[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Profiler] - New Feature - Memory Profiler

2005-04-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Temporary location: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPROFILER-1 I've worked in a new version for JBossProfiler using JVMTI (in another words, Java 5). For those who are new to Java 5, JVMTI means Java Virtual Machine Tool Interface. A C/C++ JNI Interface that captures events from profiling.

[JBoss-dev] [Design of XDoclet Tags on JBoss (XDoclet/JBoss)] - XDoclet dies on stack overflow (Eclipse plugin)

2005-04-09 Thread alexmo
I have an EJB project that depends on a number of other projects containing variuous classes. Experimentally I found, that when these other projects have mutual dependencies, such that project B must be placed into project A's build path, and project A must be listed in the build path of B, any

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Minor fixes to HEAD and integration of Nokia branch

2005-04-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yeah but it screws up because of the not null constraint View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3873348#3873348 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3873348

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix build.125 Build Successful

2005-04-09 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050409180315Lbuild.125 BUILD COMPLETE - build.125Date of build: 04/09/2005 18:03:15Time to build: 28 minutes 48 seconds  Unit Tests: (0)  T

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Minor fixes to HEAD and integration of Nokia branch

2005-04-09 Thread mikezzz
Correction LocalMessage.java revision 1.4 has bodyType commented out, revision 1.3 has it in. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3873346#3873346 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3873346 --

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Minor fixes to HEAD and integration of Nokia branch

2005-04-09 Thread mikezzz
You've merged against an old revision. Check revision 1.5 of LocalMessage.java. BodyType is commented out, but is present in 1.4. Same with MessageBean.java. I'm making some changes around the Mailbox->MailBody integration that I will commit soon. Fixes for JBMAIL-54 have kinda pushed towar

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Minor fixes to HEAD and integration of Nokia branch

2005-04-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
crap it looks like we're loosing the last chunk. I'll look into it, I think I have more to do. May need to move the header stuff and all. It seems that we're doing the dot stuffing already. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3873343#3873343 Rep

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Minor fixes to HEAD and integration of Nokia branch

2005-04-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've made minor fixes to head. I also did a bit of a cut and paste of the nokia branch to get that working. There is still some weird problem with the database being created with the bodytype having a not null constraint. Maybe I'm loopy but I haven't figured out WHO is creating the database

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-134) ManyToOne annotation – fetch attribute ignored

2005-04-09 Thread Dan Pupaza (JIRA)
ManyToOne annotation â fetch attribute ignored -- Key: EJBTHREE-134 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-134 Project: EJB 3.0 Type: Bug Components: EJB3 Extensions Versions: Preview 5, Preview 4 Envi

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: shared state between HttpSession and PortletSession

2005-04-09 Thread schnelzer
If you have some ideas on an approach, we would be happy to do some of the work. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=387#387 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=387

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: shared state between HttpSession and PortletSession

2005-04-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my current try is not for cluster, but could be adapted I think. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3873331#3873331 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3873331 ---

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: shared state between HttpSession and PortletSession

2005-04-09 Thread schnelzer
Thanks Julien. I'll send you my email address. I also have a follow up question that I thought would be good to have on the forum. Will you take this capability in to account as you test the JBoss Portal in a cluster? Thanks for the assistance. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-133) Update Entity Cache/clustering tutorial

2005-04-09 Thread Kabir Khan (JIRA)
Update Entity Cache/clustering tutorial --- Key: EJBTHREE-133 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-133 Project: EJB 3.0 Type: Task Components: Documentation Versions: Preview 5 Reporter: Kabir Khan Assig

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix build.93 Build Successful

2005-04-09 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20050409061905Lbuild.93 BUILD COMPLETE - build.93Date of build: 04/09/2005 06:19:05Time to build: 18 minutes 40 seconds  Unit Tests: (0)  Tot

[JBoss-dev] [Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: proposed mods to SARDeployer

2005-04-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me the whole hibernate deployer could be replaced by an xmbean interceptor to the SARDeployer that checks in the init step if any of the specified MBeans is of type org.jboss.hibernate.jmx.Hibernate, in order to do the extra "HarUrl" call to it to complete the setup. However, that

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite build.106 Build Successful

2005-04-09 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20050409032239Lbuild.106 BUILD COMPLETE - build.106Date of build: 04/09/2005 03:22:39Time to build: 67 minutes 34 seconds  Unit Tests: (1967)

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ClosedInterceptor and HierarchyInterceptor

2005-04-09 Thread timfox
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : anonymous wrote : There is one omission for now: The hierarchy interceptor does not maintain MessageConsumers. This is because there is currently no ConsumerDelegate class (the class returned from ServerSessionDelegate is a Consumer). Any proxy that's closed by the C