[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) Test Results: 95 % ( 1375 / 1446 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-11-06 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) Test Results: 65 % ( 676 / 1033 ) - could do better

2003-11-06 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Test Results: 94 % ( 1345 / 1418 ) - come on - pull your finger out

2003-11-06 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) Test Results: 94 % ( 1344 / 1418 ) - come on - pull your finger out

2003-11-06 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

Re: Joe Admin User && mail services Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA & JBoss

2003-11-06 Thread Adrian Brock
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 00:19, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > > > Why don't we start different threads for different issues? > > This thread start out as discussing making management easier. > > > > e.g. Joe Windows Admin wants a GUI Wizard entitled > > "Configure datasource" preferably one that does

Joe Admin User && mail services Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA & JBoss

2003-11-06 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
> > Why don't we start different threads for different issues? > This thread start out as discussing making management easier. > > e.g. Joe Windows Admin wants a GUI Wizard entitled > "Configure datasource" preferably one that does not ask if he writing > letter :-) > How does Joe hates-GUIs prog

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-837593 ] Classloading Exception after redeploy

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #837593, was opened at 2003-11-07 00:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=837593&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submit

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-11-06 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) Testsuite Compilation failed

2003-11-06 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-837593 ] Classloading Exception after redeploy

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #837593, was opened at 2003-11-07 00:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=837593&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None P

Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-06 Thread jboss user
Yes I would mind. People are using this so its not an optional service in the all configuration. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bernd Koecke [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-06 Thread Francisco Reverbel
When will you get 3.2.3.RC1 from CVS? There has been a JacORB bug fix (for Arjuna) that is not in our CVS yet. I´d generate a patched version of jacorb.jar with the fix. Cheers, Francisco On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Scott M Stark wrote: > I'm putting together a 3.2.3RC1 release to pickup some recent

[JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-group] JBoss mail status

2003-11-06 Thread Andrew Oliver
Thanks. Had intended to CC that too but I missed. -Andy On 11/5/03 11:33 AM, "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moved to jboss-dev list. > > Andrew Oliver wrote: > >> The present status is that the SMTP is mostly done and can post messages to >> JMS (that¹s just because I wrote that pa

[JBoss-dev] PARTNERSHIP REQUEST

2003-11-06 Thread GANI ALABI
Union Bank Plc Nigeria I am the Manager Bill and Exchange of the Foreign Operations Department Union Bank Plc Lagos Nigeria. I am writing in respect of a foreign customer of my bank with account number: 142552004/wb/t who died in November 1997 in a plane crash. Since we got the information

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-837305 ] NoInitialContextException after x redeployments

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #837305, was opened at 2003-11-06 16:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=837305&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: GET_DIGEST_STABLE is required?!?

2003-11-06 Thread Felipe Oliveira
hi bela, which default.xml? i am not sure how to get to work using tcp. could you give me more details please? this is my partitionconfig: up_thread="false" down_thread="false" /> port_range="1" timeout="15000" up_thread="false" down_thre

AW: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-06 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Bernd Koecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. November 2003 09:43 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1 > > > Hi, > > Christoph Jung made a bugfix for the redeploy bug of > webservices. But he made it for JBos

RE: [JBoss-dev] cmp with multiple datasource

2003-11-06 Thread hernan . terzian
I could do it work via jmx-console, but I cannot find the way to do it in my program. I'm doing: DataSourceDelegator dsd = new DataSourceDelegator(); try{ dsd.create(); dsd.setBindName("java:/DS1");

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-652411 ] Classloader sharing with MANIFEST

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #652411, was opened at 2002-12-12 01:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652411&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-669145 ] Error autocreating EJB-Tables

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669145, was opened at 2003-01-16 17:27 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by letiemble You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=669145&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-828093 ] Problems registering interceptors with JacORB inside JBoss

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #828093, was opened at 2003-10-22 09:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by reverbel You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=828093&group_id=22866 Category: JBossIIOP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priorit

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-837157 ] Performance findByPrimaryKey & commit B

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #837157, was opened at 2003-11-06 14:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=837157&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-829741 ] JNP Does not support multiple network cards

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #829741, was opened at 2003-10-24 19:44 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by letiemble You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=829741&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Remind

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-837092 ] CMP Field Update Optimization is Broken

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #837092, was opened at 2003-11-06 10:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by adrianprice You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=837092&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-828093 ] Problems registering interceptors with JacORB inside JBoss

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #828093, was opened at 2003-10-22 09:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rabegg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=828093&group_id=22866 Category: JBossIIOP Group: v3.2 >Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-837092 ] CMP Field Update Optimization is Broken

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #837092, was opened at 2003-11-06 10:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=837092&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: No

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-837042 ] "run.sh -b " doesn't work

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #837042, was opened at 2003-11-06 08:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmontag You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=837042&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priori

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-06 Thread Bernd Koecke
Hi, Christoph Jung made a bugfix for the redeploy bug of webservices. But he made it for JBoss 4. Will it be also present in 3.2.3RC1? Bernd Scott M Stark wrote: > I'm putting together a 3.2.3RC1 release to pickup some recent bug fixes. > I'm > working on a fix for [ 832561 ] NoSuchMethodExcepti

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-837042 ] "run.sh -b " doesn't work

2003-11-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #837042, was opened at 2003-11-06 08:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=837042&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

AW: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-06 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
There were two fixes related to axis classloading and discovery that need to be backported. What is your timeframe? I could submit the stuff on Friday. CU, CGJ > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. November 2003 16:24 > An: