===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
[javac]
Bugs item #733173, was opened at 2003-05-06 11:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by slaboure
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=733173group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Simple thread management, no transaction stuff.
Basically, for an SMTP server the request handlers will have to be thread
managed of course. The streams will then need to be closed. I don't really
need it to be managed separately from the SMTP service and I'm not sure I
want it to be.
-Andy
Bugs item #749586, was opened at 2003-06-05 17:08
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=749586group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Sacha Labourey wrote:
User: slaboure
Date: 03/06/05 06:26:17
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment Tag: Branch_3_2
DeploymentSorter.java SubDeployerSupport.java
Log:
Add features that allows to have JAR (dir or file) deployment that ends in ".last"
Title: Message
if you have more services, then put them like this:
deploy/deploy.last/service1.xml
deploy/deploy.last/service2.xml
deploy/deploy.last/service3.xml
deploy/deploy.last/service4.xml
deploy/deploy.last/service5.xml
deploy/deploy.last/service6.xml
If you don't like "last", simply
Bugs item #747650, was opened at 2003-06-02 17:55
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=747650group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Title: Transactions from outside the jboss jvm
I'm having trouble working with UserTransactions from outside the jboss jvm. My situation is this: On application server A I have a servlet that performs some work via stateless session beans deployed on application server A. The servlet also
Bugs item #742633, was opened at 2003-05-24 04:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lhankins
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=742633group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
[junit] Running
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1240
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.735
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 773
Hello All,
I am trying to integrate UDDI into JBoss under
jboss.net I want to know how to run the testcases
under jboss.net. When I run jboss.head/build/build.sh
run-testsuite, it doesn't seem to run the testcases
for jboss.net
I am not sure where I need to uncomment out in the
main
Hi Anil,
Sorry for not answering earlier. Needed to do some in-house priority 1
support.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Anil Saldhana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juni 2003 06:49
An: christoph
Betreff: UDDI Related
Dr.CGJ,
here are some new factoids after
Should all updates (bugfix/feature) for a branch also be applied to HEAD ? There are some updates that have only been applied to Branch_3_2, although they don't seem to be specific only for that Branch. According to my ( not very sophisticated... ) understanding of JBoss branch policy these
Hi Ulf,
People use different strategies.
Some apply fixes at the same time,
others apply them in bulk.
I tend to mix the two, keeping
the diffs of things I've not
applied to head.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
I think if the code, the fixes/features were applied to, is supposed to be
used in other branches, then these branches should be updated too.
alex
Friday, June 06, 2003, 2:25:21 PM, ulf schroeter wrote:
usmd Should all updates (bugfix/feature) for a branch also be applied to HEAD ?
usmd There
Ok, but just for info: is my assumption right, that updates to a branch without also applying them to HEAD will not show up in the following branch ?
Regards
Ulf
Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06.06.2003 13:39
Bitte antworten an jboss-development
Yes,
It means applying the patch to more branches.
The next branch from head probably won't be
until the end of this year.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I'm looking for cvs versioning and branching information. The developer's
page includes this:
For our policies on CVS versioning and branching see the CVS Administration
Guide.
but the link is broken. Attempts to follow it yield 'not found'.
Rod Burgett
Senior Software Engineer
from projects, developers links, guides, there's a 'cvs administration' link
that seems to point to the page you list.
but from projects, developers links, source code, there's a 'cvs
administration guide' link that goes nowhere:
GET STARTED WORKING FROM HOME TODAY!
This message contains valuable information about our
organization and qualified specialists who have
extensive knowledge and experience in WORKING
FROM HOME.
We have spent the last decade researching home employment options
available to the public. After
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
[junit] Running
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1337
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
[junit] at
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 921
Which page are you looking at?
Here is the information you want.
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=htmlop=userdisplayid=developers
/guides/cvs-admin
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
The Title still says 3.0, but the O'Reilly 3.2 companion workbook for
O'Reilly 3rd edition. Look for more stuff with O'Reilly in the future.
Best regards,
Sacha and Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView,
Hi,
When deploying one of our applications for our
clients, we needed an installer for JBoss on
the windows platform so we developed one. This
installer is now available (without the application
itself) for everyone to enjoy. It basically installs
JBoss 3.0.7 with an optional JRE and starts JBoss
Whoops, it would be nice if I gave the actuall URL. 3.2 Workbook is free
BTW.
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/entjbeans3/workbooks/index.html
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:59 PM
To:
In case others would like something similar on Linux, the Community Edition
of Out-of-the-Box works on both Windows and Linux. It optionally installs
JDK 1.4.1_02, JBoss 3.2.0, MySQL 4.0.12, Ant 1.5.3, JUnit, and a bunch of
other projects. It starts both JBoss and MySQL as a service on either
32 matches
Mail list logo
