002-10-31 Thread www.basbakan.org
Title: HAYDÝ OYUNU KULLAN HAYDÝ OYUNU KULLAN !   www.basbakan.org   remove : [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Pro

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-604518 ] UnifiedClassLoader2 addClass

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #604518, was opened at 2002-09-04 08:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=604518&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul W. Ward (pward) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-604518 ] UnifiedClassLoader2 addClass

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #604518, was opened at 2002-09-04 06:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=604518&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul W. Ward (pward) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-604518 ] UnifiedClassLoader2 addClass

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #604518, was opened at 2002-09-04 08:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=604518&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul W. Ward (pward) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-604518 ] UnifiedClassLoader2 addClass

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #604518, was opened at 2002-09-04 06:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=604518&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul W. Ward (pward) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-604518 ] UnifiedClassLoader2 addClass

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #604518, was opened at 2002-09-04 08:11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=604518&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Open Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul W. Ward (pward) Assigned to

[JBoss-dev] JBoss.net and performance tuning

2002-10-31 Thread Matt Munz
CGJ and JBoss.net guys, My fledgeling JBoss.net enabled application is growing up and it needs some performance enhancements. Particularly, Marshalling/Unmarshalling appears to take significantly longer than expected. Here's my setup. 1) I'm using the JMX.net proxy classes used in the tes

Re: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread danch
So, Ben...are you hinting that your less than satisfied with the build system? That's odd, _nobody_ _ever_ complains about the build system! ;^}) yours in sympathy, danch Ben Tompkins wrote: To whom it may concern, Here is a script that ***points vaguely*** in the direction of the janitorial ta

[JBoss-dev] jboss.net status

2002-10-31 Thread Finn, Michael
Title: jboss.net status Guys, Quick question - what is the status of jboss.net WRT Axis 1.0 in: - 3.0 branch? - 3.2 branch? - HEAD? Is Axis 1.0 GA supported anywhere yet? TIA, Mike   Finn, Michael.vcf Description: Binary data

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-630616 ] Subject empty of credentials

2002-10-31 Thread noreply
Bugs item #630616, was opened at 2002-10-29 09:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=630616&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 8 Submitted By: Peter Antman (pra) Assigned to: Sc

[JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Ben Tompkins
To whom it may concern, Here is a script that ***points vaguely*** in the direction of the janitorial task that Jason outlined immediately prior to his evident leave of absence. All it does is gather (by copying - not moving) the collection of somewhat divergently named and distributed README and

Re: [JBoss-dev] Foe deployer in testsuite is broken

2002-10-31 Thread Alex Loubyansky
I see this error. But I can't figure out the cause. I just have checked out HEAD, uncommented foe in testsuite. The first run of 'tests-foe-deployer-unit tests-report' produces the error validating converted weblogic-cmp-rdbms-jar.xml. The second run of 'tests-foe-deployer-unit tests-report' passes