[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: CMP/BMP howto

2004-09-09 Thread s5554
You don't have read the whole book, ch3 and its example is enough. When get along with the example and understand it, the JBoss-IDE part is rather straightforward if laborious. The learning curve is not so gentle. Risto View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: CMP/BMP howto

2004-09-09 Thread emmitt1219
thanks. i will definitely look into that book! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847616#3847616 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3847616 ---

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: commons-fileupload question

2004-09-09 Thread chamcha
chasetec wrote : Is there a size limit? yes, but you can set it as large as you want. chasetec wrote : Is the entire upload stored in memory until fully uploaded? | only if you want. In fact, you can set a threshold for the memory buffer. Files greater than threshold limit are hold in

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-576913 ] OutOfMemory after redeploys

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #576913, was opened at 2002-07-03 15:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sflexus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=576913group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-973162 ] OutOfMemoryError Deployment

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #973162, was opened at 2004-06-15 14:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sflexus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=973162group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - Re: J2EE compatible web services

2004-09-09 Thread darranl
Thanks Scott, I will put together some test cases and raise this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847626#3847626 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3847626

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-973162 ] OutOfMemoryError Deployment

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #973162, was opened at 2004-06-15 11:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=973162group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - JBossWS xdoclet tags

2004-09-09 Thread schrouf
Is it right, that that for JBossWS in 3.2-branch and head all @jboss-net-tags have changed from @jboss-net:xxx to @jboss-net.xxx ? If yes, why ? xdoclet tag format consistency ? Regards Ulf View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847629#3847629 Reply

[JBoss-dev] [Management on JBoss] - Adding NotificationFilters to the listeners of JBossMonitor

2004-09-09 Thread gabramovic
I have been looking into using JBoss monitoring framework for my services over past few days. I have noticed that there is no way of adding NotificationFilters to the listeners of ThresholdMonitor via the deployment descriptor. Am I correct, or I am just shortsighted? I know that I cam always

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1024653 ] cache invalidation RO/RW doesn't work

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1024653, was opened at 2004-09-08 21:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pedrosalazar You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1024653group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1025035 ] Warning message not found when deploying WS4EE Web Service

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1025035, was opened at 2004-09-09 11:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1025035group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v4.0 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - Custom Exceptions from Webservice

2004-09-09 Thread DaveyS
I have got webservices being deployed from EJB endpoints using JBoss 4.0RC2 (Win XP) and they work OK. I have some methods that I want to expost from my EJB as webservices, however they throw custom exceptions. When I deploy them to JBoss I get the error below. Presumably I have to have a

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-973162 ] OutOfMemoryError Deployment

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #973162, was opened at 2004-06-15 04:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=973162group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - Re: Custom Exceptions from Webservice

2004-09-09 Thread schrouf
Have you marked your exception class with an xdoclet @jbossnet.xml-schema tag e.g @jboss-net.xml-schema urn=myService:CominoException; so a type mapping entry will be generated in your webservice deployment descriptor ? Regards Ulf View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [TODO -- DEVELOPMENT] - 4.0.0 Release tasks (Repost)

2004-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a dynamic list of the issues to complete for the 4.0.0 release. I will merge any new posts to this one and update the status as needed. Migrate ant 1.6.x testuite changes for finer grained control over the jboss server configuration under test from 3.2. Assigned to Scott. Status: in

[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - Re: Custom Exceptions from Webservice

2004-09-09 Thread DaveyS
No, I haven't as I'm not using XDoclet. Do you have an example of what I need to put into the deployment descriptor (I presume you mean ws4ee-deployment.xml). Cheers. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847666#3847666 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-dev] [XDoclet on JBoss (XDoclet/JBoss)] - Re: @jboss.target-realtion support for jdbc-type and sql-typ

2004-09-09 Thread pilhuhn
a) you should ask on the xdoclet MLs b) There is someone working on this currently and hopefully will submit a patch soon. If b) happens soon enough, then it will be in 1.2.2 My plan is to release 1.2.2 end of this month. View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss Media (EMB)] - Re: Is anybody working/using EMB?

2004-09-09 Thread darranl
Have these changes afftected the build for the testsuite? I have just checked out a clean copy of jboss-head and executed build in the build module which completes without any problems. Then when I execute build in the testsuite module I get the following errors: - [javac] Compiling 1805

[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - Re: Custom Exceptions from Webservice

2004-09-09 Thread schrouf
Have a look at http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WSTypeMapping and customize to your needs :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847685#3847685 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3847685

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss Media (EMB)] - Re: Is anybody working/using EMB?

2004-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resynch your workspace again. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847686#3847686 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3847686 --- This SF.Net email

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-973162 ] OutOfMemoryError Deployment

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #973162, was opened at 2004-06-15 14:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sflexus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=973162group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-973162 ] OutOfMemoryError Deployment

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #973162, was opened at 2004-06-15 04:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=973162group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-973162 ] OutOfMemoryError Deployment

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #973162, was opened at 2004-06-15 14:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sflexus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=973162group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - ReplicationInterceptor incorrect behaviour in rollback

2004-09-09 Thread octopus
When transaction is being rolled back there's a NPE in afterCompletion: | [OrderedSynchronizationHandler] failed calling afterCompletion() on org.jboss.cache.interceptors.Repli | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | java.lang.NullPointerException | at

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss Media (EMB)] - Re: Is anybody working/using EMB?

2004-09-09 Thread darranl
Thanks Scott, that sorted the problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847697#3847697 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3847697 --- This

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Nukes language property file normalization

2004-09-09 Thread cnovara
I'm working on localization, and thus on .properties files. Here is my feeling on keys standards (anyway it's a bit late) : Full uppercase, OK looks like C constants ; Show hierarchy with underscore, OK dots are already hardly used ; But should we delete the first underscore ? It's is so widely

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.99 Build Successful

2004-09-09 Thread rcampbell
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040909155840Lbuild.99 BUILD COMPLETE-build.99Date of build:09/09/2004 15:58:40Time to build:16 minutes 24 secondsLast changed:09/09/2004 15:50:42Last log entry:fixed NPE in

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1025403 ] Bug and fix in WrapperConnection.java

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1025403, was opened at 2004-09-09 20:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1025403group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v4.0 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.100 Build Successful

2004-09-09 Thread rcampbell
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040909164002Lbuild.100 BUILD COMPLETE-build.100Date of build:09/09/2004 16:40:02Time to build:13 minutes 53 secondsLast changed:09/09/2004 16:07:54Last log entry:Set

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: ConcurrentModificationException in log.debug() statement

2004-09-09 Thread norbert
I've notices these kind of exceptions in many areas of jboss-cache's 'toString()' methods... It's because all the Collections being used (e.g. ArrayList for readOwnerList in LockMap.java, HashMap for data in Node.java ... ) are all unsynchronized and throw ConcurrentModificationException

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: ConcurrentModificationException in log.debug() statement

2004-09-09 Thread norbert
e.g. in NodeMap it dosn't help that the method readerOwners() is synchronized, but the Collection (readOwnerList_) being returned by it being unsynchronized. It wouldn't even help to make the IdentityLock.toString()-method synchronized, since the JVM's lock on the IdentityLock instance does not

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: ConcurrentModificationException in log.debug() statement

2004-09-09 Thread norbert
btw: this is not just an issue of debugging - other methods like the various 'printInfo()' (even in TreeCache()) eventually throwsConcurrentModificationException when being called while the cache is in use. If we want to keep the underlying Collections unsynchronized for performance-reasons,

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: exception design

2004-09-09 Thread norbert
I agree. It's a good idea to make LockingException und TimeoutException subclasses of a CachingException, but it would be better if the method's signatures explicitly list the exceptions that actually may be thrown. The caller would still be free to just use a 'catch (CacheException ..)'

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - JBoss IDE - EJB3 support

2004-09-09 Thread ivelin
The JBoss IDE team will begin implementing EJB3 support in an upcoming version. Let's discuss the roadmap. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847738#3847738 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1025403 ] Bug and fix in WrapperConnection.java

2004-09-09 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1025403, was opened at 2004-09-09 20:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1025403group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v4.0 Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.101 Build Successful

2004-09-09 Thread rcampbell
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040909183159Lbuild.101 BUILD COMPLETE-build.101Date of build:09/09/2004 18:31:59Time to build:15 minutes 14 secondsLast changed:09/09/2004 18:07:37Last log entry:Persistent ejb-timer

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.102 Build Successful

2004-09-09 Thread rcampbell
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040909192020Lbuild.102 BUILD COMPLETE-build.102Date of build:09/09/2004 19:20:20Time to build:15 minutes 34 secondsLast changed:09/09/2004 18:56:32Last log entry:Handle the case of the

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: ConcurrentModificationException in log.debug() statement

2004-09-09 Thread bwang00
I think this is a good point. I can see this exception probably doesn't happen that often with REPEATABLE_READ and up. But with more relaxed isolation levels, it can be a problem. Bela and I will be meeting soon. We should visit issue. What do you think, Bela? -Ben View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Cache locality

2004-09-09 Thread bwang00
If LOCAL is not what you want, and you want cache partitioning, we don't have this feature yet. It's on the todo list. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847748#3847748 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: reload after eviction in a clustered config

2004-09-09 Thread bwang00
The CacheLoader in 1.1 release can persist the evicted data. So you can retrieve from the backend store the next time. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847750#3847750 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: reload after eviction in a clustered config

2004-09-09 Thread visionlink
bwang00 wrote : The CacheLoader in 1.1 release can persist the evicted data. So you can retrieve from the backend store the next time. | when the CacheLoader reads the transient data from the data store, does it do a put on the cache? that is, does it replicate the data to the rest of the

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.103 Build Successful

2004-09-09 Thread rcampbell
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040909195733Lbuild.103 BUILD COMPLETE-build.103Date of build:09/09/2004 19:57:33Time to build:15 minutes 9 secondsLast changed:09/09/2004 19:51:51Last log entry:Install a

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Wiki module?

2004-09-09 Thread cookman
Nukes integrates with JSPWiki, you can search wiki in the nukes user forum View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847756#3847756 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3847756

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Wiki module?

2004-09-09 Thread jae77
this site uses a modified version of jspwiki. here are two links on the topic http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=50376 http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=47376 there have been other discussions about buiilding a native wiki module, but no one has taken

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.104 Build Successful

2004-09-09 Thread rcampbell
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040909204952Lbuild.104 BUILD COMPLETE-build.104Date of build:09/09/2004 20:49:52Time to build:18 minutes 38 secondsLast changed:09/09/2004 20:37:36Last log entry:Add the missing transition

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Wiki module?

2004-09-09 Thread rjlawre
Thanks for the pointers, I'll give this a try. As to a native module, xwiki (http://www.xwiki.org/) has some JSR-168 portlet support, so maybe in nukes 2, it will just plug right in :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847758#3847758 Reply to the

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.105 Build Successful

2004-09-09 Thread rcampbell
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040909213833Lbuild.105 BUILD COMPLETE-build.105Date of build:09/09/2004 21:38:33Time to build:13 minutes 31 secondsLast changed:09/09/2004 20:56:49Last log entry:Add logging of all RMI

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Feature Overview

2004-09-09 Thread marshall
These are the current JBossIDE/EJB3 target features. I'll probably be able to come back and expand upon each one of these if need be. Support for content assist in all EJB3 annotations Datasource management. (required for the next 3 to be possible..) EJBQL Execution Source code generation

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.106 Build Successful

2004-09-09 Thread rcampbell
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040909232426Lbuild.106 BUILD COMPLETE-build.106Date of build:09/09/2004 23:24:26Time to build:12 minutes 58 secondsLast changed:09/09/2004 23:11:23Last log entry:We need to establish the

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: marshalling transactions

2004-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dealing with transaction marshalling/unmarshalling needs to be pulled out of all invokers. This should be handled by the new marshalling layer and the marshallers for the various (javax.transaction.Transaction, transport) keys installed by the transaction manager service. View the original