Good question ;-)
but I would guess there is a number of reson:
1. The core developer did not like the JMS spec when it came.
2. XmlBlaster has until today not had an notion of a Queue destination
(that solved now).
3. There is no transaction support in XmlBlaster.
4. I don't think any one has
Bugs item #639064, was opened at 2002-11-15 19:47
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=639064group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Yossarian Nosscire (yosarian1)
Assigned
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Why jboss stops when starting with -c all option when it try to :
13:22:52,604 INFO [ClusterPartition] Connecting to channel
if I remove the cluster-service.xml and jbossha-httpsession.sar it
doesn't stops...
--
| Emerson Cargnin |
| Analista de Sistemas
Bugs item #640195, was opened at 2002-11-18 18:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=640195group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marcin Gryszkalis (dagoon)
Assigned
On Thursday 14 November 2002 10:57 am, Bill Burke wrote:
... Code is in 3.2 and head under
server/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/pooled. If you want to know how to
use this, look at the testsuite under pooled/ test.
Is there any chance that this PooledInvoker in 3.2 can fix my problem
with
Number of tests run: 995
Successful tests: 987
Errors:7
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2002-11-18.11-56 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Is ok and easy to use jboss forum at my own company???
--
| Emerson Cargnin |
| Analista de Sistemas Sr. |
| Tel : (051) 3358-4959|
| SICREDI Serviços |
| Porto Alegre - Brasil|
|xx|
The Pooled Invoker pools threads up to a maximum limit, after that new
threads are still created but are allowed to die after they service a
request. (I guess I should block, but I didn't want to have a hard limit.)
In other words, this won't help you
But...your problem seems related to
Hello Emerson,
Monday, November 18, 2002, 9:11:55 PM, you wrote:
ECSS Is ok and easy to use jboss forum at my own company???
forums are still in dev and are lgpl, but you are welcome
to use them, provide feedbacks and contribute.
--
Best regards,
julien
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
The Pooled Invoker pools threads up to a maximum limit, after that new
threads are still created but are allowed to die after they service a
request. (I guess I should block, but I didn't want to have a hard limit.)
Minor nitpick, but when you reach
I use a LRU pool. Please see previous emails or examine code if you want
more details.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam
Heath
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] new
what version of jboss forum is currently being used at jboss site?
other question: what module is it on...
julien viet wrote:
Hello Emerson,
Monday, November 18, 2002, 9:11:55 PM, you wrote:
ECSS Is ok and easy to use jboss forum at my own company???
forums are still in dev and are lgpl, but
Emerson,
HEAD is used
Monday, November 18, 2002, 10:54:14 PM, you wrote:
ECSS what version of jboss forum is currently being used at jboss site?
ECSS other question: what module is it on...
ECSS julien viet wrote:
Hello Emerson,
Monday, November 18, 2002, 9:11:55 PM, you wrote:
ECSS Is
Hello, All!
[This is just a submission to the JBoss Online BrainBase.]
After pulling my hair out the last two days, I fixed my problem.
With my ant/xdoclet build process that put my EJB's in one jar, my
servlets/jsp's in another and EAR'ed the whole thing (as opposed to some
other way I didn't
Bugs item #637269, was opened at 2002-11-12 10:04
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=637269group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: rodelor (rodelor)
Assigned to: Adrian Brock
Bugs item #634286, was opened at 2002-11-06 17:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634286group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ole Husgaard (sparre)
Assigned to: Bill Burke
Bugs item #634286, was opened at 2002-11-06 02:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634286group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ole Husgaard (sparre)
Assigned to: Bill Burke
I
agree.. same socket bi-directionality is exotic and does not have to be in the
public interface.
Currently,it's not very nice how the proxy going back client gets
setup. I won't go into detailsabout the current way I do it (it
sucks).
Here's the route I
hope I can change too soon:
1)
19 matches
Mail list logo
