Some data is kept in the nukes database. MySql users can use the following commands
the to Site Name and Slogan.
update nuke_services_attributes set pn_value = 'Your Web Portal' where pn_aid =
'SiteName';
update nuke_services_attributes set pn_value = 'Slogan' where pn_aid = 'Nukes on
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040420032747Lbuild.36
BUILD COMPLETE-build.36Date of build:04/20/2004 03:27:47Time to build:33 minutes 37 secondsLast changed:04/20/2004 03:13:28Last log entry:No need to check the status in beforeCompletion
Bugs item #938422, was opened at 2004-04-20 08:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=938422group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #935196, was opened at 2004-04-15 02:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by raja05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=935196group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #935196, was opened at 2004-04-15 02:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by raja05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=935196group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #938422, was opened at 2004-04-20 08:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=938422group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040420053929Lbuild.37
BUILD COMPLETE-build.37Date of build:04/20/2004 05:39:29Time to build:30 minutes 25 secondsLast changed:04/20/2004 05:19:00Last log entry:Port logging haircut from 3.2
Unit
Bugs item #938296, was opened at 2004-04-20 04:57
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=938296group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Bugs item #938422, was opened at 2004-04-20 08:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcma12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=938422group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Bugs item #938422, was opened at 2004-04-20 08:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=938422group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Hi,
Will you please clarify the following quires
1. Let us know the service name and attribute for JBoss 3.2.3.
Hope that for jboss 3.2.1 the service name is jboss:service=invoker,type=http and
the attribute is InvokerURLSuffix.
2. Is there is any major difference between Jboss
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040420080736
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: -122Date of build:04/20/2004 08:07:36Time to build:22 minutes 17 secondsLast changed:04/20/2004 07:42:53Last log
Hi,
The JBoss-IDE 1.2.3 is officialy released.
Release 1.2.3 is for Eclipse 2.1 series
Release 1.2.330 is for Eclipse 3.0 series beyond 3.0M8
Installation is available trough the Eclipse install/update manager or trough zip
bundles :
Cool!
As xdoclet is about to release 1.2.1 soon -- is there a way to upgrade the xdoclet
part of JbossIDE on its own?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831566#3831566
Reply to the post :
Bug Fix:
Fix two horrible bugs in the check-valid-connection-sql interaction with the pool.
1) It was attempting to destroy the connections twice which completely broke the
connection counting
leading to min-pool-size overfilling the pool when configured
2) In the same code path, it was
Can someone maybe try deleting the MailServicesPatches Wiki page to delete the
attached file I created? Then recreate MailServicesPatches with the above stuff?
It looks like there is a different want to add patches, where the sample patches
weren't tied to the bottom of the page itself, but
Relax :-)
I restored it to the original version (looks like the patch is still attached).
You can do this by going to More Info... at the bottom of any Wiki page to view the
full history :-)
Dunno about deleting the files though.
View the original post :
Open the history item you want, and on the version of the page displayed there is a
restore link!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831586#3831586
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831586
Weird. I don't see the restore link. Maybe you have different admin rights? I see the
diffs -/+, but I don't see a restore link.
Anyways, thanks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831588#3831588
Reply to the post :
Hi,
!!! IMPORTANT !!!
JUST AFTER THE RELEASE, A BLOCKING BUG WAS FOUND IN THE LAUNCHER PART OF JBOSS-IDE.
PLEASE DON'T UPGRADE NOW AS THE BUNDLE WILL BE RE-RELEASED !!!
Laurent.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831589#3831589
Reply to the post
Hi,
Just after the annoucement of the release, a blocking bug has been discovered in the
launcher plugin. The main effect is that the server view is not properly working.
I have decided to freeze the release and to rebundle the release.
To those who have upgraded, you will have to manually
Click on the number in the list rather than the links in the Date or Changes columns.
I'd not seen the difs before, but now I know!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831593#3831593
Reply to the post :
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040420105755
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build:04/20/2004 10:57:55Time to build:22 minutes 43 secondsLast changed:04/20/2004 10:20:06Last log
Okay, I still have a good bit of testing to do on this, so please, in no way consider
it useful yet. I even need to re-format the code to JBG's likings. If you don't put it
in the tree yet, that's fine, I just wanted to give someone (if they cared) an idea of
what I'm doing.
View the
Ah ha! Click the number. Now I know too.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831600#3831600
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831600
---
This
hi,
I was wondering why i need to create a group (cluster-config) in local-service.xml
even if i want to run jboss cache in stand alone mode.(local) The reason im asking
this is im getting errors
UDP.handleIncomingUdpPacket(): exception=java.io.InvalidClassException:
Bugs item #937767, was opened at 2004-04-19 12:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=937767group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Maybe. Have a patch? I like left-join, though.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831614#3831614
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831614
---
Repost of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=937767group_id=22866
I applaud the new the left-join read ahead option but
the xml descriptors in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml are difficult
to configure. reasons for descriptor change are:
1.) for each query I wish to left-join, I have
This is great stuff claude.
I am a bit fuzzy on the use of the synchronous call. What would be the use case for
that?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831618#3831618
Reply to the post :
well Scott is talking about just an abstract keyword (thread local) to identify a
given configuration. Is that what you are talking about.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831621#3831621
Reply to the post :
Affirmative.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831625#3831625
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831625
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Marc,
I am certainly not getting your question.
Are u asking for user-case to justify the use of asynchronous call
versus synchronous call ?
Thx-Claude
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831646#3831646
Reply to the post :
Bugs item #938808, was opened at 2004-04-20 08:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=938808group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #938804, was opened at 2004-04-20 21:42
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=938804group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #938808, was opened at 2004-04-20 08:43
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cwampler
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=938808group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040420142207Lbuild.38
BUILD COMPLETE-build.38Date of build:04/20/2004 14:22:07Time to build:142 minutes 14 seconds
Unit Tests: (0)No Tests Run
Bugs item #938804, was opened at 2004-04-20 12:42
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=938804group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
I ran the build.xml file in the examples directory of Jboss and moved the deploy
folder accordingly to use Tomcat 5.0.x instead of embedded 4.1.x. I am having a
problem though when deploying my web app into the server. I get the following message:
Already exists, unregistering
Plain old bug: we're creating the Channel no matter what. Can you create a bug report
in SourceForge, and I'll take care of it ?
Bela
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831666#3831666
Reply to the post :
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040420164924Lbuild.39
BUILD COMPLETE-build.39Date of build:04/20/2004 16:49:24Time to build:22 minutes 24 secondsLast changed:04/20/2004 16:23:48Last log entry:make build handle different branches
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040420203214Lbuild.40
BUILD COMPLETE-build.40Date of build:04/20/2004 20:32:14Time to build:23 minutes 4 secondsLast changed:04/20/2004 18:09:08Last log entry:Check the string buffer length before removing any trailing
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040420214350Lbuild.41
BUILD COMPLETE-build.41Date of build:04/20/2004 21:43:50Time to build:12 minutes 57 secondsLast changed:04/20/2004 21:30:37Last log entry:synchronized access to getCurrentState()
Are you talking about the new ejb timer implementation?
If so, would you rather see it using the jmx timer service?
Steve Coy
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831678#3831678
Reply to the post :
Does the new Thomas Diesler implementaiton still use the Scheduler? That thing is a
piece of crap. So yes, use the jms timer service if you can. Scott is also
interested in integrating Quartz. Not sure if it if applicable in this situation
though.
Bill
View the original post :
Actually, I see now that Adrian is talking about the implementation of
BootstrapContext.createTimer().
As far as Thomas' ejb timer implementation is concerned, it is just using
java.util.Timer.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831688#3831688
51 matches
Mail list logo
