[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: % ( / ) - . JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-04-06 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Wildcards in FQNs

2004-04-06 Thread spiritualmechanic
I think I could probably use this feature as well. A collection would be great. This would be similar to searching in LDAP (let's say for scope = SUB, filter of objectclass=*, with base DN of /foo Maybe this kind of stuff is outside the scope of JBossCache. I'm not sure. Steve View the origina

[JBoss-dev] Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully (or we gave up on it...)! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-04-06 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - TreeCache

2004-04-06 Thread spiritualmechanic
Hey, this looks really great. If I get a chance, I want to dump our entire LDAP tree into TreeCache and modify our LDAP beans to hit JBossCache instead. I think it'd be a cinch to recursively read it in on startup. I was looking for some sort of caching solution and this seems to be perfect. Ste

[JBoss-dev] [JMS on JBoss (JMS/JBoss)] - Re: Thread naming

2004-04-06 Thread richieb
Done. See patch number: 930783 Here is what the thread dump will look like: | Thread: UILServerILService Accept Thread : priority:5, demon:false | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.ReadTask#1 [127.0.0.1:32920] : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#2 [127.0.0.1:32920] : p

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-930783 ] Show IP address in thread name for UIL2

2004-04-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #930783, was opened at 2004-04-06 20:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=930783&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1594 / 1682 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-04-06 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: TODO: Bounce Messages

2004-04-06 Thread kabkhan
Oh yeah, It is a very simple version. It just contains the subject and a list of the recipients who failed. Kab View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829539#3829539 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=repl

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: TODO: Bounce Messages

2004-04-06 Thread kabkhan
I've commited it now. Some things I'm not sure if I'm too happy about: * I'm using a hardcoded ObjectName for the MailListener MBean in Remote- and LocalDeliveryMessageBean. (Some messages might need to be bounced back to a local user, others to a remote one). I did not bother to add a depends

[JBoss-dev] [JMS on JBoss (JMS/JBoss)] - Re: Thread naming

2004-04-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. Please provide a patch against cvs co ... -r Branch_3_2 jboss-3.2 To generate the patch use cvs diff -U 5 > patch.txt and post it at www.sf.net/projects/jboss If you have some other good ideas I can get you CVS R/W so you can apply them yourself. Regards, Adrian View the original post : h

[JBoss-dev] [JMS on JBoss (JMS/JBoss)] - Thread naming

2004-04-06 Thread richieb
Would it make sense to include the IP address in threads that connect to clients on other machines. For example the UIL2 WriterTask and ReaderTask. This would make debugging of problems a lot easier in case of stuck/problematic clients. ...richie View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: Integration- bringing source code

2004-04-06 Thread acoliver
Excellent. Also pay attention to source organization. If we need more directories in order to keep the build.xml simple then thats fine. maybe src/java/org/jboss/mail/calendar and src/web/org etc. The project development accelerated significantly once I had people to fight with :-) Vie

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: Integration- bringing source code

2004-04-06 Thread a_sogor
Life is all about compromises:) And as long you view conflict as an opportunity verus a treat we will be fine. I pack up the hibernate beans as one jar. The ejb as another. I give you that one first. Then pack Webui as a war and make it conditional to include it in the ear. Or figure out to ma

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Is the plan to move to portlets?

2004-04-06 Thread joehobson
I just wanted to voice my support of the JSR 168 portlet spec being implimented in Nukes. I really like Nukes- the developers, the code, the philosophy et al. At the same time I'm looking at building a portlet so that it doesn't matter which portal my clients want to use- uPortal, Sakai, Oracle,

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: Integration- bringing source code

2004-04-06 Thread acoliver
BTW argument and conflict are good. It makes each person think things through. I understand things WAY better than I did when I asked what the protocols were and stuff :-). People defend their arguments better than they explain things. So I tell all contributors to mail services to fight wit

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: Integration- bringing source code

2004-04-06 Thread acoliver
Okay, the ICal stuff should be seperate from the mail stuff in teh build. Meaning I should be able to deploy mail without iCal support. JBoss doesn't always have Tomcat enabled. Its more mainstream to not use the webcontainer than you think. Just stick support in your build changes for NOT

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: MailLog considered harmful and other bugfixes

2004-04-06 Thread acoliver
the log4j sniplet I posted didn't come through all the way. I'll repost it on the wiki when I write the docs for mail services M1. This week I'm mostly testing, fixing bugs and writing docs (aka the dirty work). I'm counting on you guys to nail the few final issues. View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - MailLog considered harmful and other bugfixes

2004-04-06 Thread acoliver
In the process of tracking down a bug I ran into the nasty mail log thing again. It was a dumb idea when I implemented it. Or rather it was a good idea with HORRIBLE tradeoffs. I wanted to be able to turn on and off conversational logging from the JMX Console or some similar tool. The nasty

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - TreeCacheAOP transacctional add, remove for Collection

2004-04-06 Thread arojo
Hello, I'm trying to execute concurrent add,remove over a Collection for a TreeAOPCache with multiple members. I'm finding some problems that leave the Caches at inconsistent state. I've created a version of testConcurrentPut() method fot TreeAOPCache to be executed at: org.jboss.test.cache.t

[JBoss-dev] [Clusters on JBoss (Clusters/JBoss)] - Warning : Deployed as CLUSTERED but not a single cluster

2004-04-06 Thread ftftft
I am using JBoss3.2.3 when i try to deploy CMP entity bean in cluster mode jboss gives warning 'Deployed as CLUSTERED but not a single clustered-invoker is bound to container ' during deployment of all my entity beans. here is the jboss.xml config for my entity bean: Country local/Country Tr

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: Integration- bringing source code

2004-04-06 Thread a_sogor
I get your sentiment, for no web ui but it will be troublesome. It can be done, the Struts UI is one war of it's own, not including in the ear is simple. But once web ui is out there is nothing left(YET) to interact with so adding, updating, deleting calendar entries are would be out. All the

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: TODO: Bounce Messages

2004-04-06 Thread kabkhan
Almost there, my computer died a slow horrible death at the end of last week, so I have been busy configuring a new one. (Building the entire 3.2.4RC1 now takes 3 minutes rather than 28 :-D ) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829480#3829480 Re

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Searching for talent

2004-04-06 Thread oz59
aop related post at http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=46997. thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829478#3829478 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3829478

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Offline Installation

2004-04-06 Thread oz59
Greetings. Save the IDE's feature and plugins on the stick too. Don't forget the org.apache.xalan plugin. Install on your home machine into respective directories and it should work w/ restart. cheers. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829477

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: Integration- bringing source code

2004-04-06 Thread acoliver
My main request is to keep the struts/web gui admin stuff seperate such that it doesn't HAVE to be installed. I'm curious if the JBoss simple HTTP classloader server thingy could be used instead of tomcat where needed for the calendar protocol. Mainly with the idea that sometimes you just want

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: MVC for Nukes

2004-04-06 Thread jae77
is there anything pressing that needs to be addressed? i wouldn't mind a small "break" from the news module... and speaking of which, it is coming along nicely (slowly, but nicely) - i've pulled out about 60% of the html into templates and now i'm working on adding a small "framework" so we can

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: MVC for Nukes

2004-04-06 Thread cooper
I share the same idea, but it can wait a little. I want to fix bugs (the search bugs you cited and some others) in addition I am not ready to commit something right now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829459#3829459 Reply to the post : http:

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: MVC for Nukes

2004-04-06 Thread sgwood
I'd be interested to see where you are at. Julien, with the portlet piece being your focus now, should we tag a version 1.1 and get that out? Sherman View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829456#3829456 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/i

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Offline Installation

2004-04-06 Thread Hustenbolschen
Hello, i already use Eclipse 2.1.3 and downloaded newest JBoss 3.x Version. I want to use JBoss IDE integrated in Eclipse at work and at home...and now the question: At home I don`t have any possibility to connect to the internet. But I want to save my Eclipse-workspace on my USB-Stick and cont

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Problem running Tutorial ClusteredHTTPSessionService not

2004-04-06 Thread MarcoAntonioni
As from trace ... ... warUrl=file:/C:/jboss-3.0.5_tomcat-4.1.18/server/default/tmp/deploy/server/default/deploy/FiboApp.ear/22.FiboApp.ear-contents/FiboWeb.war You are running 'default' configuration that hasn't cluster capabilities; run the 'all' configuration. View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Is the plan to move to portlets?

2004-04-06 Thread cooper
Our portlet implementation will be the core of Nukes. Your help is considered as welcome. However we need to extend the portlet interfaces when it makes sense to provide more to the modules. For instance I like the getParameterAsXXX in the current Page object, so I want something like : public

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: MVC for Nukes

2004-04-06 Thread cooper
This is the approach advocated by portlets too, in each portlet you have two methods : | * action(ActionRequest req, ActionResponse resp) | * render(RenderRequest req, RenderResponse resp) | action(...) is first called and then render is called. this is where you can hook the controller

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Is the plan to move to portlets?

2004-04-06 Thread iKestrel
I understand there is the beginning of work on implementing the portlet spec (or at least talking about it). Once portlet support is added, is the plan to move all the modules/blocks to portlets? I understand there has been discussion about priorities, but I need to understand the vision and di

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - MVC for Nukes

2004-04-06 Thread sgwood
The current approach of putting all operation code in the module classes does not scale very well - BBModule is up to 256K of source now. Some of that can be fixed by refactoring, but we are still left with the module class needing all the operation methods on it. As I am developing my applicat

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSP update?

2004-04-06 Thread cooper
I tried but there are too many changes to bring. It will happen with the portlet stuff I am coding at the moment. I'll keep you informed View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829429#3829429 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=b

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - JSP update?

2004-04-06 Thread sgwood
Hi, Julian, You have made a few checkins in the JSPModule area. Can you give us an update on this? Is the JSP in a module WAR happening? Sherman View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829422#3829422 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Creating New User

2004-04-06 Thread sgwood
Nobody has asked about providing remote interfaces. You could easily change the build scripts to do so, and create an ejb-client.jar for each module. Sherman View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829419#3829419 Reply to the post : http://www.jbos

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: I18N bug

2004-04-06 Thread sgwood
I have put this fix into CVS. Sherman View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829418#3829418 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3829418 --- This

[JBoss-dev] Testsuite Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-04-06 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Testsuite Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-04-06 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: I18N bug

2004-04-06 Thread tiny
The updated class can be found here CoreModule.java. You can apply the following patch to the old version to fix the bug CoreModule.java.patch patch CoreModule.java < CoreModule.java.patch Hope someone with write access to CVS can fix the bug as soon as possible. View the original po

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: I18N bug

2004-04-06 Thread tiny
Sorry the proposed fix still has subtle bugs. What we really want is the following order of lookup resource bundles baseName+"_"+language1+"_"+country1+"_"+variant1 baseName+"_"+language1+"_"+country1 baseName+"_"+language1 baseName+"_"+language2+"_"+country2+"_"+variant2 baseName+"_"+language2+

[JBoss-dev] Testsuite Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-04-06 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Testsuite Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-04-06 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [Persistence development forum] - Re: How to automatically create a EJB when starting JBOSS?

2004-04-06 Thread antdavidl
You can create and deploy a mbean (or a servlet) that instantiate them when they were deployed. In this way, you force the creation of at least one EJB. Regards David Lopez View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829384#3829384 Reply to the post : ht

[JBoss-dev] [EJB on JBoss] - Re: How to automatically create a EJB when starting JBOSS?

2004-04-06 Thread antdavidl
You can create and deploy a mbean (or a servlet) that instantiate them when they were deployed. In this way, you force the creation of at least one EJB. Regards David Lopez View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829385#3829385 Reply to the post : ht

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-930271 ] RFE: moving individual responses

2004-04-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #930271, was opened at 2004-04-06 10:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=930271&group_id=22866 Category: Nukes Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: JBoss-IDE and Eclipse 3.0M8

2004-04-06 Thread letiemble
Hi, There is an almost daily snapshot of the codebase. See http://jboss.sourceforge.net/snapshots/. Laurent View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829382#3829382 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3