No, the code looks okay. I'd suggest however to run it inside JBoss.TC5, and make the
TreeCache an *MBean*. This way, all servlets can access it, and it can be
independently redeployed.
Regarding the dom4j: make sure you have the dom4j.jar in the lib dir of TC.
Bela
View the original post :
h
Have you set "As JRE Library Use" in Window->Preferences->Java->BuildPath to "JRE_LIB
variable" ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853035#3853035
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853035
--
bela, I have solved the problem. After analysised the error log, it seems failed
because of MBean. But I have no time to implement a MBean inside tomcat, so I try to
deploy the web application in tomcat 4.1.29, then everything is ok. A strange error,
Isn't it?
View the original post :
http://w
You have to enable JSP-Compilation in the Preferences for your Project. Be sure to set
the root-directory correctly (e.g. DocRoot).
Mark
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853050#3853050
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=
Bugs item #1056004, was opened at 2004-10-28 13:42
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1056004&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #1056004, was opened at 2004-10-28 13:42
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1056004&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Prior
Bugs item #1046721, was opened at 2004-10-14 03:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1046721&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #1056048, was opened at 2004-10-28 14:09
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1056048&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults?log=log20041028074022
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:59: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:34: Exit
Hi.
I've updated JBossAOP to FINAL version and have problem with my XML entities which I
access from XML my-aop-file.xml file.
Here's the code:
| $cd /home/nthx/private/YYY/Project/
| $ls
| configurations/
| src/
| build.xml
|
|
| $cat /home/nthx/private/YYY/Project/conf
Bugs item #1042176, was opened at 2004-10-07 11:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tdiesler
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1042176&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Prior
Bugs item #1056073, was opened at 2004-10-28 12:50
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1056073&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Sorry, I meant
|
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853077#3853077
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853077
---
Show me the message that your client sends to JBossWS. For that set
|
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853076#3853076
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853076
-
The message the sample client sends is
|
|
| http://org.jboss.webservice/complexbean/types";>
|
| MiddleWare Avenue 1
| cuid_1
| JBoss Inc.
|
|
| SomeOther Street 11
| cuid_2
| Microsoft Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
| te
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults?log=log20041028081652
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:62: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:34: Exit
Hi Bela
Are any of these tasks still up for grabs? I've just returned from the JBoss Advanced
Training, and have always had a keen interest in cacheing products/mechanisms and
distributed stores. I can provide more details of my interests/work if needed, I'd
just like to know if this work is
Hello all,
I am using the following web.xml in my web service war:
http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd";>
omutilServlet
omservice.OmutilSoapBindingImpl
omutilServlet
/omutilServlet
When I first startup jboss 4, my web service is deployed and functions correctly.
However
jboss must always (not just after restart) replace the element,
because tomcat will not accept a pojo there.
Is it true, that the start element is missing? It should be
|
org.jboss.webservice.server.ServiceEndpointServletJSE
|
Is there a stacktrace at startup time?
View the origin
This is what client sends,
|
| http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
| xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
| mlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
| xmlns:enc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/";
| xmlns:ns0="http://org.jboss.webserv
Hi,
The XML-RPC term is often used throughout the JBoss documentation, and I guess it's
refering to JAX-RPC/SOAP, I know that the later is based on XML and that it is RPC, so
technically speaking it is not wrong to refer to JAX-RPC/SOAP as an XML-RPC type of
thingy, but as XML-RPC is also a spe
Bugs item #1054942, was opened at 2004-10-26 16:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1054942&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priorit
Bugs item #1054894, was opened at 2004-10-26 15:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1054894&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priori
Bugs item #1053277, was opened at 2004-10-24 10:16
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1053277&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v4.0
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Prior
Bugs item #1054897, was opened at 2004-10-26 15:15
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1054897&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priorit
More on this. Since I could not get the "echoCustomerOrder" method working with the
supplied
WSDL file, I switched the WSDL file with another of type rcp-literal. I used the
wscompile
command as below to generate this new WSDL file.
wscompile -cp ../../output-samples/classes -gen:server -f:wsi
each of CacheLoaderInterceptor, ReplicationInterceptor, and TransactionInterceptor
has a list of transactions for which they have been registered. after transaction
completion, the transactions are not removed from the list, so the lists grow without
bound. since these interceptors use List.
should the transaction be removed from the list at the end of
SynchronizationHandler.afterCompletion?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853136#3853136
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853136
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults?log=log20041028115238Lbuild.349
BUILD COMPLETE - build.349Date of build: 10/28/2004 11:52:38Time to build: 34 minutes 44 secondsLast changed: 10/28/2004 11:08:31Last log entry: no message
The testsuite build is changing. Later today, I will be replacing the existing
build.xml with ant16x-build.xml on all branches.
As a part of the cutover, I will be ensuring that the new testsuite includes all of
the tests covered by the existing one. To facilitate this, the existing build.xm
As of jboss-3.2.4 you can set the timeout at the ejb method level. See the jta notes
here:
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=48895
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853143#3853143
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/i
Another raving customer/user
We have been using JBoss for some 3 years, this helped to gradually adopt a lot of
OpenSource products [and buy some support as well :)]
Please move on with JBoss mail. Our company is on the search for a replacement for
Notes mail. We tried Apache James, JBoss Mail
Hi,
as much I have understand JBossMail is intended to become something like MS Exchange.
What about a storage layer for mails, e.g. a database?! Are there any plans to support
this?! If yes, how is it possible to contribute some ideas and maybe also source code
in that field of the project?!
This is pretty neat and fortunately we're using 3.2.5 so I'll definitely give this a
try.
But back to the original question, is there any reason not to increase the default
value? What if we have many methods that would otherwise need transaction-timeout
attributes to be set?
View the original
Try doing some work on it then. A mail service support IMAP is not a priority task.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853155#3853155
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853155
-
The downside is excessively long time to detection of deadlocks for those scenarios
jboss itself cannot detect. This may or may not be important as it depends on your
application behavior.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853156#3853156
Reply t
Bugs item #1056320, was opened at 2004-10-28 12:10
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1056320&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: N
Bugs item #1056320, was opened at 2004-10-28 12:10
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ioparra
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1056320&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #1048467, was opened at 2004-10-17 00:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andd
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1048467&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Hi!
Could You add by default xdoclet-apache module to JBossIDE? If You are using struts
You have to manualy add it, so it breaks eclipse updater feature ;P
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853169#3853169
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.or
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041028150035Lbuild.104
BUILD COMPLETE - build.104Date of build: 10/28/2004 15:00:35Time to build: 32 minutes 52 secondsLast changed: 10/28/2004 14:23:44Last log entry: added DeployXMBeanUnitT
Bugs item #1052254, was opened at 2004-10-22 17:45
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by andd
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1052254&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
What about arguments like -Dnojars and
| build -Dtest=cmp2/cmr test
| [/build]
|
| still works?
|
| Thanks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853175#3853175
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&m
And what does this preference do?
JSP's are compiled by the App Server dynamicly at load time.
Is this a "test" compile of some nature?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853180#3853180
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=
Yes, the usual compilation prevention and test subset entry points work.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853184#3853184
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853184
Bugs item #1052254, was opened at 2004-10-22 17:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andd
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1052254&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Bugs item #1053277, *.jbossmx.compliance.monitor.BasicTestCase failures, is fixed
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853190#3853190
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853190
---
Bugs item #1052254, XMBean 1.0 parsing notification bug
and
Bugs item #1048467, MMBs do not emit AttributeChangeNotification to Listeners
are fixed for all branches
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853189#3853189
Reply to the post :
http://ww
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041028161054Lbuild.350
BUILD COMPLETE - build.350Date of build: 10/28/2004 16:10:54Time to build: 32 minutes 6 secondsLast changed: 10/28/2004 15:36:20Last log entry: added DeployXMBeanUnitT
I've documented in detail how you can extend the DeploymentService with new velocity
templates:
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WritingDeploymentTemplates
The service dependencies are velocity.jar & commons-collections.jar which are included
with the deployment-service.sar archive.
Com
It allows you to pre-compile the JSPs so the container doesn't have to, thus saving
you testing time :).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853195#3853195
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=38531
I have been having a devil of a time trying to get Hibernate to find the
hibernate.cfg.xml file when debugging in IntelliJ with or without the Hibernate
plugin.
So what I did was load it up using File and then passed it into configure("..."); That
seems to be OK but now I am getting this error
try the following:
/deploy/hibernate.har/hibernate.cfg.xml
/deploy/hibernate.har/meta-inf/hibernate-service.xml
/deploy/hibernate.har/yourclassfolder/*.Class
/deploy/hibernate.har/yourclassfolder/*.hbm.xml
regards
Andrew
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=vi
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041028174556
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:62: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041028185159Lbuild.105
BUILD COMPLETE - build.105Date of build: 10/28/2004 18:51:59Time to build: 22 minutes 1 secondLast changed: 10/28/2004 17:03:26Last log entry: fixed [ 1052254 ] XMBean
A workaround is to take out the include.
I'll have to put this on the TODO list.
Thanks for finding the bug and reporting,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853202#3853202
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=p
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041028194916Lbuild.351
BUILD COMPLETE - build.351Date of build: 10/28/2004 19:49:16Time to build: 20 minutes 29 secondsLast changed: 10/28/2004 19:42:36Last log entry: move some things up to
Bugs item #1056478, was opened at 2004-10-28 17:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1056478&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #1056478, was opened at 2004-10-29 03:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1056478&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority
59 matches
Mail list logo
