It would be nice to be configurable as well.
I.E.
Apache Coyote/1.0 JBoss/3.2.3 OEM/ISV/1.0
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "SourceForge.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:31 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-858049 ]
Feature Requests item #858049, was opened at 2003-12-11 04:31
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=858049&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolu
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
At 03:31 PM 12/10/2003 +0100, Rémy wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Given HEAD needs to support the new Servlet & JSP specifications, I plan to:
>- remove support fot Tomcat 4.1.x
>- port all the changes I've made in 3.2 (which integrates TC 5.0.16) to HEAD
>
>Any issues with this ?
Rémy,
I have a small patch I pl
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
dearborn indium confrontation sail stamen religion usurpation empire chomp chance envelope yaounde fayetteville compression dora smirk malaise tamp bartender hap initiate ani condensible universal barnyard componentry
Banned CD Government don't want me to sell it. See Now $
antwerp mire poly
yes you are right, there are minor bugs to fix and that needs redeploy from
time to time.
julien
> Bill Burke wrote:
>> ? worked for me.
>>
>> Sebastian Hauer wrote:
>>
>>> I was just going to post into the test forum and got a
>>> -
>>> HTTP Status 500 - No Context configured to p
Feature Requests item #857874, was opened at 2003-12-10 22:41
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=857874&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Re
Bugs item #856982, was opened at 2003-12-09 18:51
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=856982&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Pr
Bill Burke wrote:
? worked for me.
Sebastian Hauer wrote:
I was just going to post into the test forum and got a
-
HTTP Status 500 - No Context configured to process this request type
Status report
message No Context configured to process this request
description The server encounter
? worked for me.
Sebastian Hauer wrote:
I was just going to post into the test forum and got a
-
HTTP Status 500 - No Context configured to process this request
type Status report
message No Context configured to process this request
description The server encountered an internal er
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I was just going to post into the test forum and got a
-
HTTP Status 500 - No Context configured to process this request
type Status report
message No Context configured to process this request
description The server encountered an internal error (No Context
configured to process thi
Can you all bang on it? Julien did a bunch of testing before hand and
it seems to be working pretty good so far.
Kudos to Julien's hard work. It looks pretty nice and is pretty fast.
Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tu
Nice job tom,
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tom Elrod
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] One way invocations in remoting added
>
> I have added the ability to do
Bugs item #857589, was opened at 2003-12-10 15:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejain
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=857589&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Bugs item #857589, was opened at 2003-12-10 14:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=857589&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority:
No, but we need to get tc5 passing the WebIntegrationUnitTestCase,
which currently it does not.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Given HEAD needs to support the new Servlet & JSP specifications, I
Hi,
Given HEAD needs to support the new Servlet & JSP specifications, I plan to:
- remove support fot Tomcat 4.1.x
- port all the changes I've made in 3.2 (which integrates TC 5.0.16) to HEAD
Any issues with this ?
--
x
Re'my Maucherat
Senior Developer & Consultant
JBo
Bugs item #857589, was opened at 2003-12-10 15:19
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=857589&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Non
Please, ask it on jboss-user mailing list providing the generated SQL
query and stacktraces.
netanel weinberg wrote:
Hello!
i have a web application i built using EJB and i'm trying to make an ejb-ql
according to two parameters:
findByCompanycode
21 matches
Mail list logo
