View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910034655Lbuild.107
BUILD COMPLETE - build.107Date of build: 09/10/2004 03:46:55Time to build: 15 minutes 24 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 03:39:18Last log entry: added isStoreRequired
Bugs item #1025642, was opened at 2004-09-10 03:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1025642&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolutio
Bugs item #1024653, was opened at 2004-09-08 23:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1024653&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invali
Bugs item #1025035, was opened at 2004-09-09 11:32
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by tdiesler
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1025035&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
So since I started this thread a few months ago, I thought I'd chime back in. Bill,
thanks for your very thorough description, but now I have one more question: I've been
doing more reasearch on AOP overall and more research on AspectJ and JBossAOP. Now I'm
not sure that I'll be phrasing thsi ri
my company (10 empl., several hundred instances of J2EE-application-servers) is
planning to use JBoss application-server in production starting 2005. I'll be
technically responsible for this.
>From an enterprise customers standpoint anything that is known to fail 'every now and
>then' is not
Hi
After long time I had a fresh look at my code and it happend the exception is _my_
fault. Sorry guys.
During "around Forum construction" I've returned object of different class, so that
was the cause.
Sorry for this, once more..
t.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040910090819Lbuild.33
BUILD COMPLETE - build.33Date of build: 09/10/2004 09:08:19Time to build: 13 minutes 52 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 08:55:44Last log entry: made container-cache-conf
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040910012145Lbuild.31
BUILD COMPLETE - build.31Date of build: 09/10/2004 01:21:45Time to build: 9 minutes 55 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 01:15:55Last log entry: HSQL DB 1.7.2 benefits fro
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910213744Lbuild.119
BUILD COMPLETE - build.119Date of build: 09/10/2004 21:37:44Time to build: 12 minutes 6 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 21:25:22Last log entry: Add tests for message-d
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910204651
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:80: exec returned: 1Date of build: 09/10/2004 20:46:51Time to build: 9 minutes 16 secondsLast changed: 09/1
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910194655Lbuild.118
BUILD COMPLETE - build.118Date of build: 09/10/2004 19:46:55Time to build: 13 minutes 22 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 19:40:23Last log entry: A test CallbackHandler
http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewforum&f=201
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847767#3847767
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3847767
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910180856Lbuild.116
BUILD COMPLETE - build.116Date of build: 09/10/2004 18:08:56Time to build: 18 minutes 41 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 17:52:05Last log entry: Redefine the id of an
ivelin wrote:
The JBoss IDE team will begin implementing EJB3 support in an upcoming version. Let's discuss the roadmap.
Ivelin, great news. I have already checked out Bill's and Gavin's
xpetstore EJB3 port and implemented some examples based on DR4 und RC1.
For this early stage of development th
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910092542Lbuild.112
BUILD COMPLETE - build.112Date of build: 09/10/2004 09:25:42Time to build: 14 minutes 23 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 09:09:06Last log entry: Added constructor call
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910055119Lbuild.110
BUILD COMPLETE - build.110Date of build: 09/10/2004 05:51:19Time to build: 16 minutes 34 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 05:31:35Last log entry: Add some more trace le
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910065303Lbuild.111
BUILD COMPLETE - build.111Date of build: 09/10/2004 06:53:03Time to build: 16 minutes 19 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 06:32:04Last log entry: Fixed typo example xml
Bugs item #973162, was opened at 2004-06-15 14:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sflexus
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=973162&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
S
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910173122Lbuild.115
BUILD COMPLETE - build.115Date of build: 09/10/2004 17:31:22Time to build: 13 minutes 6 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 17:20:43Last log entry: Commented out for now
Hi,
I'm having problems with replication at startup of a second cache.
Using the code below, I'm starting 2 CacheTest applications (each configured as a
replicated asyn service), one as a server the other as a client.
1. I start the server first, it adds objects into the cache (under /a/b) ok.
i'll take a look at xwiki and see what the possibilities are.
julien: didn't you say that bill wrote a parser for wiki html tags, where can i find
that?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847809#3847809
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org
We are staying with Eclipse 2.1 for the time being since there are still some major
bugs in the 3.0 version. So please do not stop supporting 2.1 yet.
Thanks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847805#3847805
Reply to the post :
http://www.jbo
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040910153254Lbuild.35
BUILD COMPLETE - build.35Date of build: 09/10/2004 15:32:54Time to build: 11 minutes 43 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 15:16:31Last log entry: Fixed distributable tag f
Best way is turn on DEBUG log tracing in org.jboss.cache to see how it actually works.
If it is doing replication, you should see it something like _put()...
Or opening up a TreeCacheView GUI (see build.xml for details) to be in the same group.
You will see it visually.
-Ben
View the original
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040910135323Lbuild.34
BUILD COMPLETE - build.34Date of build: 09/10/2004 13:53:23Time to build: 15 minutes 48 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 13:22:01Last log entry: Don't leak untrapped thro
Hello,
It's been like this for 6 hours now..
cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss login
Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvsroot/jboss
CVS password:
cvs login: authorization failed: server cvs.sourceforge.net rejected
access to /cvsroot/jboss for user anonymous
Other SF pr
I know about this - It's a decision whether to stay downwards compatible or change an
API for reasons of better design that helps to stay downwards-compatible later...
Any way - if we keep it this way (and there are good reasons for this) we must put in
the release-notes that this change might b
We are staying with Eclipse 2.1 for the time being since there are still some major
bugs in the 3.0 version. So please do not stop supporting 2.1 yet.
Thanks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847804#3847804
Reply to the post :
http://www.jbo
bela:
the price is that a business-transaction might fail just because loglevel is set to
'INFO'
I don't think this is a real good idea.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847821#3847821
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?m
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910111017Lbuild.114
BUILD COMPLETE - build.114Date of build: 09/10/2004 11:10:17Time to build: 13 minutes 22 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 10:37:16Last log entry: Add ejb-timer recovery
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910103123Lbuild.113
BUILD COMPLETE - build.113Date of build: 09/10/2004 10:31:23Time to build: 14 minutes 5 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 10:05:46Last log entry: Add ejb-timer recovery,
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040910063549Lbuild.32
BUILD COMPLETE - build.32Date of build: 09/10/2004 06:35:49Time to build: 10 minutes 22 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 06:00:26Last log entry: added isStoreRequired met
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910050941Lbuild.109
BUILD COMPLETE - build.109Date of build: 09/10/2004 05:09:41Time to build: 13 minutes 57 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 04:27:33Last log entry: result of merging Conc
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040910042210Lbuild.108
BUILD COMPLETE - build.108Date of build: 09/10/2004 04:22:10Time to build: 15 minutes 21 secondsLast changed: 09/10/2004 04:13:30Last log entry: Add the missing call-e
Bugs item #973162, was opened at 2004-06-15 14:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sflexus
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=973162&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
S
No, it doesn't replicate: we use _put() (the internal put()).
You can also write your own CacheLoader impl, which could delegate to another Cache,
resulting in a cache hierarchy
Bela
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847773#3847773
Reply to the
The problem with these strongly typed exceptions is that various interceptors that
are going to be added in the future (or customer-supplied ones) might throw other
exceptions, e.g. my example SecurityInterceptor throws a SecurityException (*not* a
runtime exception).
This would have to be refl
Yes. I'm willing to pay the price for occasional exceptions though in print() methods,
but would not want to synchronize them at all.
Norbert et al: Keep those bug reports coming !
Bela
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847771#3847771
Reply to
39 matches
Mail list logo