[JBoss-dev] Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully (or we gave up on it...)! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: % ( / ) - . JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

Re: [JBoss-dev] client-deployer-xmbean.xml problem in 3.2

2003-12-28 Thread Juha Lindfors
They add the default attributes and operations to integrate with JBoss's service lifecycle, Heiko recently renamed them to defaultAttributes and defaultOperations, try changing the entity names, and make sure you're working with the latest CVS checkout. -- Juha On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Tom Elrod

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: % ( / ) - . JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Shutdown Failed! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully (or we gave up on it...)! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-808170 ] Partition problems 3.2.2RC4

2003-12-28 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #808170, was opened at 2003-09-17 23:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gabramovic You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=808170group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed

RE: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.test.cache.test.generic.PropertyConfiguratorUnitTestCase problem

2003-12-28 Thread Scott M Stark
No, this is in 3.2. Run it by running the full testsuite: cd jboss-3.2/testsuite ./build.sh tests How are you running this? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Wang Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 9:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-dev] client-deployer-xmbean.xml problem in 3.2

2003-12-28 Thread Scott M Stark
The client-deployer is not part of the jmx1.2 stuff and already runs in the 3.2 branch using the client-deployer-service.xml so what is the source of the client-deployer-xmbean.xml? Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS problem

2003-12-28 Thread Francisco Reverbel
Thanks! Francisco On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Scott M Stark wrote: The thirdparty directory is just a collection of other alias checkouts. You already had avalon checked into the thirdparty/apache/avalon dir in 3.2, so checkout thirdparty/apache/avalon on head and add the libs. I have done this

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

Re: [JBoss-dev] client-deployer-xmbean.xml problem in 3.2

2003-12-28 Thread Tom Elrod
The root of the problem is that the new XMBean constructor takes an dom4j Element instead of w3c Element (due to new XMLMetaData class). Instead of changing a lot of code else where, I just updated the XMBean to accept both w3c and dom4j Elements in 2 different constructor signatures. Seems to

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 95 % ( 1480 / 1553 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1447 / 1524 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 95 % ( 1477 / 1552 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-12-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===