What is up with the unified interception framework? I assume this will
be part of it yes?
--jason
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 02:14 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I don't need to move it anymore, because I'm going to put my new code
in server. I think this will need to be moved when we get mor
I don't need to move it anymore, because I'm going to put my new code
in server. I think this will need to be moved when we get more of the
persistence engine moved, because we use MarshalledValue for BLOBs.
-dain
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 12:57 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why not add it to
Not working here...
I also saw a post about this on the xdoclet list but no response yet.
> From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:13:55 -0600
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4.1 on OS X out and breaks build
>
> I j
Why not add it to system?
--jason
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I have another issue now... should have checked before sending this
email.
I have a written new basic service ObjectCopier, which is an MBean
that knows how to *efficiently* deep copy objects. T
I am currently using 1.4.1 p10. I will download the latest ASAP.
--jason
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I just upgraded to 1.4.1 on OS X and now the build won't work. I tried
a fresh checkout, but that didn't help. Jason is this working on your
mac.
-dain
I just upgraded to 1.4.1 on OS X and now the build won't work. I tried
a fresh checkout, but that didn't help. Jason is this working on your
mac.
-dain
bash-2.05a$ java -version
java version "1.4.1_01"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_01-39)
Java HotSpot(TM) Clie
Not based on my testing. Any elements must still be declared.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Luke Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 10:50
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1120
Successful tests: 1110
Errors:10
Failures: 0
[time of test: 2003-03-11.01-42 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.1
I don't think there should be any services in common, only utility type
classes. The server module seems like the approriate place for core utility
services that are not needed by the bootstrap server footprint.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xxx
> I would like to move the org.jboss.invocation.MarshalledValue* to the
> commons package, so it can be used by non-ejb dependent code.
good point
marcf
> Does any
> have an issue with this? Does this create a problem for client jars?
>
> -dain
>
>
>
> ---
Online gambling is taking off! In 2002 alone, the Online
Casino industry earned over $3 billion, and is expected to
skyrocket to over $5 billion annually by the end of 2003.
We've partnered with three of the top online casinos,
and we'll give you your very own "Online Gaming Portal"
where your v
I have another issue now... should have checked before sending this
email.
I have a written new basic service ObjectCopier, which is an MBean that
knows how to *efficiently* deep copy objects. This means that I track
metadata so we can avoid serialize/ deserialize. Anyway, I wanted add
this
I would like to move the org.jboss.invocation.MarshalledValue* to the
commons package, so it can be used by non-ejb dependent code. Does any
have an issue with this? Does this create a problem for client jars?
-dain
---
This sf.net email i
Change Notes item #701282, was opened at 2003-03-10 18:03
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=701282&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Leave this to me as I need to update this class for the changes made to the jsr77
layer.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Fedorenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: M
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1067
Successful tests: 1061
Errors:2
Failures: 4
[time of test: 2003-03-10.13-20 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1120
Successful tests: 1106
Errors:14
Failures: 0
[time of test: 2003-03-10.20-42 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.1
mån 2003-03-10 klockan 21.15 skrev Scott M Stark:
> I have not tested the java2ParentDelegaton addition, but yes this can only come
> in at the loader repository level which is either the cache or the ordering
> of the class loaders as determined by getPackageClassLoaders. If java2ParentDelegaton
>
Bugs item #701106, was opened at 2003-03-10 20:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=701106&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rod Burgett (rodburgett)
Assigned to: Nobody/
I have not tested the java2ParentDelegaton addition, but yes this can only come
in at the loader repository level which is either the cache or the ordering
of the class loaders as determined by getPackageClassLoaders. If java2ParentDelegaton
is false, then the child loader repository's should not l
Another question, org.jboss.management.j2ee.cluster.HAManagementService has
"DefaultPartition" hardcoded and there seem to be no way to configure it. Should I fix
this too?
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:37 AM
> To:
Bugs item #700211, was opened at 2003-03-08 20:01
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=700211&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ryan Hoegg (rhoegg)
Assigned to: Nob
Hi,
I saw you changes in cvs regarding mx.loading. Great that you are
relaxing the signature restriction! But I also saw that you have added
the possibility to let the heirirachical load from parent first; this
would be a welcome addition and might perhaps make it a little bit
easier to live with
I wonder why dynamic proxy const is not cached, for instance in
BaseLocalProxyFctory.
switching :
InvocationHandler ih = new InvocationHandlerImpl();
Proxy.newProxyInstance(classloader, new Class[]{itf.class}, ih);
to the code :
InvocationHandler ih = new InvocationHandlerImpl();
cstr.newInstan
Just use Check Out As... to check out HEAD and name it something like
"JBoss HEAD". Next, just use Check Out As... again and check out the 3.2
branch into something like "JBoss 3.2". That way both branches can be in
the same workspace at the same time.
-Phil
Bugs item #693239, was opened at 2003-02-25 23:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=693239&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Pasch (aanno)
Assigned to:
Just curious if anyone has had time to look at the dependency-manager
task usage in the buildmagic-2.0 tree?
If not could I get a few peeps to have a look and give me some feedback
on how well it works to download depends to build this project?
cvs get -r buildmagic-2_0 buildmagic
cd buildmag
27 matches
Mail list logo
