===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #877974, was opened at 2004-01-15 18:57
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=877974&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
On Jan 15, 2004, at 15:13, Andrew Oliver wrote:
So I do a lot of JBoss training and when I'm not doing that I'm
working on
making JBoss a kick-ass email server so that no one ever has to use
exchange
or domino again. I often wonder what the quiet folks are doing that
is cool
with JBoss.
So if
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Oliver
>
> So I do a lot of JBoss training and when I'm not doing that
> I'm working on
> making JBoss a kick-ass email server so that no one ever has
> to use exchange
> or domino again. I often wonder what the quiet folks are
> doing that is
You mean SMD, right?
LOL :)
s-dev] Fwd: ASF JIRA Installation is available
>
> suck me
>
> Andrew Oliver wrote:
> > Maybe someone can write a bug tracker module for nukes }:-)>
> >
> > -Andy
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCo
To paraphrase Danch:
"you _are_ joking, right?"
> On Behalf Of Bill Burke:
> suck me
>
> Andrew Oliver wrote:
> > Maybe someone can write a bug tracker module for nukes }:-)>
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
P
and it kicks ass
On Jan 15, 2004, at 11:04 PM, Adrian Brock wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 21:04, Andrew Oliver wrote:
If we forego unnecessary features from the bug tracker such as:
Fields (really just a nicety)
Search/filter on fields (nice to have but who needs it)
History (Nice to have bu
So I do a lot of JBoss training and when I'm not doing that I'm working on
making JBoss a kick-ass email server so that no one ever has to use exchange
or domino again. I often wonder what the quiet folks are doing that is cool
with JBoss.
So if you don't have a jboss.org/.com address or even if
Yes... It was kind of an inside joke.
> From: danch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:25:48 -0600
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: ASF JIRA Installation is available
>
> you _are_ joking, right?
>
> Andrew Oliver wrote:
>> If we
Hi Adrian,
I've posted my fix/reimplementation to ManagementBean and affected
classes. Thanks for your time and help in this process.
Best,
-Charlton.
On Jan 14, 2004, at 12:03, Charlton Barreto wrote:
Hi Adrian,
On Jan 14, 2004, at 11:42, Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi Charlton,
In anycase the i
Danch is still alive, amazing,
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of danch
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 5:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: ASF JIRA Installation is available
>
> you _are_ jok
Patches item #877858, was opened at 2004-01-15 22:33
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=877858&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resoluti
you _are_ joking, right?
Andrew Oliver wrote:
If we forego unnecessary features from the bug tracker such as:
Fields (really just a nicety)
Search/filter on fields (nice to have but who needs it)
History (Nice to have but you only need to know that there is a bug)
Change notification for bugs (no
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 21:04, Andrew Oliver wrote:
> If we forego unnecessary features from the bug tracker such as:
>
> Fields (really just a nicety)
> Search/filter on fields (nice to have but who needs it)
> History (Nice to have but you only need to know that there is a bug)
> Change notificati
If we forego unnecessary features from the bug tracker such as:
Fields (really just a nicety)
Search/filter on fields (nice to have but who needs it)
History (Nice to have but you only need to know that there is a bug)
Change notification for bugs (not really needed)
We can then just use the nuke
Actually, that's a great idea. We'll write a bug tracker for nukes for
6 months, but then decide to replace it with Jira because somebody wants
Wiki style bug text.
Bill
Andrew Oliver wrote:
Maybe someone can write a bug tracker module for nukes }:-)>
-Andy
From: Bill Burke <[EMAIL PROTEC
suck me
Andrew Oliver wrote:
Maybe someone can write a bug tracker module for nukes }:-)>
-Andy
From: Bill Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:18:40 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: ASF JIRA Installation is available
The othe
Maybe someone can write a bug tracker module for nukes }:-)>
-Andy
> From: Bill Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:18:40 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: ASF JIRA Installation is available
>
> The other problem is mov
Hi Heiko !
this is configurable, you can enable guest to write or not
On Jan 15, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Rupp, Heiko wrote:
Salut Julien,
Yes there is a bug which prevents anonymous users to post,
I will fix it.
I am not sure, that/if this is a good idea.
Heiko
---
Bugs item #844654, was opened at 2003-11-18 20:06
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cazzius
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=844654&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priori
Bugs item #844654, was opened at 2003-11-18 20:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cazzius
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=844654&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Su
Salut Julien,
> Yes there is a bug which prevents anonymous users to post,
> I will fix it.
I am not sure, that/if this is a good idea.
Heiko
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Developme
Bugs item #858089, was opened at 2003-12-10 23:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=858089&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Works For Me
Prior
Bugs item #860175, was opened at 2003-12-14 22:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=860175&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
>Resolution: Remind
Priority: 5
Bugs item #874152, was opened at 2004-01-09 14:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=874152&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
P
Bugs item #870942, was opened at 2004-01-05 06:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=870942&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Su
Bugs item #877172, was opened at 2004-01-14 13:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=877172&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Su
We can try tc5 as the default in the next 3.2 rc release.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remy Maucherat
Sent: Wednesday, January 14,
Patches item #877497, was opened at 2004-01-15 11:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=877497&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Non
My first comment is that in eg, a stateful session bean, the
model of one transaction per session is too restrictive.
However, stateless session beans are, i admit, a more common
case.
Regarding the JCA connector, I must admit I have had very
little to do with it, it is Daniel Bradby's work.
What d
Patches item #877425, was opened at 2004-01-15 09:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=877425&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Non
Patches item #877413, was opened at 2004-01-15 08:53
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=877413&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Non
Let me have a look!
/Dimitris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: ÎÎÏÎÏÏÎ, 14 ÏÎÏÎÎÏ 2004 9:15 ÎÎ
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] snmp-adaptor ported from Branch_3.2 to HEAD
Hey, do you want to work on plugg
34 matches
Mail list logo
