[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-993105 ] Reflection#makeReflective could reject some reflections

2004-07-17 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #993105, was opened at 2004-07-18 11:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=993105&group_id=22866 Category: Javassist Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolutio

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-993090 ] Loader#findClass should throw ClassNotFoundException

2004-07-17 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #993090, was opened at 2004-07-18 10:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=993090&group_id=22866 Category: Javassist Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolutio

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: HTML block

2004-07-17 Thread cooper
is the block persisted in database ? that may overrdide the .xml setting View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842496#3842496 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3842496

[JBoss-dev] [EJB on JBoss] - Re: One to many relationship only shows last record in table

2004-07-17 Thread triathlon98
CHeck the multiplicity of your link. Are you sure the other side is allowed to be linked (that is, you may need other-side-multiple, or else you are effectively building a 1-1 link). Joachim View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842493#3842493 Repl

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Error running Jboss from the Eclipse ide

2004-07-17 Thread alanmcl
Thanks I have done this and it now works Alanmcl View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842489#3842489 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3842489 ---

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Using JBossCache with WebLogic 8.1 and WebSphere 5.1

2004-07-17 Thread bela
good ! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842488#3842488 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3842488 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-992657 ] optiond-refresh-rate doesn't synch the cache, it destroys it

2004-07-17 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #992657, was opened at 2004-07-16 17:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ari7419 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=992657&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priori

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-992651 ] NoPassivationCachePolicy incompatible with optiond

2004-07-17 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #992651, was opened at 2004-07-16 17:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ari7419 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=992651&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Rejected Priorit

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: JBoss-IDE and Eclipse 2.1

2004-07-17 Thread sgwood
Maybe the JBoss IDE project page should make a reference to this poll. How many JBoss IDE users lok at the forum? Sherman View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842480#3842480 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2 build.150 Build Successful

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040717040656Lbuild.150 BUILD COMPLETE - build.150Date of build: 07/17/2004 04:06:56Time to build: 10 minutes 46 secondsLast changed: 07/17/2004 03:46:56Last log entry: implemented Monitorable

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-07-17 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-992654 ] JMX Console and NoPassivationCachePolicy

2004-07-17 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #992654, was opened at 2004-07-17 03:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=992654&group_id=22866 >Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Prio

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-992657 ] optiond-refresh-rate doesn't synch the cache, it destroys it

2004-07-17 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #992657, was opened at 2004-07-17 03:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=992657&group_id=22866 >Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-992651 ] NoPassivationCachePolicy incompatible with optiond

2004-07-17 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #992651, was opened at 2004-07-17 03:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=992651&group_id=22866 >Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Rejected P

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Connection of TreeCache with Client Apps

2004-07-17 Thread victor.sauermann
Okay, therefore it is possible to connect the client as Listener for the TreeCache? Greetinx Vic View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842465#3842465 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3842465 ---