Feature Requests item #774801, was opened at 2003-07-21 04:11
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=774801&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Re
Steve,
I've been preparing an email directly for Alex for several days now, but
since you're interested in the subject, I decided to reply on the list.
Hopefully this would spur a good discussion.
I recently exchanged several emails with Alex about JBossDO contributions
and I have on my plate to
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
Bugs item #774124, was opened at 2003-07-19 10:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=774124&group_id=22866
>Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
Bugs item #773839, was opened at 2003-07-18 18:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=773839&group_id=22866
>Category: JBossCX
Group: None
Status: Open
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priori
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
Bugs item #742197, was opened at 2003-05-23 01:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=742197&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority
Bugs item #769139, was opened at 2003-07-10 07:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=769139&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
P
Wow, people are actually looking at the code!
I must admit that currently, the MessageStore is somewhat nebulous in my
mind. The idea of course is to delegate all message storage to
implementations of MessageStore allowing them to store messages as they
see fit (in memory, database, file, etc.) n
For interested parties, read this thread:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=4&thread=315094
There are several schemes that implement pooling via tricks with
references.
Anatoly.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With V
Bill Burke wrote:
I do call System.gc() but not in a separate thread, and not every second.
That just defeats the purpose.
Bill
Perhaps, you already realized it, but it seems to me that using
references will not let you implement a ctx pool. I've modified your
test program to trigger gc in a sep
Hello Steve,
very nice to meet you! In fact, no one is working on schema generation
for JBossDO and new persistence engine at the moment.
Saturday, July 19, 2003, 8:31:51 AM, Steve Lewis wrote:
SL> I'd like to get involved with the JBossDO project.
SL> I've asked a few questions in the persiste
Hi,
I am currently looking at the MessageStore part of the new JMS
implementation. I would like to propose the addition of the following
method to MessageStore interface:
"Iterator getSavedMessagesIterator()"
The reason being that the MessageStore implementation may not want to
store all of th
15 matches
Mail list logo
