Re: [JBoss-dev] Handling of ejb-ref and ejb-local-ref

2003-07-12 Thread Jan Bartel
Scott, Ok, your access is restored. Thanks. Please make sure there are tests added to the following unit tests to cover these changes: testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/naming/test/EjbLinkUnitTestCase.java testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/web/servlets/ENCServlet.java testsuite/src/main/org/jb

Re: c/s JBossMQ status, was: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ rewrite

2003-07-12 Thread Scott M Stark
Commit it on a branch. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Hiram Chirino wrote: The change is too big for a patch. I'd rather commit on a branch. Another option is to refactor it some more so that it becomes part of the new

Re: [JBoss-dev] multiple deployment info entries for invoker.war

2003-07-12 Thread Scott M Stark
David Jencks wrote: I don't know what you mean. Can you give a specific example? The example Rod gave of an ejb.jar deployment being stopped by shutting down the ejb container is an example. Again, I don't have any idea what you mean and an example would be very helpful. Personally, I think tha

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp) Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully

2003-07-12 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully

2003-07-12 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Test Results: 95 % ( 785 / 818 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-07-12 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp) Test Results: 96 % ( 787 / 818 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-07-12 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === ===