[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.798 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050214005040Lbuild.798 BUILD COMPLETE - build.798Date of build: 02/14/2005 00:50:40Time to build: 22 minutes 10 secondsLast changed: 02/14/2005 00:05:35Last log entry: moved labels into reso

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Theme development

I published Patrick's work for you to see. (as it didn't go through the forum so well :) ) http://www.jboss.org/products/jbossportal/themePatrick.zip Thanks again Patrick. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3866415#3866415 Reply to the post : ht

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Fqn hashCode() method

After a quick scan of the Fqn implementation, I noticed that the hashCode() method doesn't use a cached implementation technique. Is this done intentionally to allow the underlying objects that make up the Fqn instance to change their hash codes? I can see why this might be required to keep the

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.797 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050213192314Lbuild.797 BUILD COMPLETE - build.797Date of build: 02/13/2005 19:23:14Time to build: 20 minutes 10 secondsLast changed: 02/13/2005 18:55:50Last log entry: Add tests of how an ex

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.796 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050213182006Lbuild.796 BUILD COMPLETE - build.796Date of build: 02/13/2005 18:20:06Time to build: 20 minutes 48 secondsLast changed: 02/13/2005 17:50:29Last log entry: fixed form mappings so

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Priority of connection selection when using security-dom

That definitely breaks the connection pooling as the selection of the InternalManagedConnectionPool is based on a Subject that does not have the PasswordCredential, but the pools map key is a Subject with this added in. There would have to be another pooling criteria key that only validated the

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.795 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050213164420Lbuild.795 BUILD COMPLETE - build.795Date of build: 02/13/2005 16:44:20Time to build: 30 minutes 59 secondsLast changed: 02/13/2005 16:30:26Last log entry: updated for change fro

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 build.376 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050213153824Lbuild.376 BUILD COMPLETE - build.376Date of build: 02/13/2005 15:38:24Time to build: 19 minutes 3 secondsLast changed: 02/13/2005 12:39:37Last log entry: Fix prefixed xmlName, xm

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.794 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050213142710Lbuild.794 BUILD COMPLETE - build.794Date of build: 02/13/2005 14:27:10Time to build: 30 minutes 28 secondsLast changed: 02/13/2005 13:52:19Last log entry: Added for non-scoped t

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Eclipse IDE (dev)] - Re: JBossIDE New Extension Wishlists

I'd like to see reverse xdoclet support, so I can very easily show my bosses that application currently running on Bea can run easily on jBoss (without the runtime deployment converter, cause that scares them although it works for some applications) View the original post : http://www.jboss.or

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Eclipse IDE (dev)] - Re: jBPM designer in JBoss-IDE 1.5 (dev)

It's compliant with 3.0. Look at the jbpm forums on SF for some topics on this issue. Ronald View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3866401#3866401 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3866401 --

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBossXB] - Getting JBossXB support into the 4.0.x service deployment la

I created the following jira issue that I want to discuss how to best achieve here http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1461 The problem is that services are still embedding xml parsing of attribute configuration document fragments in the service code itself. The example jboss-service.xml doc

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 build.375 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050213104904Lbuild.375 BUILD COMPLETE - build.375Date of build: 02/13/2005 10:49:04Time to build: 40 minutes 47 secondsLast changed: 02/13/2005 10:29:04Last log entry: Fix layout of generated

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Forcing eviction of child nodes

Hi; In section 8.1 of the TreeCache documentation (and related docs/design/EvictionPolicy.txt), it says that when a node is evicted, it will only be removed if it does not have children. I understand why this is desirable in some cases, but I have a slightly different requirement. In my case,

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Using JBossAS 4.0.1 as Server

I have successfully used the stand-alone implementation of remoting 1.0.1 beta in a prototype and now want to replace the stand-alone server with JBoss AS 4.0.1 Research / trial and error led me to the need to replace jboss-common.jar in {JBOSS_HOME}\lib with the one distributed with the stand-

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix build.87 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050213044233Lbuild.87 BUILD COMPLETE - build.87Date of build: 02/13/2005 04:42:33Time to build: 43 minutes 35 secondsLast changed: 02/12/2005 19:04:38Last log entry: Update the get

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix build.54 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20050213035754Lbuild.54 BUILD COMPLETE - build.54Date of build: 02/13/2005 03:57:54Time to build: 23 minutes 21 seconds  Unit Tests: (0)  Tot

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite build.70 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20050213013339Lbuild.70 BUILD COMPLETE - build.70Date of build: 02/13/2005 01:33:39Time to build: 99 minutes 36 seconds  Unit Tests: (1936)  T