Julien,
Is this JAI, as in Java Advanced Imaging? What are you using this for in Nukes?
I'd like to use JAI in JBoss Media. Maybe it's a good idea to put these jars in
thirdparty, what do you think?
Thanks in advance,
Ricardo Argüello
- Original Message -
From: "Julien Viet" <[EMAIL
Bugs item #685329, was opened at 2003-02-12 15:29
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=685329&group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dr. Domagoj Cosic (domic)
Assigned to: Hans
thanks, I meant jca-sar/META-INF/jboss-service.xml
It was working for me yesterday but I haven't updated since Bill's checkin.
Don't see why that would affect this. This code has been there for at
least several weeks...
david jencks
On 2003.02.14 16:01 Scott Rehorn wrote:
> Looks like jboss-
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] is head all messed up?
Looks like jboss-local-jdbc.rar:
2003-02-14 11:31:35,640 ERROR [org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner] Failed to deploy: org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner$DeployedURL@da28e63d{ url="" HREF="" TARGET="_blank">file:/D:/
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1026
Successful tests: 1023
Errors:2
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2003-02-14.12-05 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
Ok I found some issues with a clean checkout that should be fixed now.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Phelps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 14,
Odd, this should be supplied from an entity resolver (see
connector/src/resources/jboss-jca/META-INF/jboss-service.xml). What was
getting deployed at the time?
david jencks
On 2003.02.14 14:37 Scott Rehorn wrote:
> Another data point:
>
> I am seeing numerous errors on startup too, even with r
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] is head all messed up?
Another data point:
I am seeing numerous errors on startup too, even with run -c default. This is with a jdk1.3 build from a new head checkout on Win2k Pro this morning.
Looks like the error is that 403s are causing dtd validations to fail. I
Bugs item #686739, was opened at 2003-02-14 12:35
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=686739&group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bernie Wing (wingba)
Assigned to
I don't disagree, but running units tests as part of the unified testsuite is just
as important. Having unit tests in isolation of the overall testsuite really will
not help the quality of the codebase in the long run.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
I can set up so that running /build/build.sh tests runs all module build
suites and the main testsuite and put all results in the
testsuite/output/reports. This should be pretty easy, I can do it this
weekend.
I really think that encouraging people to write actual unit tests by making
it really e
C:\source>cvs co -r Branch_3_2 jboss-3.2
... the checkout stuff ...
C:\source>cd jboss-3.2\build
C:\source\jboss-3.2\build>build.bat
... the build stuff ...
BUILD FAILED with the error I mentioned before.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Sc
Its true that the main problem is xdoclet here. Its also the reason for a bug
report about excessive memory usage during compilation. We need to
have a comprehensive testsuite for the reason that Bill states, we cannot
rely on a developer having to run individual module tests to validate system
wid
There file is there so are you sure you did a clean check out as opposed to
an update without the -d option?
management 247>cvs status
src/main/org/jboss/management/j2ee/factory/RARModuleFactory.java
===
File: RARModuleFactory.java
stephan reich has been working
on this. Its not Branch_3_0_0 BTW, its Branch_3_0, maybe that is your
problem.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Finn, MichaelSent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:16
PMTo: Jboss-Development-List
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] The new "tests" target
>
>
> The testsuite is just not scalable, Bill, and is inappropriate
What's the status of the ecperf
module? I was trying to test against a 3.0.x server using Branch_3_0_0), but it looks like 3.2 stuff. It deploys a *-ds.xml file for the
datasource - which I didn't think there was a deployer for until 3.2. Though
there is a 3.0-looking datasource deploy file i
Igor,
That did it. Never overlook the
obvious I suppose.
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-From: Igor Fedorenko
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February 14,
2003 10:28 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [JBoss-dev] Slightly OT : Eclipse sourcepath
Did you try to
The testsuite is just not scalable, Bill, and is inappropriate for module
level unit tests. Having the compile take 5-10 minutes for running just
one test is ludicrous.
If you want to object, object to the change note when I announced this
facility.
I will see about getting all the module tests
I just check out a fresh copy of jboss-3.2 from CVS (CVS co -r
Branch_3_2 jboss-3.2) and tried to build it. I keep getting this error
which is causing the build to fail.
C:\source\jboss-3.2\management\src\main\org\jboss\management\j2ee\factor
y\RARModuleFactory.java:12: package org.jboss.resource
Please put these tests in the testsuite. We need nightly reports on the
stability of JBoss. Plus, if they aren't integrated with testsuite you risk
somebody breaking your code with a new change to the core.
Again, put these tests in testuiste
Thanks,
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
Bugs item #686611, was opened at 2003-02-14 16:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=686611&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: roberto (rroberto)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonym
Bugs item #684605, was opened at 2003-02-11 14:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=684605&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marek Drejak (marekdrejak)
Assigned to: David Jen
Hi,
I'm trying to use the new "tests" target for JBoss-Media (CVS module: jboss-media).
I need to access files with media to do some unit testing. I'm doing it this way:
>From jboss-head/media/src/test/org/jboss/media/JBossMediaUnitTestCase.java:
...
ClassLoader classLoader = Thread.currentThre
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sacha
> Labourey
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is really really good
>
>
> > > Why is this unfortunate? I thought it w
Sorry for the off topic,
but...
Trying to get Eclipse to
recognize additional source directories and thought with the heavy use of
XDoclet around here, more than one of you has figured this
out.
Our XDoclet generated
Java source goes to a dir other than the main source tree (build/gen-s
Bugs item #678189, was opened at 2003-01-31 16:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=678189&group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hans Dockter (hans_d)
Assigned to: Hans Dockt
Bugs item #678185, was opened at 2003-01-31 16:45
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=678185&group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hans Dockter (hans_d)
Assigned to: Hans Doc
Bugs item #680951, was opened at 2003-02-05 16:02
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=680951&group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Xavier Poinsard (xpoinsard)
Assigned to: H
Bugs item #685329, was opened at 2003-02-12 15:29
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=685329&group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dr. Domagoj Cosic (domic)
Assigned to: Han
Bugs item #684080, was opened at 2003-02-10 19:08
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=684080&group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jonathan O\'Connor (ninki)
Assigned to: Ha
JBoss-IDE 1.0.1 is now, thanks to new features in Eclipse 2.1.0 M5, a
pure plug-in solution. Vice versa it will only run with Eclipse 2.1.0
M5 and greater.
You DON'T need to download directly from sourceforge as we now use the
Install/Update Manager from Eclipse.
You will find more about that in
Bugs item #685329, was opened at 2003-02-12 09:29
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=685329&group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dr. Domagoj Cosic (domic)
Assigned to: Hans Doc
Patches item #686501, was opened at 2003-02-14 12:55
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=686501&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sven Boeckelmann (svenboeckelmann)
Assigned to: N
Bugs item #665013, was opened at 2003-01-09 13:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665013&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Markus Menner (morphace)
Assigned to: Nobody/Ano
Bugs item #665013, was opened at 2003-01-09 13:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665013&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Markus Menner (morphace)
Assigned to: Nobody/Ano
I had this type of discussion when I first joined these lists,
it was regarding the use of the volatile keyword with Ole. I
hope this summary helps to shed some light on the problem.
The double checking issue has two problems, the one relevant
to this discussion is the behaviour of processor cach
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1088
Successful tests: 1079
Errors:7
Failures: 2
[time of test: 2003-02-14.07-18 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.1_
38 matches
Mail list logo
