I am still unclear on the plan for EJB3 annotations support in Q4 and past
that, knowing Eclipse is lagging behind. If hbm files will be used for mapping,
how are those going to be generated from annotations? Using Bill's annotation
compiler of some javac workaround with jdk 1.5? Please explain
Yes - eclipse lags behind on annotation support.
I recently saw that they now have assigned the annotation support to two
people, so hopefully we will see some progress, but the timeline is still
somewhere in 2005Q1 for eclipse support.
I acutally also tried out running a ant task for running ja
Almost.
I still don't understand if the following scenario will work with the next
release of JBossIDE:
1) Edit POJO source to add EJB3 annotations. No smart code assist, no
refactoring on annotations, just plain text edit.
2) Compilation of POJO source from JBossIDE will have the same result a
"ivelin" wrote : Almost.
|
Good :)
"ivelin" wrote :
| I still don't understand if the following scenario will work with the next
release of JBossIDE:
|
| 1) Edit POJO source to add EJB3 annotations. No smart code assist, no
refactoring on annotations, just plain text edit.
|
yup
Patches item #1066133, was opened at 2004-11-14 13:19
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=1066133&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution
Bugs item #1041495, was opened at 2004-10-06 14:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tdiesler
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1041495&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
OK, I get it now. Thanks.
The plan looks fine provided that Eclipse will meet their deadlines. We need to
think of a more user friendly alternative in case Eclipse annotations are not
there by April.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855108#385
Sorry for not making it to the conf call, was "trapped" in transit between
cities.
Regarding dependencies i'll just show how I see the current persistence
"dependencies"
We'll provide the following plugins:
org.hibernate.eclipse.core
Hibernate3 core plugin, for use by other plugins that need
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041114101743Lbuild.180
BUILD COMPLETE - build.180Date of build: 11/14/2004 10:17:43Time to build: 15 minutes 43 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 10:10:54Last log entry: Replace AxisRuntimeExce
Bugs item #1066186, was opened at 2004-11-14 17:56
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1066186&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #1066186, was opened at 2004-11-14 17:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1066186&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041114111735Lbuild.181
BUILD COMPLETE - build.181Date of build: 11/14/2004 11:17:35Time to build: 16 minutes 16 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 11:06:07Last log entry: /** Get port component
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041114125406Lbuild.436
BUILD COMPLETE - build.436Date of build: 11/14/2004 12:54:06Time to build: 21 minutes 35 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 12:47:34Last log entry: ported InvalidationMan
Hey guys, looks like I'm late to the party =)
max wrote :
| I'm saying that eclipses built in support for running a ant build.xml file
when certain files are updated works fine EXCEPT that it seem to crash if your
build.xml generates stuff (e.g. .class or .jar files) which eclipse is already
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041114132902Lbuild.182
BUILD COMPLETE - build.182Date of build: 11/14/2004 13:29:02Time to build: 17 minutes 35 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 13:12:50Last log entry: added invalidateAll() o
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041114135412Lbuild.180
BUILD COMPLETE - build.180Date of build: 11/14/2004 13:54:12Time to build: 21 minutes 27 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 13:13:38Last log entry: added invalidateAll() o
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041114142106Lbuild.437
BUILD COMPLETE - build.437Date of build: 11/14/2004 14:21:06Time to build: 16 minutes 2 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 13:14:24Last log entry: added invalidateAll() o
"marshall" wrote : Hey guys, looks like I'm late to the party =)
|
yeah - partycrasher! ;)
max wrote :
| I'm saying that eclipses built in support for running a ant build.xml file
when certain files are updated works fine EXCEPT that it seem to crash if your
build.xml generates stuff (e.g
oh - and e.g. the hbm.xml editor...should that depend on our xml editor or the
editor in webtools ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855123#3855123
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3855123
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041114152242Lbuild.183
BUILD COMPLETE - build.183Date of build: 11/14/2004 15:22:42Time to build: 17 minutes 3 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 15:12:46Last log entry: s/IMPLIEDD/IMPLIED/
We would like our aspects to accumulate information, or self configure on a
PER_INSTANCE basis - then also make the instance and aspect stack serializable
in order to relocate it. Is this possible? A spike has shown that the aspects
dont get serialized is this a design feature or can we work
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041114155144Lbuild.438
BUILD COMPLETE - build.438Date of build: 11/14/2004 15:51:44Time to build: 25 minutes 12 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 15:15:01Last log entry: s/IMPLIEDD/IMPLIED/
I had a look at CacheLoader's over the weekend, but not quite sure what I would
actually need to implement.
To 'build' the object that needs to be cached requires invoking a custom object
which handles all the Data retrieval and building, and because of legacy code,
there is _no_ concept of tr
"max" wrote :
| I was using the automated builder stuff which is in eclipse.
| Just added a "builder" on my project and told which ant file and target to
run when certain resources are changed (like all files in model/src).
|
| Can it be more integrated than that ?
|
There is an actu
This relates to my other post "SERIALIZABLE Bug? Read of null, put, another
thread reading", and I just wish to clarify something.
Assuming a rather simplistic TreeCache usage, where all Fqn would be of the
form "/23" where the number is really the ID of the object row in the DB.
If I implement
answering my own question I think, but from doing some test cases, it appears I
still need the SERIALIZABLE isolation level in the above example using a
CacheLoader, as 2 threads trying to read the same (empty/null) value will both
go "hunting" in the db and clobber the first ones value.
Test
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20041114203136Lbuild.10
BUILD COMPLETE - build.10Date of build: 11/14/2004 20:31:36Time to build: 21 minutes 15 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 15:15:01Last log entry: s/IMPLIEDD/IM
hi,
could you tell me how to turn JBOSS AOP optimization off in the build.xml of
ant?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&o
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20041114225710Lbuild.14
BUILD COMPLETE - build.14Date of build: 11/14/2004 22:57:10Time to build: 25 minutes 41 secondsLast changed: 11/14/2004 15:12:46Last log entry: s/IMPLIEDD/IMP
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20041114232753
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:66: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbos
test
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855143#3855143
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3855143
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Inte
test reply
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855144#3855144
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3855144
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
qw
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855145#3855145
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3855145
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSy
Bugs item #1061372, was opened at 2004-11-06 03:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nihility
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1061372&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Su
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041115014256Lbuild.184
BUILD COMPLETE - build.184Date of build: 11/15/2004 01:42:56Time to build: 14 minutes 40 secondsLast changed: 11/15/2004 01:36:17Last log entry: Fix service name in und
"tallpsmith" wrote :
|
| I assume these are the methods I need to be concerned with? The above URL
mentions other methods which I believe I can basically ignore??? (no-op impl)
|
|
Yes, I'd make them no-ops. If you look at the next version of JBossCache (1.2),
we will have a CacheL
The answer is "yes" you need it for the current version (1.1) b/c the cache
loading is not synchronized between threads. However, in CVS head (becoming
JBossCache 1.2 before the end of the year, hopefully by mid December), this
*is* synchronized, so you should be fine.
This is orthogonal from th
37 matches
Mail list logo
