[JBoss-dev] JBossDO

2003-07-18 Thread Steve Lewis
I'd like to get involved with the JBossDO project. I've asked a few questions in the persistence forum but no one has answered. I know you guys are busy :), but I'd like to work on table generation, since no one seems to be working on it right now. I'd like to see how it's currently being done b

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Test Results: 95 % ( 786 / 820 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-07-18 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully

2003-07-18 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp) Test Results: 96 % ( 792 / 823 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-07-18 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp) Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully

2003-07-18 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === ===

[JBoss-dev] PARCELAS PUNTA DE CHOROS O $2.000.000 SOLO JULIO Consulte Facilidades

2003-07-18 Thread Tu Tierra
Title: Punta de ChorosParcelas 5075 M2 Solo $2.000.000 Consulte facilidades OFERTA DE INVIERNO PARCELAS PUNTA DE CHOROS

RE: [JBoss-dev] passivation in finalize

2003-07-18 Thread Bill Burke
I do call System.gc() but not in a separate thread, and not every second. That just defeats the purpose. Bill > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Anatoly Akkerman > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 3:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re

Re: [JBoss-dev] passivation in finalize

2003-07-18 Thread Anatoly Akkerman
Bill Burke wrote: I tried phantom references, but they were never enqueued. See attached. Bill Run a separate thread that calls System.gc() repeatedly every second. -- - Anatoly Akkerman Computer Science Dept. Courant Insti

RE: [JBoss-dev] passivation in finalize

2003-07-18 Thread Bill Burke
I tried phantom references, but they were never enqueued. See attached. Bill > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Anatoly Akkerman > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] passivation in fin

Re: [JBoss-dev] passivation in finalize

2003-07-18 Thread Anatoly Akkerman
Another useful link: http://www.artima.com/designtechniques/cleanupP.html The author does not recommend using a design that relies on timely invocation of finalizers. It seems PhantomReferences are not better, since an object becomes phantom reachable after finalization, so phantom reference is

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-773839 ] Exception handling in JCA adapter

2003-07-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #773839, was opened at 2003-07-18 20:26 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=773839&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None P

Re: [JBoss-dev] passivation in finalize

2003-07-18 Thread Anatoly Akkerman
Bill Burke wrote: I did. ReferenceQueue only places the Reference objects in queue. The object itself has already been garbage collected. Bill Quote from the link Julien submitted: Phantomly Reachable An object is phantomly reachable when the garbage collector finds no strong, soft, or weak re

RE: [JBoss-dev] passivation in finalize

2003-07-18 Thread Bill Burke
I did. ReferenceQueue only places the Reference objects in queue. The object itself has already been garbage collected. Bill > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > julien viet > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [JBoss-dev] passivation in finalize

2003-07-18 Thread julien viet
Have a look at the ReferenceQueue object : A java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue is a simple data structure onto which the garbage collector places reference objects when the reference field is cleared (set to null). You would use a reference queue to find out when an object becomes softly, weakly, or p

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-742197 ] getEJBLocalObject() bug

2003-07-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #742197, was opened at 2003-05-23 18:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by scoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=742197&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Subm

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-773074 ] Non spec compliant behavior of matchManagedConnections

2003-07-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #773074, was opened at 2003-07-17 15:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by d_jencks You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=773074&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 S

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-773658 ] typo in error message, JMSDestinationManager.java

2003-07-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #773658, was opened at 2003-07-18 13:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=773658&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-773074 ] Non spec compliant behavior of matchManagedConnections

2003-07-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #773074, was opened at 2003-07-17 17:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by janssk1 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=773074&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Su