JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1050
Successful tests: 1042
Errors:7
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2003-01-10.08-22 GMT]
[java.version:
This change appears to have broken the org.jboss.test.mdb.test.MDBUnitTestCase as seen
in the latest 3.2 test results. Look into this testcase please.
Suite: MDBUnitTestCase
Test:testQueue(org.jboss.test.mdb.test.MDBUnitTestCase)
Type:error
Exception:
The important thing is to not put half of the GUI into Java classes,
like most MVC frameworks.
I took a look at Struts, but I assumed that it will create far too many
classes and require restarting the web app over and over again (to
reload the classes and/or the configuration file). A lot of my
Hi,
Is there some sort of benchmarking on the site as it is currently?
It'd be cool to see a before and after picture. I'm not making any
point or anything, its purely intellectual curiosity.
-Andy
marc fleury wrote:
holger,
we totally agree and we are talking about the same thing. I
Scott,
It looks like my change collided with change to MDBUnitTestCase made by ejort (Fix the
testsuite so that the cache is empty after the run). I'll try to fix this asap.
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:51 AM
To:
The beans which worked on 3.0.2 and failed
on 3.0.4 also fails on 3.0.5rc1 I just tested that.
I am forced to go back to 3.0.2 until the
bug related to fields of type java.lang.Object is fixed.
Randahl
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
That sure is a constructive suggestion. I currently use the default
mapping which stores serialized java.lang.Object instances as LONG
BINARY - is there a relevant alternative?
Again, the mapping worked fine under 3.0.2 - what changed in 3.0.4?
Would somebody please care to comment on that?
I am playing with JBoss 3.0.5 from CVS and have found that if I use the
datasource name different from DefaultDS, I have to modify jaws.xml and
jbosscmp-jdbc.xml inside the jbossweb-ejb.jar.
Should we distribute this as directory instead of archive?
Or better is it possible to remove/comment
Bugs item #664635, was opened at 2003-01-08 15:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664635group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Morris (rpmorris)
Assigned to: Scott
Bugs item #663934, was opened at 2003-01-07 19:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=663934group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned
Bugs item #665870, was opened at 2003-01-10 11:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=665870group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to:
I just updated and its building find. Post the error your seeing.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jboss-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10,
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 11:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=665183group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=665183group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664635, was opened at 2003-01-08 20:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664635group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Morris (rpmorris)
Assigned to: Scott
Bugs item #664635, was opened at 2003-01-08 12:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664635group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Morris (rpmorris)
Assigned to: Scott
In the early days of Java, I read that a large retailer had about 70 Java
programmers because it was a business decision. It was the only tool
available that they could use to integrate their systems.
Most likely, Marc's decision to use PHP on the website is a business decision
as well. The
Title: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
+1. Very Nice.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, marc fleury wrote:
I pulled out my changes. Sorry for the troubles.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Fedorenko
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-cvs]
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jms JMSContainerInvoker.java
Scott,
It looks like my
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, marc fleury wrote:
[snip]
Hmm. There broken links on the site. Some stale .jsp(team.jsp(from the front
page) is a 404).
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =
Bugs item #664547, was opened at 2003-01-08 10:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664547group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle VanderBeek (kylev)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664547, was opened at 2003-01-08 13:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664547group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle VanderBeek (kylev)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #664547, was opened at 2003-01-08 10:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664547group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle VanderBeek (kylev)
Assigned to:
We are fixing them ASAP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam
Heath
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:14 PM
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
Subject: Broken links - Re: [JBoss-dev] PHP problems
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003,
Bugs item #664547, was opened at 2003-01-08 10:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=664547group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle VanderBeek (kylev)
Assigned to:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1012
Successful tests: 1006
Errors:5
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2003-01-10.14-55 GMT]
[java.version:
Your kinda right. the loop is there for the case where the destination is
queue based (p2p and durable subs). The polling happens when the queue is
full. Now when the queue is not full (or in the pub sub case, there is no
queue), then the thread goes into asynch mode and it waits for the
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
- Original Message -
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:21 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-cvs]
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jms JMSContainerInvoker.java
This change appears to have broken the
29 matches
Mail list logo
