Hi, Iam getting the following exception, but its not consistent, When they
occur if I clear the server all temp dir and restart the server it works
fine, can any one help me out with this? :-
JBoss version 3.0.0 integrated with tomcat 4.0.3 and JDK version is 1.3
[java.naming.provider.url:loca
Bugs item #693326, was opened at 2003-02-26 12:04
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=693326&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Wallis (bwallis42)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #693311, was opened at 2003-02-26 00:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=693311&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mike Youngstrom (youngm)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Bugs item #693239, was opened at 2003-02-25 23:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=693239&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Pasch (aanno)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #682511, was opened at 2003-02-07 19:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=682511&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Cotton (bcotton969)
Assigned to: David Jenck
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1049
Successful tests: 1044
Errors:1
Failures: 4
[time of test: 2003-02-25.12-05 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
Bugs item #682511, was opened at 2003-02-07 19:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=682511&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Cotton (bcotton969)
Assigned to: David Jenc
Oh, you just want invoker interceptors for generic tx importation. I guess
this is fine.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram
> Chirino
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInt
Maybe we're confusing 2 issues here:
1. writing a maintainable usable jboss dtm
2. supporting corba etc.
I realize I am not entirely comfortable with the client interceptors, and I
notice that they are not really used in the local proxies. I don't think
my idea of using the client interceptor
I though what I sugested was KISS. Tx imporation is
currently done at the invoker level. I want to keep
it there but make it plugable via interceports at the
invoker level.
I guess it would be more KISS to just duplicate the
code that is in the trunk invoker over to all ther
other java based tra
What
I'm saying is, why add this complication? Do we really need it?
KISS.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
Hiram ChirinoSent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:23
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [JBoss-dev] TxIntercept
How about implementing some kind of seperate interceptor framwork around the client side and server side invocation layers??
David, if yoiu had a configurable way to plug in your tx interceptors at the invocation layer you would be ok right? I think david just needs to avoid duplicating the code t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
> since sliced bread
>
>
> On 2003.02.24 14:35 Bill
> well, aside from my and babelfish's inability to translate that...
Yeah... That's because I did a mistake... Shame... It is not "Ortille", but
"Ortie", which means "nettle". That gives:
"Maybe I am pushing Grand Mother in the nettles" (i.e. maybe I go too
far...)
> 1. I was planning to move th
Interceptors seem reasonable, as long as there are no hidden costs behind
them. Why not keep them seperated and more flexible? Also allows
invokers to become a little bit simpler. The only down (aside from any
performance & client-side class loading issues) are the read code as a
story fluff
On 2003.02.25 02:58 Sacha Labourey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This discussion is somehow strange because, and I agree with David: you
> don't seem to be speaking about the same thing at the same time...
> Asynchronous argumentation is hard to follow...
>
> - I think we should have interceptors
> - Yes
Title: SMSNET MELODI GRAFIK HABERLER
24 Þubat 2003www.melodilerim.com / www.grafiklerim.com Allý Turnam Gülpembe - Barýþ Manço Arap Saçý - Erkin Koray Bir Kulunu Çok Sevdim - Ýbrahim Tatlýses Alyazmalým - Cahit Berkay Kum Gibi - Ahmet Kaya Düþler Sokaðý -Ezginin Günlüðü Whenever Wherever
企业如何应用计算机互联网进行网上的营销活动
电子邮件推广作为互联网上最有效的宣传模式，怎样搜索有价值的信息？如何找到更多的潜在客户？如何让更多的客户了解您？一切都变得简单。
在广告效果、价格、效率几方面的综合评测表明，其性价比均高出报纸和电视广告的数百倍乃至上千倍。
作为一家专业从事商业电子邮件服务的网络公司，我们一直致力于帮助中小企业创造网上直销及广告宣传新领域，优质的服务获得了广泛的好评。
一 [邮件地址出售]
全国7000万邮件地址：
全部7000万/500元
（国内个人用户Email地址共计7000万）
全国2000万分行业、地区企业邮
Bugs item #692817, was opened at 2003-02-25 09:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=692817&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simone (milasx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobod
Bugs item #692157, was opened at 2003-02-24 10:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=692157&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Laurent Wozniak (lwozniak)
Assigned t
Hello,
This discussion is somehow strange because, and I agree with David: you
don't seem to be speaking about the same thing at the same time...
Asynchronous argumentation is hard to follow...
- I think we should have interceptors
- Yes, but the sky is blue
- No! Invokers can't handle DTM in
21 matches
Mail list logo
