Hi Pedro,
thanks for your answer. I experienced those two things and it is very good that they
are fixed in 3.2.6RC1. Unfortunately, I think, that this doesn't resolve all problems.
One main problem still remains: in case the master node loses network connection no
new master node is ellected.
I just verified this works on the latest version of JBossCache (CVS head), which I'm
going to release this week (JBossCache 1.1).
I'm going to backport this to JBoss 3.2.x, but for now you should be able to just take
JBossCache 1.1 and use it with 3.2.x out of the box.
Bela
View the original
For some reason, I can no longer use the packaging configuration dialog. It does not
appear in the list of options I can choose when I right click on a project and click
properties.
The server navigator is still present, and I can still right click on an entry and
deploy it to a server. Any
Under (relatively) heavy load LRUAlgorithm for some reason tries to remove the same
node twice. Result is java.lang.RuntimeException: LRUAlgorithm.evict(): null node map
entry for fqn: /test1/node835264.
Test case. local-eviction-service.xml is used. Default region - 5000 nodes max. LRU
Seems that exactly this error already been posted on this forum
http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=52457
as far as I see it's still exists.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3845885#3845885
Reply to the post :
had same thing exactly ,
when i switched to rpc instead of document it was fine
but i still dont know what cause that exception
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3845892#3845892
Reply to the post :
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040823124249Lbuild.10
BUILD COMPLETE-build.10Date of build:08/23/2004 12:42:49Time to build:26 minutes 22 secondsLast changed:08/23/2004 12:22:49Last log entry:Fix the eclipse build
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040823134238Lbuild.11
BUILD COMPLETE-build.11Date of build:08/23/2004 13:42:38Time to build:26 minutes 0 secondsLast changed:08/23/2004 13:20:09Last log entry:added version number
Bugs item #1014373, was opened at 2004-08-23 16:25
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1014373group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040823141552Lbuild.21
BUILD COMPLETE-build.21Date of build:08/23/2004 14:15:52Time to build:39 minutes 22 secondsLast changed:08/23/2004 13:35:44Last log entry:cosmetic
Unit
Bela,
thanks for your quick response. I had one more question regarding the atomicity of the
put(...) call. Can I assume put on a JGroups replicated object would have the same
semantics as a local collection with respect to concurrency, i.e. is it guaranteed
that in the event of a concurrent
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040823151349Lbuild.12
BUILD COMPLETE-build.12Date of build:08/23/2004 15:13:49Time to build:38 minutes 52 secondsLast changed:08/23/2004 14:35:25Last log entry:Introducing
Guess I was just happy to get commit rights :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3845921#3845921
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3845921
---
Is RC3 the final release canadate for Nukes 1.1? When are we hoping to ship 1.1?
Also, what is the criteria for module inclusion in HEAD versus the 1.1 branch? I know
HEAD is for new features along with bug fixes and 1.1 is for bug fixes but since I
haven't been around till now to see things
Hi,
Since I have just refactored the eviction policy last week, I have tried your test
case on the latest code on jboss-head. I don't see any error right now. So can you try
it yourself to make sure the problem is resolved?
I will incorporate your test case.
Thanks,
-Ben
View the original
Julien would answer better than me but in the meantime:
RC3 should be the last before 1.1 unless it's not :)
1.1 will follow depending on bug reports.
Other modules may be incomplete or unstable or haven't been maintained or just left on
the side as they may need a new daddy to take care of
Bugs item #1005271, was opened at 2004-08-07 21:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1005271group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority:
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040823163708Lbuild.13
BUILD COMPLETE-build.13Date of build:08/23/2004 16:37:08Time to build:30 minutes 55 secondsLast changed:08/23/2004 16:13:17Last log entry:upgraded to Sleepycat JE 1.5.1
chasetec wrote : Is RC3 the final release canadate for Nukes 1.1? When are we hoping
to ship 1.1?
|
Perhaps, everything seems fine except some bugs in the download module :-). Frankly I
think yes, and according to the number of bug you are fixing it will be ok. We will
wait for you to fix
Bugs item #1005213, was opened at 2004-08-07 17:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1005213group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040823173316Lbuild.14
BUILD COMPLETE-build.14Date of build:08/23/2004 17:33:16Time to build:27 minutes 31 secondsLast changed:08/23/2004 16:57:19Last log entry:Added XMBean
Bugs item #1005213, was opened at 2004-08-07 12:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mjremijan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1005213group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
i was wondering why all the TreeCache methods throw Exception instead of something
more specific?
for example, setIsolationLevel does:
| if(tmp_level == null) {
| throw new Exception(TreeCache.setIsolationLevel(): level \ + level +
\ is invalid);
| }
|
why not
Bugs item #1005213, was opened at 2004-08-07 12:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mjremijan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1005213group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Bugs item #1014373, was opened at 2004-08-23 16:25
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by daemon23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1014373group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #1005271, was opened at 2004-08-07 17:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by javajedi
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1005271group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Bugs item #1005271, was opened at 2004-08-07 21:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1005271group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority:
No, this is not guaranteed; you need TXs for this (at least across VMs, locally we
sync on the data on access)
Bela
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3845943#3845943
Reply to the post :
You are absolutely right, changed 2 new Exception clauses to new IllegalArgEx.
The put()/get()/remove() etc methods have already been changed (recently). They now
type their exceptions more specifically.
It would be great if you could point me to some methods I have overlooked.
Bela
View the
ok, great.
i've been looking at the 3.2 cvs branch. should i go ahead and move to the head? is
the head jboss-cache code compatible with the 3.2 server?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3845946#3845946
Reply to the post :
Bugs item #1014373, was opened at 2004-08-23 07:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1014373group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Bugs item #1005213, was opened at 2004-08-07 17:55
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1005213group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040823204202Lbuild.15
BUILD COMPLETE-build.15Date of build:08/23/2004 20:42:02Time to build:26 minutes 41 secondsLast changed:08/23/2004 20:14:49Last log entry:emits eviction notification now
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040823212746Lbuild.22
BUILD COMPLETE-build.22Date of build:08/23/2004 21:27:46Time to build:24 minutes 41 secondsLast changed:08/23/2004 21:07:46Last log entry:cosmetic
Unit
How should I model method expressions in the annotation XML? Can I use the same syntax
used to describe pointcut expressions ? I have a method that takes an array of objects
and I tried to model the annotation xml as
|
| annotation tag=default class=test.TestServiceBean
| method
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040823220923Lbuild.16
BUILD COMPLETE-build.16Date of build:08/23/2004 22:09:23Time to build:25 minutes 55 secondsLast changed:08/23/2004 21:05:48Last log entry:Added currencyTimeLimit to the
View results here -> http://jboss.kimptoc.net/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040824014106Lbuild.17
BUILD COMPLETE-build.17Date of build:08/24/2004 01:41:06Time to build:22 minutes 1 secondLast changed:08/24/2004 01:21:06Last log entry:Fix the message endpont tranasction
Bugs item #1014441, was opened at 2004-08-23 17:56
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1014441group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
I posted this question on August 19th and it seems like a simple question but no one
replied. When I set EnableTransformer to true in the
jboss/server/default/conf/jboss-service.xml config file and restart the server I get
loads of stack traces. I'm using RC1. Should this feature work? Is
Sorry, I've been giving training for the last wek and a half
I did not test JBoss integration with JB4 RC1 yet as I have not released JBoss AOP
Beta4(even though it comes bundled with JB4 RC1). You may have to revert AOP back to
Beta3.
If you can send me a simple test case, I can add it
Bugs item #993783, was opened at 2004-07-19 13:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=993783group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
41 matches
Mail list logo
