[JBoss-dev] jboss-head-jdk-matrix build.37 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20041219004226Lbuild.37 BUILD COMPLETE - build.37Date of build: 12/19/2004 00:42:26Time to build: 21 minutes 19 secondsLast changed: 12/18/2004 19:45:26Last log entry: Add the secur

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-35) InvalidDestinationException after Cluster Master failover

2004-12-18 Thread Ovidiu Feodorov (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-35?page=comments#action_12310889 ] Ovidiu Feodorov commented on JBAS-35: - For both 4.0.0 and 4.0.1RC2 I deployed a simple singleton that makes it obvious in the logs when it is started and stopped. I tried th

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.600 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041218195233Lbuild.600 BUILD COMPLETE - build.600Date of build: 12/18/2004 19:52:33Time to build: 19 minutes 55 secondsLast changed: 12/18/2004 19:45:26Last log entry: Add the security-confi

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBCACHE-19) TreeCache.evict() doesn't go though interceptor chain

2004-12-18 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-19?page=comments#action_12310888 ] Bela Ban commented on JBCACHE-19: - Simply calling remove() or removeData() doesn't work, because that would mean that these calls would be potentially replicated as well ! H

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBCACHE-19) TreeCache.evict() doesn't go though interceptor chain

2004-12-18 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-19?page=comments#action_12310887 ] Bela Ban commented on JBCACHE-19: - I need to verify that this doesn't create any new problems first > TreeCache.evict() doesn't go though interceptor chain > ---

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-19) TreeCache.evict() doesn't go though interceptor chain

2004-12-18 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
TreeCache.evict() doesn't go though interceptor chain - Key: JBCACHE-19 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-19 Project: JBoss Cache Type: Bug Versions: 1.2 Reporter: Bela Ban Assigned to: Bel

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.599 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041218185838Lbuild.599 BUILD COMPLETE - build.599Date of build: 12/18/2004 18:58:38Time to build: 17 minutes 18 secondsLast changed: 12/18/2004 18:49:11Last log entry: Fix for JBCACHE-17 (Ji

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Image galery module dev

2004-12-18 Thread javajenks
Is anyone porting the php gallery module, that runs under phpNuke ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3859169#3859169 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3859169

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.598 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041218172816Lbuild.598 BUILD COMPLETE - build.598Date of build: 12/18/2004 17:28:16Time to build: 15 minutes 9 secondsLast changed: 12/18/2004 16:48:37Last log entry: internal refactoring

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.597 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041218164749Lbuild.597 BUILD COMPLETE - build.597Date of build: 12/18/2004 16:47:49Time to build: 18 minutes 0 secondsLast changed: 12/18/2004 16:31:53Last log entry: finished decoupling con

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss's Web Services Implementation] - Re: Coupling between namespace object models

2004-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's done. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3859167#3859167 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3859167 --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.596 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041218153926Lbuild.596 BUILD COMPLETE - build.596Date of build: 12/18/2004 15:39:26Time to build: 15 minutes 44 secondsLast changed: 12/18/2004 15:33:53Last log entry: first step in decoupli

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss's Web Services Implementation] - Re: Coupling between namespace object models

2004-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Decoupling phase is done. The testcase is updated. Now, the 'property type' phase... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3859164#3859164 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3859164 ---

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss's Web Services Implementation] - Re: Coupling between namespace object models

2004-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is exactly how I am going to fix this. Also there already is GenericObjectModelFactory interface. Which accepts parents and children as java.lang.Object's. Implementations of this interface are not introspected for 'typed' methods. So, everything is delegated to generic methods. View the

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss's Web Services Implementation] - Re: Coupling between namespace object models

2004-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Correct, the type binding can only be as strong as the object model itself exposes. The xml framework should not be looking for more explicit type bindings by default. That should not preclude an object factory from choosing to expose type specific injection points, so say the xmbean factory wan

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss's Web Services Implementation] - Re: Coupling between namespace object models

2004-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a good point. This issue also raised a few others in my mind regarding this type of object model factories, i.e. the one that uses introspection when adding children to parents. If you look at the factory implementation, you will see that all addChild methods are 'typed', i.e. parent an

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss's Web Services Implementation] - Coupling between namespace object models

2004-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm looking at the org.jboss.test.xml.MultispacedUnitTestCase which demonstrates unmarshalling a document that has two schemas/namespaces for two object models that are loosely coupled via a one-one unidirectional relationship. The two object models are the XMBeanMetaData and JDBCPm. A XMBeanMe

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 build.278 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041218112425Lbuild.278 BUILD COMPLETE - build.278Date of build: 12/18/2004 11:24:25Time to build: 16 minutes 17 secondsLast changed: 12/18/2004 10:56:06Last log entry: commented testConcurren

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Build System] - compiling jboss with jdk 1.5.0

2004-12-18 Thread sviluppatorefico
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 10:46 AMPost subject: build on jboss4.0.0 with jdk 1.5.0 hi when i use the build.sh command in the jboss sources with the jdk 1.5.0 i've this error: [execmodules] javac: targe

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JBCACHE-15) 4.0 testsuite failures

2004-12-18 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-15?page=history ] Bela Ban resolved JBCACHE-15: - Resolution: Deferred Fix Version: 1.2.1 Deferred to JBCACHE-17 > 4.0 testsuite failures > -- > > Key: JBCACHE-15 > U

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-18) Uncomment LRUPolicyUnitTestCase

2004-12-18 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
Uncomment LRUPolicyUnitTestCase --- Key: JBCACHE-18 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-18 Project: JBoss Cache Type: Sub-task Versions: 1.2 Reporter: Bela Ban Assigned to: Bela Ban Fix For: 1.2.1 Uncomment

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBCACHE-15) 4.0 testsuite failures

2004-12-18 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-15?page=comments#action_12310884 ] Bela Ban commented on JBCACHE-15: - I have described the probable cause in JBCACHE-17. I'll comment the test case for now and fix it in JBCACHE-17. > 4.0 testsuite failures

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JBCACHE-14) Stable version merged with JBoss 4.0 branch

2004-12-18 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-14?page=history ] Bela Ban resolved JBCACHE-14: - Resolution: Done Fix Version: 1.2 done by Scott > Stable version merged with JBoss 4.0 branch > --- > > K

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-17) No synchronization between CreateIfNotExistsInterceptor and LockInterceptor

2004-12-18 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
No synchronization between CreateIfNotExistsInterceptor and LockInterceptor --- Key: JBCACHE-17 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-17 Project: JBoss Cache Type: Bug Versions: 1.2

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Build System] - build on jboss4.0.0 with jdk 1.5.0

2004-12-18 Thread sviluppatorefico
hi when i use the build.sh command in the jboss sources with the jdk 1.5.0 i've this error: [execmodules] javac: target release 1.4 conflicts with default source release 1.5 BUILD FAILED /usr/src/jboss-4.0.0-src/tools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.ent:411: Compile failed; see the compiler erro

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBossCache] - cannot list on any port in range 0-123

2004-12-18 Thread jhudson
Hi, I posted this question previously but forgot to include my cluster-service.xml. I'm using JBoss 4.0.0 on a Red Hat Linux machine and am having trouble with JGroups when I start JBoss. Below is startup log in debug mode and then my cluster-service.xml. Please help me. Thank you very much.

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-703883 ] Differences between deploy on W2K and SuSE Linux

2004-12-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #703883, was opened at 2003-03-14 17:32 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by topping You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=703883&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Pri

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-659897 ] SecurityException not being thrown?

2004-12-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #659897, was opened at 2002-12-30 01:31 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by topping You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=659897&group_id=22866 Category: JBossSX Group: v3.2 >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priorit

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-16) Plan for JGroups/JBoss Cache training development

2004-12-18 Thread Juha Lindfors (JIRA)
Plan for JGroups/JBoss Cache training development - Key: JBCACHE-16 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-16 Project: JBoss Cache Type: Task Components: Training Reporter: Juha Lindfors Assigned to: Be

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.595 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041218042017Lbuild.595 BUILD COMPLETE - build.595Date of build: 12/18/2004 04:20:17Time to build: 15 minutes 31 secondsLast changed: 12/18/2004 01:05:52Last log entry: Added JBoss Messaging/

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 build.277 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041218033830Lbuild.277 BUILD COMPLETE - build.277Date of build: 12/18/2004 03:38:30Time to build: 19 minutes 36 secondsLast changed: 12/17/2004 13:14:35Last log entry: [JBAS-65] - Parse the s

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix build.11 Build Fixed

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20041218030857Lbuild.11 BUILD COMPLETE - build.11Date of build: 12/18/2004 03:08:57Time to build: 18 minutes 28 secondsLast changed: 12/17/2004 10:18:39Last log entry: added missing

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite build.27 Build Successful

2004-12-18 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20041218014256Lbuild.27 BUILD COMPLETE - build.27Date of build: 12/18/2004 01:42:56Time to build: 78 minutes 55 secondsLast changed: 12/17/2004 10:18:39Last log entry: added missing M