I think that in some cases, more than one selector might be necessary (that is be able
to specify multiple selectors and have some merge on the headers).
I can help if necessary but we need to coordinate.
Regards,
Stephane
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=
There is no well-defined format on the wire. We simply use externalization to marshal
our messages. Check out org.jgroups.Message for details.
Bela
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831150#3831150
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.h
Hi all,
Same here...
I got an error message "The currently displayed page contains invalid values" once I
got to the Template page.
Maik, did you got it resolved?
Regards
Nick
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831148#3831148
Reply to the post
that sounds like a good package name. When you upload the patch upload it to the wiki
as an attachment.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831146#3831146
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=38311
What might be nifty is if the container could attempt to pool a resource. If the
container finds that one or the other is significantly faster, it could upgrade it to
a JCA, or downgrade it to no-pooling.
1. Get 10 objects using pool
2. Create 10 objects w/o pool
3. Compare the times.
4. AOP as
Which package name should I use? Right now I have org.jboss.mail.jca. I'll wait until
you tell me before I even upload it to patch.
Steve
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831144#3831144
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modul
Don't commit to head until after I branch for the M1 release.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831142#3831142
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831142
---
1. Use async repl if you can
2. You may want to switch to a TCP-based config, if IP multicast is not supported
Bela
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831141#3831141
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=re
Do->Does. English. Grammar. Whatever.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831140#3831140
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831140
---
This SF
All of the examples use invocation.invokeNext(). It might be nice to see an example
that doesn't use it (i.e. the proxy you mentioned before).
Do one of the unit tests do that? I'm looking through the jbosstest AOP tests and none
of them jump out at me for a Proxy.
View the original post :
htt
Okay, I have the adapter deploying. I'm going to do some tests and then I'll upload it
as a patch after I feel comfortable with initial use.
After that, tests!
Steve
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831138#3831138
Reply to the post :
http://w
Let me know if the tutorial is complete enough and answers your questions well enough.
Thanks,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831137#3831137
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831137
Bill: "One of the aspects tests actually creates a proxy and returns that instead."
Is that in the AOP examples, or in jbosstest?
Bill: "You can also do call side constructor interception of you only want to use the
pool in certain code structures."
I think Adrian mentioned that as well, in the
Word, Andy. I hate it, too. I intend to only have to learn it once, then make it
generic, and then help other people. I can already think of multiple cases where we
could have used this at my workplace.
I want to make it very smart, as well, so that if someone sets up a connector, and
they use
I'm going to cut M1RC1 this weekend. I'll probably cut a branch for this so just be
advised. "MS_M1_BRANCH" or something.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831133#3831133
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting
I'm planning to change the default port to 25/110. 9000 and 9001 was just for while I
didn't want anyone to ACCIDENTLY set up an open relay while we worked out the kinks.
I'm confident that our defaults won't be an open relay at least by M1. I'm planning
to cut M1RC1 this weekend.
View the o
Just wanted to say this sounds like a pretty awesome idea. Anything that makes it so
that I never have to write a JCA adaptor sounds awesome to me.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831131#3831131
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I already created this topic for Observable improvements
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=48622
Obviously dynamically adding/removing the interceptor is preferrable based on whether
{add/remove}Observer is invoked. But I didn't want to overcomplicate the initial
implementat
Can you explain the annotation usage.
Is that doable now or do we have to code something?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831124#3831124
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831124
---
On call context propagation I would like to use something similar to
what Bill has done container interceptors based on metadata.
i.e. if you POJO has the transaction demarcation aspect then when
you construct the remote proxy, it includes the client side transaction interceptor
I'd also like to
Posted. Have a great weekend. But not *too* great.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831122#3831122
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831122
--
Patches item #936699, was opened at 2004-04-17 00:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=936699&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution:
Sorry, one more thing.
THis should be extended to do more fine grain obervations. Not only field changes,
but also method calls and such. Also, per field, per method, etc...
Also, it might make sense to not bind an interceptor at the class level, but rather
bind the interceptor on a per-insta
Hey, don't go killing too many brain cells there! You have a lot
to do on the next gen micrkernel :#)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 3:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBo
Also, you can use annotations within the introduction.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831120#3831120
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831120
--
It should also be triggerable by an annotation.
| http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831119#3831119
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831119
---
This SF.Net email
I used "Subject" because that is the term used by the GOF
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831118#3831118
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831118
---
Post it as a patch at www.sf.net/projects/jboss
I might get chance to look at it over the weekend, although it is a good friend's
birthday so I will probably me "non compus mentis" :-)
http://www.clickdocs.co.uk/glossary/non-compus-mentis.htm
Regards,
Adrian
View the original post :
http://www.
Ok, good. One step of abstraction above this is the notion of container mediated
services. So for example, in the case of my ModelMBean pojo wanting access to the
MBeanServer, if it only needs this to access a service representable by an interface,
it would be better if there was a dependency sp
Also, with regards to the real solution i.e. caller side analysis weaving, I think
that would be super-cool. The point of this is to make it as easy as possible for the
customer of JCA, which may make the container developer's life a little harder, but I
think it'd be worth it.
Steve
View the
So I am looking at the code,
1- well done Adrian this is kick ass stuff
2- Why do we call it the "Subject"? why don't you call it observable.
3- We need to start talking of aspects. I realize we apply the "observable" aspect
and introduce that behavior. That we introduce it on set is irreleva
Adrian,
I can send you my JCPool mbean if you want to look at the code, to see if I'm on the
right track, or if I'm missing any obvious features.
If you don't want to, or don't have time, or just have better things to do, that's
fine as well :D I'll send it on whenever I have the AOP part worki
You can take a pojo and expose it as a service using an XMBean, but it has no ability
to know what MBeanServer it is registered with, or access to its management metadata.
This change allows for an IOC type of setting of the container context such as the
MBeanServer by providing a setMBeanServer
Generically it is a callback interface like MBeanRegistration
for services that want to know about their container and their configuration
| public interface ContainerRegistration
| {
|void setContainer(Container container);
|void setMetaData(MetaData metaData);
| }
|
View t
Scott, can you expand a bit more on the value of your addition. I am not able to
follow.
Ivelin
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831108#3831108
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831108
-
http://jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=GOFObservable
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831107#3831107
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831107
---
I have added reflective setting of the MBeanServer and MBeanInfo for ModelMBean
resources that support the corresponding setters:
|public void setResource(Object resource)
|{
| this.resource = resource;
| /* Pass on the MBeanInfo and MBeanServer to pojo resources if t
In fact, it isn't that you "don't have to", "you don't want to".
invocation.invokeNext() will lead to the real constructor creating an Object instance
you don't want.
When you do want to invoke the real constructor, use reflection.
POJO.class.newInstance();
Regards,
Adrian
View the original pos
Okay, that makes sense. Righto. I'll see what I can do from that.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831100#3831100
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831100
---
No, you do not have to call invokeNext.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831101#3831101
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831101
---
This
Do I still need to call invocation.invokeNext(), or will I be missing executing some
constructor processing if I don't?
Like:
invokation.invokeNext();
o = Static.method();
return o;
Steve
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831099#3831099
Reply
The server.conf file is not loaded. You have to configure the use of a security
manager on the command line and then pass in the policy file location.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831098#3831098
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/inde
Simple transaction rollback was working with hypersonic, but seems not to be working
when we switched to mysql.
Running mysql-connector-java-3.0.11 and mysql 4.0.18-0 (client and server) with JBoss
3.2.3 java 1.4.2_04.
We have 2 stateless session beans FooService and BarService. FooService has
Got it. Thanks. In my original message I meant exactly that - unregister, not destroy.
So, as it turns out, all my 3 statements were valid, and all 3 are fixed.
Wow, I'm looking forward for this 3.2.4 release!
Thanks for the instant responses.
Yuri
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/
I know yours was Bill.
Steve is interested in it in the context of a global pool:
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=48594
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831092#3831092
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.htm
Why would you want to destroy the container if it is DESTROYED.
Your problem is with unregistering the container, look further down.
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/EjbModule.java?r1=1.53&r2=1.54
Regards,
Adrian
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.
right. my choice of 'ceau.com' was mainly motivated by not wanting to get in the way
of other tests which put up Server mbeans, for instance, that listen on port 9000 by
default --- so a fully running externally set-up localhost server on port 9000 would
tend to break the unit tests.
what about
The way you implement it is the similar, but:
cache.equals(pool) == false;
cache is a map of identity to objects having different state
pool is a set of equivalent objects
Regards,
Adrian
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831089#3831089
Reply t
Sweet. Thanks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831086#3831086
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831086
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
I take that back...Claude is helping with Asynch stuff, but I do need help in the core.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831084#3831084
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831084
---
Would be interesting, but it is not a priority right now.
I would be most greatful if you would take on the task. Right now, I'm just one guy
and there's too much to do.
BIll
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831083#3831083
Reply to the post :
The test I did WAS using ThreadLocal as the pool. Object creation was still faster.
Maybe Object creation has a mutex and a multithreaded test would make regular object
creation slower than ThreadLocal.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=38
Adrian,
regarding your
3) Was fixed in 3.2.4 RC1
I just checked out rc1 source code and EjbModule.java still contains the same
boolean destroyContainer = conState == CREATED || conState == STOPPED || conState ==
FAILED;
|
DESTROYED is still missing.
View the original post :
http://
Surely MultiThreaded would be worse (more contention)
unless your pooling uses a ThreadLocal pool
I removed all that crap from JBossMQ
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831080#3831080
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb
It looks like there's similar functionality already in JBoss-Cache, using AOP to
cachify a List or a Map. That's basically the first step in pooling. There may be a
difference in what JCA would want and what Cache already has. Not sure.
Looking into it some more.
Steve
View the original post :
Or if the Object is expensive to construct like a database connection.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831079#3831079
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831079
--
Yes, the constructor interceptor runs in the context of the calling code.
Uninstrumented code:
POJO pojo = new POJO();
Instrumented and intercepted - (pseudo code):
POJO pojo = POJO.staticMethodReplacingConstructor();
With a stacktrace similar to this:
POJO.PoolingInterceptor.invoke();
POJO.C
Thanks for the response.
I just realized that xml markup around tag depends in my email was eatten by html.
This may make my message confusing, so I paste these fragments again with html
disabled.
.war
- a servlet
- WEB-INF/jboss-web.xml with my.domain:id=xyz
2. The effect of the my.domain:id
sure. One of the aspects tests actually creates a proxy and returns that instead.
Constructor interception is an "around" thingy so you can return any instance you want
of the constructor.
You can also do call side constructor interception of you only want to use the pool in
certain code struc
This was a single threaded test. Maybe it is different in multithreaded test.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831074#3831074
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831074
---
Please do not cross post.
As a penance, provide a link in this post to the one where I answered your question.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831073#3831073
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p
Download the latest source from CVS (3.2.4RC2)
1) No longer exists
2) I don't follow this point can you restate it more clearly
3) Was fixed in 3.2.4RC1
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831071#3831071
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/in
Very interesting.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831070#3831070
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831070
---
This SF.Net email is sponso
I'd like to intercept a constructor such that I don't return the actual object, but an
instance of the same object type from a pool.
It looks like
Object o = invocation.invokeNext() will get me the object, so maybe what I want to do
is do:
Object o = Pool.getInstance();
Is that sane?
Steve
Bug fix:
Null the exception listener such that errors during the close don't invoke it
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831066#3831066
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831066
-
Example jms persistence using Sybase
Based on confiig provided by amresh.deshmukh at drkw.com
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831065#3831065
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831065
--
Yes, but only use maintain the hashtable/hashmap if there is an optimized-selector
and the receiver's selector matches the optimized selector.
Care to implement it?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831064#3831064
Reply to the post :
http://www.
I believe I found a bug in JBoss hot undeploy algorithm. Here is my setup:
- Jboss 3.2.3 running on Linux
- a single .ear archive
- this ear includes: .war archive, .sar archive, and .jar archive:
.sar
- Jboss service with mbean name "my.domain:id=xyz"
.war
- a servlet
- WEB-INF/jboss-web.xml wit
A "cheap" way to improve performance would be to run the selector against messages
added to the queue, add references to these messages into a hashtable (key would be
the selector, value would be the sorted message IDs). When reading using a selector,
if it matches a pre-existing optimized sel
Yeah I think that'd be easier. Just assume there's a close and intercept that.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831059#3831059
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831059
--
All,
I am building a Jboss cluster aware perl module for our legacy apps to take advantage
of JBoss clustering and failover by listening to the UDP broadcasts, to maintain a
near realtime list of available nodes.
What is the possibility of me getting the datagram spec?
If this is inappropriate
Actually it doesn't look like aop-all example is using finalize. The first is a read,
then a write, so it looks like it's reading the value, then ++ing it.
Steve
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831058#3831058
Reply to the post :
http://www.jbo
I believe I found a bug in JBoss hot undeploy algorithm. Here is my setup:
- Jboss 3.2.3 running on Linux
- a single .ear archive
- this ear includes: .war archive, .sar archive, and .jar archive:
.sar
- Jboss service with mbean name "my.domain:id=xyz"
.war
- a servlet
- WEB-INF/jboss-web.xml wit
You don't want to use finalize() it isn't guaranteed to be called and even if does get
called, it wrecks gc performance.
A real solution would be to do caller side analysis/weaving:
i.e.
POJOResource pr = new POJOResource;
pr.doSomething();
becomes (pseudo code)
POJOResource pr = POJOResourceMa
Just thinking out loud here. Don't mind me.
Intercept the constructor. Instead of just returning an instance, look up from the
pool (say an ArrayList) the first unused instance. Set a flag to say it's in use and
return the instance.
Intercept the finalize(). In the AOP-all example there's an ex
jbosspool is legacy stuff used in 2.4.x
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831053#3831053
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831053
---
This
It's very minimal, tech oriented. Mostly it's just links to interesting things that
I've found, cuz I hate using bookmarks in browsers.
Steve
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831047#3831047
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?m
Blog
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831048#3831048
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831048
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM L
This is good news. I suggest either localhost by default but overridable or
getHostName by default as opposed to XML. Also maybe the override could be a simple
environment variable that we could use throughout "MS_HOSTNAME=foo.org" for the
build... I don't really want to do a manual edit of a
Thanks :-). I have two step kids as well. ditto on the fun/work.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831043#3831043
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831043
--
Where is your blog steve?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831042#3831042
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831042
---
This SF.Net email i
Hi,
i've a problem when i deploy my project in JBoss 3.2.3.
My project is a J2EE application with samo Entity Bean, two Session Stateless Bean and
some Servlet.
When i try to deploy my project, i receive this error:
19:55:52,421 INFO [MainDeployer] Starting deployment of package:
file:/C:/Progra
Could you please tell me how to clean files from /tmp under Linux?
Thanks
Richard
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831039#3831039
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831039
--
Adrian,
Do you know the state of the jbosspool project in CVS? If it's old and not used, I'll
just mock up a quick one myself.
Steve
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831037#3831037
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb
That is the plan. I'm working on a JCA adapter for the jboss-mail project, but once
I'm done with that I'm going to start working on this.
I need to start picking up JBoss-AOP, so now I have a good excuse :D
Steve
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&
Bugs item #936465, was opened at 2004-04-16 09:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=936465&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Non
Here's a challenge for you: implement it :-)
Adding resource pooling to a pojo with no transaction or security injection would be a
proof
of concept.
Don't worry about the quality of the code, we can tidy that up later with a real
implementation.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/in
Hello,
This is with reference to JBoss 3.2.3 with SonicMQ 5.0 plugin and JDK 1.4.2_01
I have developed about 3 MDBs that are use a simple Request/Reply paradigm. I am
getting a handle to the Response Q in the EJB create method by performing a local JNDI
lookup.
The issue is, the MDB is create
Here's what I blogged earlier this morning.
JCA is a pain. It's complex, it's subtle, and it's easy to mess up. A better solution
would be to define an advisor for any resouce, and generate the necessary JCA
interfaces/managedconnections/factories behind the scenes at classload time.
This would
Yes, exactly.
But also like (I don't know xdoclet but you'll get the idea)
/**
* @jca:pooled
* @jca:secure
* @jca:subject
* @jca:internalsync/externalsync (i.e. JDBC-like or JMS-like, respectively)
* @jca:makehandlesongetters (recurse tree of objects, so you're using handles, never
directl
An interesting idea. A lot of the work in resource adapters follows a number of
patterns and is just boilerplate code.
Are you thinking of something like:
| /**
| * @jca:manageable
| */
| public class POJOResource
| {
| ...
| }
|
Yes, it is already on our list to add aspects/
You can find the configuration file on:
$JBOSS_HOME/server/default/deploy/jbossweb-tomcat41.sar/META-INF/jboss-service.xml
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3830977#3830977
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&
Hi.
I'm putting a system together that requires access to EJBs through a firewall.
Initially I only opened the 1099 port in the firewall, but then I noticed that the
remote objects used different ports. But these ports can be any number. Therefore, I
do not know what rules to add to the firewall
I was wondering if you guys were planning any changes to the JCA infrastructure for
JB4. Specifically, taking advantage of AOP to make things a little easier for people
to write connectors.
I'm writing a proposal for something I've been thinking about that would use advisors
to generate adapter
Hi everyone!
Our customer would like to put the two machines we are clustering our application on
in two different datacenters, 10km distance to each other. Has anyone experience with
that or is it anyhow a good idea to do that, especially considering the latency-times
of the network?
Thx a lot
Need to implement optimized access for a message selector per destination:
e.g.
|
| JMSMessageID=?
| jboss.mq:service=DestinationManager
|
|
See also this thread from jbossmq-user
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=48585
View the original post :
ht
Patches item #936293, was opened at 2004-04-16 15:00
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=936293&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resoluti
Hi jboss developer,
I had already post this question to the forum, but didnt get any feedback, may be
since it was the
wrong forum. I will try to ask here again.
I'm in the process of integration jboss in eclipse to use eclipse as j2ee gui.
(sf.net/projects/jstaff) The
trick is that the jbos
This time I used a jboss-cache.jar compiled from the most recent jboss-head out of
cvs. You mentioned a change in Region.java and I think you got it. With older
jboss-cache.jar's I could always reproduce the dead-lock but never with the new jar in
cvs :-)
But there is no change with the repeata
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
