"bwang00" wrote : Like Norbert mentioned, use tx now. There is a known problem
in locking when tx is not used. We are fixing that in release 1.2.
Do I need locking when I am "getting" a value that is already in a node's map?
I do not care if other items are added to the map while I am "getting"
"norbert" wrote : Although the methods of 'Node' are declared as public, this
class is (currently) not intendet to be used directly by TreeCache-clients.
I am confused. The "getChildrenNames" method I referred to is on the TreeCache
class, not the Node class. Does it still fall into the describe
My cluster including 5-node JBoss. I want 3 nodes running when the system work,
but only 2 nodes run(as default). where and how should config them? please
suggest me.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3856638#3856638
Reply to the post :
http
Bugs item #1074970, was opened at 2004-11-28 19:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1074970&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Wanted to know the roadmap for supporting SOAP over JMS(JAXM).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3856632#3856632
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3856632
--
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20041128215354Lbuild.21
BUILD COMPLETE - build.21Date of build: 11/28/2004 21:53:54Time to build: 28 minutes 47 secondsLast changed: 11/28/2004 12:56:56Last log entry: [ 1071690 ] -
Bugs item #1074326, was opened at 2004-11-27 16:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by javajedi
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1074326&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priorit
Bugs item #1074970, was opened at 2004-11-28 22:21
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1074970&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: N
dimitris , Thanks for the reply.
i just needed MDB ears to be deployed and undeployed programmatically.
I donot want the topics/queues to be created programmatically.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3856627#3856627
Reply to the post :
http://www
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBH-1?page=comments#action_10149 ]
Scott M Stark commented on JBH-1:
-
Here is the first insdtance of the table not found problem:
2004-11-28 18:05:43,687 DEBUG [net.sf.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter]
Could not
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBH-1?page=comments#action_10148 ]
Scott M Stark commented on JBH-1:
-
Some additional info from the log on the ddl:
2004-11-28 18:05:43,328 DEBUG [net.sf.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaExport] drop
table user if exists
Since I'm pressed for time myself woking on this, I'll add the bare minimum.
Members will be able to upload files to the server and an automatic link will
be created for each file uploaded. That should be simple enough to implement
within a short amount time, maybe by the end of this week.
Da
Couple suggestions:
1. Like Norbert mentioned, use tx now. There is a known problem in locking when
tx is not used. We are fixing that in release 1.2.
2. If you are using TreeCacheAop, I'd suggest you try the latest pre-1.2
release in jboss-head. I have done some refactoring and bug fixing on t
Yes.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3856624#3856624
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3856624
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Produc
Hot deployment of Tomcat
Key: JBWEB-2
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWEB-2
Project: JBoss Web (Tomcat)
Type: Bug
Components: Tomcat
Versions: JBossWeb-4.0.1
Reporter: Dimitris Andreadis
Assigned to: Remy Maucherat
Hi,
I am using javassist for this project:
http://pec.dev.java.net
and I find that toString for CtClass etc. don't override toString in Object and
therefore don't behave like toString in Class etc. and I find this behaviour
inconvenient.
I have written some toString methods in a utility class
MarshallDocLiteralTestCase fails under java5
Key: JBOSSWS-1
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBOSSWS-1
Project: JBoss Web Services (JBoss WS)
Type: Bug
Environment: current Branch_4_0 under on the test client vm.
j
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041128171207Lbuild.198
BUILD COMPLETE - build.198Date of build: 11/28/2004 17:12:07Time to build: 13 minutes 22 secondsLast changed: 11/28/2004 16:46:43Last log entry: copy xercesImpl.jar & x
ContextCLTestCase fails under java5
---
Key: JBR-15
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBR-15
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Bug
Versions: JBoss-AS-4.0.1
Environment: java version "1.5.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Enviro
CompleteUnitTestCase fails under java5
--
Key: JBR-14
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBR-14
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Bug
Versions: JBoss-AS-4.0.1
Environment:13:35:08,406 INFO [Server] St
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBR-7?page=history ]
Scott M Stark updated JBR-7:
Fix Version: JBoss-AS-4.0.1
> Tasks for the 4.0.1 Release
> ---
>
> Key: JBR-7
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBR-7
>
Fix the java5 testsuite errors
--
Key: JBR-13
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBR-13
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Task
Versions: JBoss-AS-4.0.0
Environment: [EMAIL PROTECTED] testsuite]$ /usr/java/jdk1.5.0/bin/ja
VersionedObjectUnitTestCase fails under java5
-
Key: JBAOP-1
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-1
Project: JBoss AOP
Type: Bug
Environment: 13:35:08,406 INFO [Server] Starting JBoss (MX MicroKernel)...
13:35:08,
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041128154629Lbuild.503
BUILD COMPLETE - build.503Date of build: 11/28/2004 15:46:29Time to build: 24 minutes 0 secondsLast changed: 11/28/2004 12:56:56Last log entry: [ 1071690 ] - jdk5 Mode
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041128150053Lbuild.197
BUILD COMPLETE - build.197Date of build: 11/28/2004 15:00:53Time to build: 21 minutes 33 secondsLast changed: 11/28/2004 13:06:19Last log entry: [ 1071690 ] - jdk5 Mode
CMS Portlet User Guide
--
Key: JBPTL-60
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPTL-60
Project: JBoss Portal
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Roy Russo
Assigned to: Roy Russo
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think i
Functional Spec
---
Key: JBPTL-59
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPTL-59
Project: JBoss Portal
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Roy Russo
Assigned to: Roy Russo
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent inc
Bugs item #1071690, was opened at 2004-11-23 15:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andd
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1071690&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v4.0
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041128141001Lbuild.229
BUILD COMPLETE - build.229Date of build: 11/28/2004 14:10:01Time to build: 25 minutes 40 secondsLast changed: 11/28/2004 12:59:12Last log entry: [ 1071690 ] - jdk5 Mode
jiwils wrote:
anonymous wrote : Since I am not using transactions...
I guess you should use transactions. Without transactions the
TransactionIsolationLevel is not imposed, there's no Node locking and as a
result the content of a Node might just be modified in the moment you are
calling 'get()'
Although the methods of 'Node' are declared as public, this class is
(currently) not intendet to be used directly by TreeCache-clients.
The only way to access TreeCache in a threadsafe manner is through TreeCache's
methods (put(), get() etc...)
The methods of Node are not threadsafe. Whenever
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-testsuite?log=log20041128123531Lbuild.9
BUILD COMPLETE - build.9Date of build: 11/28/2004 12:35:31Time to build: 85 minutes 29 secondsLast changed: 11/28/2004 12:15:52Last log entry: Update to hiberna
Invalid Assign To drop down contents
Key: JBQA-39
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBQA-39
Project: JBoss QA
Type: Bug
Reporter: Scott M Stark
Assigned to: Ryan Campbell
Priority: Blocker
The Assign To drop down
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20041128051230Lbuild.13
BUILD COMPLETE - build.13Date of build: 11/28/2004 05:12:30Time to build: 82 minutes 9 seconds
Unit Tests: (1873) To
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20041128071851Lbuild.26
BUILD COMPLETE - build.26Date of build: 11/28/2004 07:18:51Time to build: 31 minutes 24 seconds
Unit Tests: (0) Tot
Maybe this is an issue with ananomous schema types. You could try
|
|
| http://iss.lmco.com/schema/action-item-summary";
maxOccurs="1"/>
|
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3856600#3856600
Reply to the post :
htt
36 matches
Mail list logo
