I don't think EJB can access its container directly.
However maybe you could add an interceptor in stack that does nothing
but provides you information you need, because they have access
to container. Then your EJB could contact interceptor (with static
call for instance)
Maybe is it possible via
I'm pretty confused about what exactly you are trying to do, since
there is already an instance variable ejbModule and and accessors
get/setEjbModule in the Container class.
??
david jencks
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 01:36 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I am trying to write an EJBTestCase
Feature Requests item #677512, was opened at 2003-01-30 15:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=677512group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: ryan sonnek (wireframe6464)
Assigned
Yes but it is not exposed on the MBean interface, so how do you get a
reference to the module unless you already have a real reference to the
container?
-dain
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 06:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm pretty confused about what exactly you are trying to do, since
David Jencks wrote
I'm pretty confused about what exactly you are trying to do, since
there is already an instance variable ejbModule and and accessors
get/setEjbModule in the Container class.
I am trying to unit test changes to JDBCEJBQLCompiler by comparing the SQL
generated to known
Why not? I see no reason why a client can't look up the EJB container
directly using an MBean and get some information. I can see why this
would be a bad idea, but we shouldn't restrict the access. Anyway this
is for some test code.
-dain
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 04:23 AM, julien
Patches item #677603, was opened at 2003-01-30 19:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=677603group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ville Skyttä (scop)
Assigned to:
Thanks - I copied the code to get the registry into the test setup and it
worked like a charm.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev]
Feature Requests item #677614, was opened at 2003-01-30 12:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=677614group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Ward (dward2)
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1024
Successful tests: 1019
Errors:5
Failures: 0
[time of test: 2003-01-30.15-01 GMT]
[java.version:
Patches item #677807, was opened at 2003-01-30 17:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=677807group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Vladyslav Kosulin (kosulin)
OK, it worked like a charm in the HEAD branch.
In 3.2 I get a NoSuchMethodException when calling get(name) on the registry:
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: Unable to locate method for:
get(,javax.management.ObjectName)
at
Someone left the get method out of the ModelMBeanInfo for the
registry. I'm checking for problems, then I'll add it to 3.2. I'm
less enthusiastic about 3.0.
david jencks
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 06:27 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
OK, it worked like a charm in the HEAD branch.
In 3.2
OK.
3.2 is fine for me.
Thanks
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Accessing Container from an EJB?
Someone left the get
Patches item #677882, was opened at 2003-01-30 16:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=677882group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dominik Kacprzak (dominikos)
Assigned
15 matches
Mail list logo