Re: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is really really good

2003-02-15 Thread Igor Fedorenko
David Jencks wrote: On 2003.02.15 09:57 Igor Fedorenko wrote: David Jencks wrote: The design goal is to produce a working dtm that does not make unnecesary inter-vm calls. The functionality of the client side tx interceptor appears to be unavailable with the CORBA OTS if we do not writ

RE: [JBoss-dev] is head all messed up?

2003-02-15 Thread David Jencks
Thanks, I think this is fixed. Learning dom4j and xpath is taking a little while... david jencks On 2003.02.14 16:01 Scott Rehorn wrote: > Looks like jboss-local-jdbc.rar: > > 2003-02-14 11:31:35,640 ERROR > [org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner] Failed to deploy: > org.jboss.depl

Re: [JBoss-dev] Problem with the 3.0 branch testsuite

2003-02-15 Thread David Jencks
I've checked in what I think Adrian intended and the rest of my patch, I think, if cvs is acting right. When I ran the testsuite locally before these checkins there was only ONE error, from the wont-fix mbean missing class testcase. Scott, can you run the 3.0 tests to make sure everything got che

Re: [JBoss-dev] Problem with the 3.0 branch testsuite

2003-02-15 Thread David Jencks
Adrian added this, I figured out how to fix it and will commit shortly. CVS is acting very strangely, and I ran into a similar problem. I added a file (cvs add) but it is not showing up when I do cvs update. I suspect the same thing happened to Adrian. david jencks On 2003.02.15 19:38 Scott M

[JBoss-dev] Problem with the 3.0 branch testsuite

2003-02-15 Thread Scott M Stark
It looks like some new tests are not completely checked in as the following errors are due to missing org.jboss.test.entity.interfaces. If you added this test check that the added files have been committed. compile-classes-only: [mkdir] Created dir: /usr/local/jboss/JBoss3.0/jboss-all/testsuit

Re: [JBoss-dev] Branch_3_2 build of manamgement module fails with clean checkout

2003-02-15 Thread Scott M Stark
This was fixed yesterday. I just tried a build of a clean checkout and it works fine. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: "Partner, Jonas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jboss-Development (E-mail)" <

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_2 WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 15-February-2003

2003-02-15 Thread scott . stark
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 1093 Successful tests: 1082 Errors:7 Failures: 4 [time of test: 2003-02-15.21-31 GMT] [java.version: 1.4.1_

[JBoss-dev] Branch_3_2 build of manamgement module fails with clean checkout

2003-02-15 Thread Partner, Jonas
Using JDK1.4.1 on windows a clean checkout of Branch_3_2 the management module fails to build with the following error. Regards Jonas Partner [javac] Compiling 161 source files to C:\CVS-modules\manual\try2\jboss-3.2\m anagement\output\classes C:\CVS-modules\manual\try2\jboss-3.2\management\

Re: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is really really good

2003-02-15 Thread David Jencks
On 2003.02.15 09:57 Igor Fedorenko wrote: > > > David Jencks wrote: > > The design goal is to produce a working dtm that does not make > unnecesary > > inter-vm calls. The functionality of the client side tx interceptor > > appears to be unavailable with the CORBA OTS if we do not write some > c

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-586784 ] memory leak

2003-02-15 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #586784, was opened at 2002-07-25 21:34 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=586784&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: zzhb (zzhb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anony

[JBoss-dev] AMERICANS: Get the IRS Off Your Back -- LEGALLY! 7303IUEo0-602ebCX-16

2003-02-15 Thread Mark2244t61
AMERICANS: Get the IRS off your BACK -- LEGALLY! = THE SECRET the IRS is *TERRIFIED* you'll learn! YOU OWE NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX - and never have! Millions of Americans already have learned the truth and have dropped OUT of the system - (the IRS itself n

Re: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is really really good

2003-02-15 Thread Igor Fedorenko
David Jencks wrote: The design goal is to produce a working dtm that does not make unnecesary inter-vm calls. The functionality of the client side tx interceptor appears to be unavailable with the CORBA OTS if we do not write some client side stuff. Here is the sequence of events for a call be