The serialization contract as dictated by the serialVersionID at which the class
was fixed in 3.2 should be maintained.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Bill Burke wrote:
I'd rather not maintain something like that. What
Bugs item #804968, was opened at 2003-09-12 11:55
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804968group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Could someone, please, check this testcase against current Branch_3_2?
It fails for me with timeout. I wonder whether I broke it in my local copy.
Thanks,
alex
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
The 20% was for Local interfaces and it doesn't break compatibility.
Sacha Labourey wrote:
I agree, compatibility has already been broken between minor 3.2.x versions,
so if it allows us to have 20% improvement, I would say: GO! The thinking
about compatibility should occur before, not after and
Bugs item #804968, was opened at 2003-09-12 12:55
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804968group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Bugs item #804491, was opened at 2003-09-11 16:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by slaboure
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804491group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #805136, was opened at 2003-09-12 18:04
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=805136group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Hi All,
Just a little status blurb.. POP3 support has begun in the jboss-mail
module (Mail Services for JBoss). SMTP is coming along well. Eric
Daugherty of JES fame has been given readwrite access and has already
implemented some bits and pieces of POP support as well as factored out
things
Why are connection listeners for ManagedConnections stored in a shared
hashmap within BaseConnectionmanager2?
BaseConnectionManager2.getConnectionEventListener(ManagedConnection mc)
Why can't the connection listener be stored in the Managed Connection?
I'd like to remove this contention.
Bugs item #804485, was opened at 2003-09-11 16:50
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804485group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
There is no such compatibility anyway. Or you simply do an Invocation2 and
have the server accept both but this will create legacy code that is not
very useful.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: vendredi, 12.
I agree, compatibility has already been broken between minor 3.2.x versions,
so if it allows us to have 20% improvement, I would say: GO! The thinking
about compatibility should occur before, not after and requires the
establishment of more serious and stable rules (version_id, etc.)s
Just one word...
Why can't the connection listener be stored in the Managed
Connection?
I'd like to remove this contention. OptimizeIt has this at
32.9% in my
little test on a dual CPU machine with 10 threads in contention.
Wow
Marcf
Bugs item #804667, was opened at 2003-09-11 22:31
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804667group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #804491, was opened at 2003-09-11 14:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bcotton969
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804491group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
So someone reminded me that in europe people don't like to take time off
their hollidays or weekends to go to a training. How could I forget?
Silly me. So we moved the dates for the amsterdam bootcamp from the
weekend Oct 11-12 to OCT 13-14. If you have already registered we will
be contacting
Bugs item #804491, was opened at 2003-09-11 14:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bcotton969
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804491group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Sorry, my bad
Adrian Brock wrote:
Fixed, it now uses org.jboss.util.NestedRuntimeException
Regards,
Adrian
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 16:26, Rod Burgett wrote:
I'm trying to compile the 3.2 snapshot with Sun's 1.3.1_07 jdk. It seems
that org.jboss.tm.TxUtils.java is trying to use a
Bugs item #804491, was opened at 2003-09-11 16:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by slaboure
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804491group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
21 matches
Mail list logo
