i'm moving them to org.jboss.util.naming to match all the other naming
related package names.
It will probably take a day or two to get into cvs since this is wrapped up
with the tm logging implementation.
david jencks
On 2002.11.23 22:30:46 -0500 Scott M Stark wrote:
> These are common JNDI uti
These are common JNDI utility stuff that does not depend on the JNDI implementation
details so it should be in common, say in a org.jboss.util.jndi package.
The org.jboss.naming package in server exists because the jnp implementation of JNDI
existed standalone prior to jboss. In 4.0 this will move
I'd like to use org.jboss.naming.NonSerializableFactory in the transaction
module. However, it is currently in the server module, built after the tx
module. I'd like to move it. Where is the best place?
common -- seems good, is it OK to have jndi utilities there since we can
run without jndi?
Bugs item #642250, was opened at 2002-11-22 04:04
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=642250&group_id=22866
>Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Phil Cornelius (smapjb)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #641155, was opened at 2002-11-20 03:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=641155&group_id=22866
Category: None
>Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Giles Paterson (gpaterson)
>Assigned to
There is no cached information unless you invoked
the security manager isValid method.
If you are doing the LoginContext then you are
effectively replacing the security manager
and only using the configured login module. You
should be looking up the security
manager rather than doing the logi
Patches item #642867, was opened at 2002-11-23 22:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=642867&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Laurent Etiemble (letiemble)
A
Number of tests run: 995
Successful tests: 987
Errors:7
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2002-11-23.11-56 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[java
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 12:20 PM, Stefan Arentz wrote:
Dain, what you need is more real use-cases. This is really basic stuff
which is used in most applications today. I'll be happy to provide you
with more examples of such code that is now performing less optimal in
JBoss. I might
Dain,
I'm throwing this on the mailing list because I think it is a an
interesting subject to discuss there. And there are also more people on
the list with similar issues. Hope you don't mind :-)
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 05:37 AM, Dain wrote:
On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 04:21 PM
Bugs item #639102, was opened at 2002-11-15 21:04
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=639102&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Don Lind (dlind)
Assigned to: Da
Bugs item #642615, was opened at 2002-11-23 02:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=642615&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeremy Boynes (jboynes)
>Assigned to: Alexe
12 matches
Mail list logo
