Again, could somebody please backport this to the 3.0 and 3.2 branches?
Thanks in advance,
Ricardo Arguello
- Original Message -
From: "Ricardo Arg?ello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 2:37 AM
Subject: [jboss-cvs] jboss/src/bin shutdown.bat
>
Hi,
I enabled the Hotspot Server VM in run.bat.
It was already enabled in run.sh (with some bash magic to test if we are using a Sun
JVM... Don't know how to do that in a batch file, does anybody know, so we don't
hardcode Sun's JVM?)
It would be interesting to test if there is a significant s
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
The final release candidate prior to the final relase of 3.2.0 is available from
SourceForge here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
The release notes are available here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=13
Scott Stark
Doh! I see, I didn't commit common/build.xml
+1 Guiness for me, sorry.
Regards,
Adrian
From: "Adrian Brock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2 build broken for a while
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:32:58 +
Bloody CVS merge putting jb
I don't know so I just made the dependency to jmx all on the jmx
module rather than needing the RI classes.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Brock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PR
Bloody CVS merge putting jboss.jmx back in!
Why didn't common compile over Sun's RI,
it did for me?
Regards,
Adrian
From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2 build broken for a while
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 13:35:44 -
Tom Coleman wrote:
Don't be too sure that there isn't a number of months of effort to pass the
conformance suite. There are lots of edge cases and areas of interpretation
when implementing from a spec.
Unless they give the compliance testing to Bill Burke. He could probably
get it done in a
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1154
Successful tests: 1147
Errors:7
Failures: 0
[time of test: 2003-03-22.21-35 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_
>
> Don't be too sure that there isn't a number of months of effort to pass the
> conformance suite. There are lots of edge cases and areas of interpretation
> when implementing from a spec.
>
Unless they give the compliance testing to Bill Burke. He could probably
get it done in a weekend.
tools/etc/xdoclet/templates/mbean-custom.j has been updated in 3.2 to use
the org.jboss.mx.util.ObjectNameFactory and the build is working again.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "David Jenc
tools/etc/xdoclet/templates/mbean-custom.xdt
david
On 2003.03.22 15:44 Scott M Stark wrote:
> The removal of the logging from jmx and switching of dependency ordering
> between common and jmx has broken the build until this is resolved. One
> complication in doing this is the fact that the xdocl
The removal of the logging from jmx and switching of dependency ordering
between common and jmx has broken the build until this is resolved. One
complication in doing this is the fact that the xdoclet generated mbeans
are referencing a org.jboss.util.jmx.ObjectNameFactory:
public static final java
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
Thanks Stephen!!!
/L
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Coy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 4:15 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Branch_3_0 has been updated to xdoclet 1.2
> As a consequence, we needed ant 1.5, so that has been incorporated as
> wel
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
We've started talking about doing this
about a six months ago. But it has never been
a priority.
The original reason for the separate implementation
was that Juha wanted jbossmx to run standalone
without other jboss jars, and at the time
common's logging couldn't be turned off
and so required log4j
Hi,
Commit option C was broken by the removal of the
passivation thread. It self deadlockeds.
Not guilty, but I'm fixing it as penance
for my dyslexic canPassivate() method :-)
Regards,
Adrian
From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [J
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
21 matches
Mail list logo
